{"title":"Diagnostic yields and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for biliary lesions.","authors":"Daiki Agarie, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Shota Harai, Kazuko Yamamoto, Takuji Okusaka","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Diagnostic yields of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for biliary lesions have not been fully established due to limited evidence. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of EUS-TA for biliary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic yields and adverse event rates of EUS-TA for biliary lesions were evaluated. The subject cases were only limited to cases in which the biliary lesions itself was punctured. Diagnostic yields of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-guided biopsy/cytology performed within the same period were also evaluated to assess the additional effect of EUS-TA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUS-TA was attempted in 71 cases (28 hilar bile duct, 19 distal bile duct, 4 ampulla of Vater, and 20 gallbladder), and the final diagnosis was malignant in 54 cases (76.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA were 96.3% (52/54), 100% (17/17), and 97.2% (69/71), respectively. Adverse events were observed in one case (1.4%, peritonitis). The accuracy of ERC biopsy/cytology was 82.5% (212/257 cases); additional EUS-TA diagnosed 30 cases as malignant additionally and improved the accuracy (94.2%; 242/257 cases; p < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-TA is an accurate and safe diagnostic test for biliary lesions. The addition of EUS-TA may be considered when there is a suspicion of a false-negative ERC result.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/purpose: Diagnostic yields of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for biliary lesions have not been fully established due to limited evidence. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of EUS-TA for biliary lesions.
Methods: Diagnostic yields and adverse event rates of EUS-TA for biliary lesions were evaluated. The subject cases were only limited to cases in which the biliary lesions itself was punctured. Diagnostic yields of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-guided biopsy/cytology performed within the same period were also evaluated to assess the additional effect of EUS-TA.
Results: EUS-TA was attempted in 71 cases (28 hilar bile duct, 19 distal bile duct, 4 ampulla of Vater, and 20 gallbladder), and the final diagnosis was malignant in 54 cases (76.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA were 96.3% (52/54), 100% (17/17), and 97.2% (69/71), respectively. Adverse events were observed in one case (1.4%, peritonitis). The accuracy of ERC biopsy/cytology was 82.5% (212/257 cases); additional EUS-TA diagnosed 30 cases as malignant additionally and improved the accuracy (94.2%; 242/257 cases; p < .01).
Conclusions: EUS-TA is an accurate and safe diagnostic test for biliary lesions. The addition of EUS-TA may be considered when there is a suspicion of a false-negative ERC result.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.