Correlation between electromyography findings and plasticity grading score after long-term phrenic nerve to musculocutaneous nerve transfer in brachial plexus injuries.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Simon Miedema, Francisco Vargas, Eugenia Conti, Martin Bourguet, Martijn Malessy, Mariano Socolovsky
{"title":"Correlation between electromyography findings and plasticity grading score after long-term phrenic nerve to musculocutaneous nerve transfer in brachial plexus injuries.","authors":"Simon Miedema, Francisco Vargas, Eugenia Conti, Martin Bourguet, Martijn Malessy, Mariano Socolovsky","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.FOCUS24866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with complete traumatic brachial plexus injuries often require nerve transfers to restore lost function. Phrenic nerve (PN)-musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer can be used to restore elbow flexion. The degree to which reinnervated muscles achieve independent control requires central plastic changes. The central program of the PN donor nerve needs to disconnect and establish connections with that of the recipient MCN. This study aimed to improve understanding of the brain's changes after PN-MCN transfer by correlating electromyography (EMG) findings with clinical plasticity grading scale (PGS) scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent PN-MCN transfer after brachial plexus injury. EMG assessments were systematically performed under 3 distinct conditions: 1) normal respiration with the arm at rest, 2) deep respiration with the arm at rest, and 3) voluntary elbow flexion performed without inspiration. Motor unit potentials (MUPs) detected within a 150-msec interval were systematically categorized using a 5-point scale. Brain plasticity was clinically evaluated using the 4-point PGS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients with a mean age of 21.8 years were included in the study. A significant negative correlation was found between EMG activity during deep breathing and PGS outcomes (correlation coefficient [CC] -0.623, p = 0.031). Likewise, EMG activity during deep breathing showed a negative correlation with EMG activity during voluntary elbow flexion (CC -0.811, p = 0.002). Only 1 patient (8%) demonstrated complete disconnection between the donor and recipient neural pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' findings indicate a significant correlation between clinical measures of brain plasticity and EMG outcomes. Additionally, complete cerebral disconnection was rarely attained, with most patients retaining residual influence from the original donor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 4","pages":"E2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.FOCUS24866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with complete traumatic brachial plexus injuries often require nerve transfers to restore lost function. Phrenic nerve (PN)-musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) transfer can be used to restore elbow flexion. The degree to which reinnervated muscles achieve independent control requires central plastic changes. The central program of the PN donor nerve needs to disconnect and establish connections with that of the recipient MCN. This study aimed to improve understanding of the brain's changes after PN-MCN transfer by correlating electromyography (EMG) findings with clinical plasticity grading scale (PGS) scores.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent PN-MCN transfer after brachial plexus injury. EMG assessments were systematically performed under 3 distinct conditions: 1) normal respiration with the arm at rest, 2) deep respiration with the arm at rest, and 3) voluntary elbow flexion performed without inspiration. Motor unit potentials (MUPs) detected within a 150-msec interval were systematically categorized using a 5-point scale. Brain plasticity was clinically evaluated using the 4-point PGS.

Results: Twelve patients with a mean age of 21.8 years were included in the study. A significant negative correlation was found between EMG activity during deep breathing and PGS outcomes (correlation coefficient [CC] -0.623, p = 0.031). Likewise, EMG activity during deep breathing showed a negative correlation with EMG activity during voluntary elbow flexion (CC -0.811, p = 0.002). Only 1 patient (8%) demonstrated complete disconnection between the donor and recipient neural pathways.

Conclusions: The authors' findings indicate a significant correlation between clinical measures of brain plasticity and EMG outcomes. Additionally, complete cerebral disconnection was rarely attained, with most patients retaining residual influence from the original donor function.

臂丛神经损伤长期膈神经转肌皮神经后肌电图表现与可塑性评分的相关性。
目的:完全性外伤性臂丛神经损伤患者通常需要神经移植来恢复失去的功能。膈神经(PN)-肌皮神经(MCN)移植可用于肘关节屈曲恢复。再神经支配肌肉达到独立控制的程度需要中枢可塑性的改变。PN供体神经的中心程序需要断开并与受体MCN建立连接。本研究旨在通过将肌电图(EMG)结果与临床可塑性评分(PGS)评分相关联,提高对PN-MCN转移后大脑变化的认识。方法:对臂丛神经损伤后行PN-MCN转移的患者进行前瞻性研究。在3种不同的条件下系统地进行肌电图评估:1)手臂静止时的正常呼吸,2)手臂静止时的深度呼吸,以及3)在没有吸气的情况下进行肘部自主屈曲。在150毫秒间隔内检测到的运动单位电位(MUPs)采用5分制进行系统分类。临床应用4点PGS评价脑可塑性。结果:12例患者被纳入研究,平均年龄21.8岁。深呼吸时肌电活动与PGS结果呈显著负相关(相关系数[CC] -0.623, p = 0.031)。同样,深呼吸时的肌电图活动与随意屈肘时的肌电图活动呈负相关(CC -0.811, p = 0.002)。只有1例患者(8%)表现出供体和受体神经通路完全断开。结论:作者的研究结果表明,脑可塑性的临床测量与肌电图结果之间存在显著相关性。此外,完全的脑断连很少实现,大多数患者保留了原始供体功能的残余影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信