Zygoma Fractures: When Should You Repair the Orbital Floor?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jesse E Menville, Nidhi Shinde, Matthew J Lee, Luke Soliman, Albert S Woo
{"title":"Zygoma Fractures: When Should You Repair the Orbital Floor?","authors":"Jesse E Menville, Nidhi Shinde, Matthew J Lee, Luke Soliman, Albert S Woo","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) is one of the most commonly fractured areas of the midface. As the zygoma is an inherent component of the orbit, any fracture of the ZMC naturally involves the orbital floor. Previous research has focused on the surgical outcomes and complications of zygomatic fractures, but few have explored indications for orbital floor exploration alongside zygoma reduction. This study evaluates whether specific clinical and radiographic parameters predict the need for orbital floor reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with zygoma fractures managed by the plastic surgery service from 2015 to 2023. All patients underwent orbital floor exploration at the time of ZMC reconstruction, with implants placed when determined necessary. Computed tomography imaging was assessed for the presence of co-occurring fracture elements: zygomatic displacement at the infraorbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress, zygomaticofrontal suture, and zygomaticotemporal suture; and orbital floor displacement in the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and transverse directions. Logistic regression models were used to assess the adjusted effects of age and sex on implant placement.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>Seventy-nine zygomatic fracture cases met the study criteria, with 43 receiving an implant after orbital floor exploration. For every 1 mm increase in zygomatic displacement in the anterior-posterior direction, patients had 1.30 times higher odds of receiving an orbital implant (P=0.015). Rectus rounding and orbital floor defect volume were similarly among the strongest indications for orbital floor implant placement (P<0.001).</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) is one of the most commonly fractured areas of the midface. As the zygoma is an inherent component of the orbit, any fracture of the ZMC naturally involves the orbital floor. Previous research has focused on the surgical outcomes and complications of zygomatic fractures, but few have explored indications for orbital floor exploration alongside zygoma reduction. This study evaluates whether specific clinical and radiographic parameters predict the need for orbital floor reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with zygoma fractures managed by the plastic surgery service from 2015 to 2023. All patients underwent orbital floor exploration at the time of ZMC reconstruction, with implants placed when determined necessary. Computed tomography imaging was assessed for the presence of co-occurring fracture elements: zygomatic displacement at the infraorbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress, zygomaticofrontal suture, and zygomaticotemporal suture; and orbital floor displacement in the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and transverse directions. Logistic regression models were used to assess the adjusted effects of age and sex on implant placement.

Results and conclusion: Seventy-nine zygomatic fracture cases met the study criteria, with 43 receiving an implant after orbital floor exploration. For every 1 mm increase in zygomatic displacement in the anterior-posterior direction, patients had 1.30 times higher odds of receiving an orbital implant (P=0.015). Rectus rounding and orbital floor defect volume were similarly among the strongest indications for orbital floor implant placement (P<0.001).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信