Preventing and managing urinary tract infections: Exploring interventions and strategies implemented by NHS commissioning organisations in English primary care, 2017-2022.

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eirwen Sides, Donna M Lecky, Esther Taborn, Luke O'Neill, Emily Cooper
{"title":"Preventing and managing urinary tract infections: Exploring interventions and strategies implemented by NHS commissioning organisations in English primary care, 2017-2022.","authors":"Eirwen Sides, Donna M Lecky, Esther Taborn, Luke O'Neill, Emily Cooper","doi":"10.1177/17571774251330536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of antibiotics are prescribed in primary care. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the second most common reason for antibiotic prescribing in this sector. This study explores activities used by English Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) to improve UTI prevention and management 2017-2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was sent to CCG primary care chief nurses and medicines optimisation leads August-September 2022. Qualitative data was mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant response rate was 14.1% (56/397), with representation from 29.2% (31/106) CCGs and across a range of roles. Education and training were the most reported intervention types, while changing the environment to facilitate behaviours was the least. Most interventions targeted general practice staff and patients, followed by care home staff, and residents and their families.The most reported success measures included reduction in antibiotic prescribing (54.5%, 97/178 interventions); positive stakeholder feedback (42.1%, 75/178); and increased adherence to diagnostic guidelines (32.6%, 58/178). 48.8% (20/41) stated their UTI activities had not been formally evaluated. Barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation included: availability of resources and time; staff collaboration; availability and accuracy of information; public and staff beliefs; systems and processes; and staff roles and responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UTI interventions rolled out through English health authorities could be further improved through structures that increase capacity to effectively evaluate activities and share learning. Staff engagement and collaboration are key facilitators to implementation and should be leveraged in further initiatives, while support and guidance are provided to adapt initiatives to fit in the changing healthcare landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"17571774251330536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774251330536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The majority of antibiotics are prescribed in primary care. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the second most common reason for antibiotic prescribing in this sector. This study explores activities used by English Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) to improve UTI prevention and management 2017-2022.

Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to CCG primary care chief nurses and medicines optimisation leads August-September 2022. Qualitative data was mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results: Participant response rate was 14.1% (56/397), with representation from 29.2% (31/106) CCGs and across a range of roles. Education and training were the most reported intervention types, while changing the environment to facilitate behaviours was the least. Most interventions targeted general practice staff and patients, followed by care home staff, and residents and their families.The most reported success measures included reduction in antibiotic prescribing (54.5%, 97/178 interventions); positive stakeholder feedback (42.1%, 75/178); and increased adherence to diagnostic guidelines (32.6%, 58/178). 48.8% (20/41) stated their UTI activities had not been formally evaluated. Barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation included: availability of resources and time; staff collaboration; availability and accuracy of information; public and staff beliefs; systems and processes; and staff roles and responsibilities.

Conclusions: UTI interventions rolled out through English health authorities could be further improved through structures that increase capacity to effectively evaluate activities and share learning. Staff engagement and collaboration are key facilitators to implementation and should be leveraged in further initiatives, while support and guidance are provided to adapt initiatives to fit in the changing healthcare landscape.

预防和管理尿路感染:探索英国初级保健NHS委托组织实施的干预措施和策略,2017-2022。
背景:大多数抗生素是在初级保健中开的。尿路感染(uti)是该部门开出抗生素处方的第二大常见原因。本研究探讨了2017-2022年英国临床调试小组(ccg)用于改善尿路感染预防和管理的活动。方法:于2022年8 - 9月向CCG初级保健主任护士和药物优化负责人发放在线问卷。定性数据被映射到理论领域框架。结果:参与者的反应率为14.1%(56/397),代表了29.2%(31/106)的ccg,并在一系列角色中。教育和培训是报告最多的干预类型,而改变环境以促进行为是最少的。大多数干预措施的目标是全科医生和患者,其次是护理院工作人员、居民及其家属。报告最多的成功措施包括减少抗生素处方(54.5%,97/178项干预措施);利益相关者积极反馈(42.1%,75/178);提高了对诊断指南的依从性(32.6%,58/178)。48.8%(20/41)的患者表示他们的尿路感染活动没有得到正式评估。干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素包括:资源和时间的可用性;员工协作;信息的可用性和准确性;公众和员工的信念;系统和过程;以及员工的角色和职责。结论:通过提高有效评估活动和分享学习的能力的结构,可以进一步改进由英国卫生当局推出的尿路感染干预措施。员工参与和协作是实施的关键促进因素,应在进一步的举措中加以利用,同时提供支持和指导,以调整举措,以适应不断变化的医疗保健环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信