Bedaquiline and linezolid regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20240391
Mahdis Cheraghi, Mehrnaz Amiri, Sahar Andarzgoo, Fatemeh Zarei, Zahra Sadat Seghatoleslami, Rosella Centis, Dina Visca, Lia D'Ambrosio, Emanuele Pontali, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Giovanni Battista Migliori
{"title":"Bedaquiline and linezolid regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mahdis Cheraghi, Mehrnaz Amiri, Sahar Andarzgoo, Fatemeh Zarei, Zahra Sadat Seghatoleslami, Rosella Centis, Dina Visca, Lia D'Ambrosio, Emanuele Pontali, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Giovanni Battista Migliori","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a global public health challenge, complicating treatment strategies and requiring advanced therapeutic approaches. The persistence of MDR-TB has led to a demand for regimens that are more effective in improving treatment outcomes and controlling transmission. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to examine the efficacy of linezolid (LZD) and bedaquiline (BDQ) in MDR-TB treatment regimens, evaluating their roles in enhancing therapeutic success and informing optimized management of MDR-TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of LZD and BDQ in MDR-TB patients up to September 14, 2024. We analyzed treatment outcomes, reporting favorable outcomes (cured and treatment completed) and unfavorable outcomes (death, treatment failure, and loss to follow-up) with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included 11 trials, with a total of 1,999 participants. The findings indicate that BDQ+LZD-containing regimens yield significantly higher favorable treatment outcomes (84.5%; 95% CI, 79.8%-88.2%) and lower unfavorable outcomes (15.4%; 95% CI, 11.6%-20.2%). In contrast, regimens lacking either LZD or BDQ show lower efficacy, with favorable outcomes at 66.8% (95% CI, 59.5%-73.4%) and unfavorable outcomes at 33.0% (95% CI, 25.6%-41.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDR-TB treatment regimens including BDQ and LZD lead to significantly better patient outcomes. The combined bactericidal and protein synthesis-inhibiting effects of BDQ and LZD create a powerful therapeutic synergy. Adding pretomanid further enhances this effectiveness, highlighting its value in complex cases. Future research should focus on optimizing these regimens for safety and efficacy and explore adjunctive therapies to improve MDR-TB outcomes even further.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"51 1","pages":"e20240391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a global public health challenge, complicating treatment strategies and requiring advanced therapeutic approaches. The persistence of MDR-TB has led to a demand for regimens that are more effective in improving treatment outcomes and controlling transmission. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to examine the efficacy of linezolid (LZD) and bedaquiline (BDQ) in MDR-TB treatment regimens, evaluating their roles in enhancing therapeutic success and informing optimized management of MDR-TB.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of LZD and BDQ in MDR-TB patients up to September 14, 2024. We analyzed treatment outcomes, reporting favorable outcomes (cured and treatment completed) and unfavorable outcomes (death, treatment failure, and loss to follow-up) with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: Our analysis included 11 trials, with a total of 1,999 participants. The findings indicate that BDQ+LZD-containing regimens yield significantly higher favorable treatment outcomes (84.5%; 95% CI, 79.8%-88.2%) and lower unfavorable outcomes (15.4%; 95% CI, 11.6%-20.2%). In contrast, regimens lacking either LZD or BDQ show lower efficacy, with favorable outcomes at 66.8% (95% CI, 59.5%-73.4%) and unfavorable outcomes at 33.0% (95% CI, 25.6%-41.4%).

Conclusions: MDR-TB treatment regimens including BDQ and LZD lead to significantly better patient outcomes. The combined bactericidal and protein synthesis-inhibiting effects of BDQ and LZD create a powerful therapeutic synergy. Adding pretomanid further enhances this effectiveness, highlighting its value in complex cases. Future research should focus on optimizing these regimens for safety and efficacy and explore adjunctive therapies to improve MDR-TB outcomes even further.

贝达喹啉和利奈唑胺治疗耐多药结核病:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)仍然是全球公共卫生挑战,使治疗策略复杂化,需要先进的治疗方法。耐多药结核病的持续存在导致人们需要在改善治疗结果和控制传播方面更有效的治疗方案。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在检查利奈唑胺(LZD)和贝达喹啉(BDQ)在耐多药结核病治疗方案中的疗效,评估它们在提高治疗成功率和优化耐多药结核病管理方面的作用。方法:综合检索MEDLINE (PubMed)、EMBASE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、Scopus和Web of Science,检索截至2024年9月14日评估LZD和BDQ对耐多药结核病患者疗效的随机对照试验。我们分析了治疗结果,报告了有利结果(治愈和治疗完成)和不利结果(死亡、治疗失败和随访失败),置信区间为95%。结果:我们的分析包括11项试验,共有1999名参与者。研究结果表明,BDQ+ lzd含方案产生显著更高的有利治疗结果(84.5%;95% CI, 79.8%-88.2%)和较低的不良结局(15.4%;95% ci, 11.6%-20.2%)。相比之下,缺乏LZD或BDQ的方案疗效较低,有利结果为66.8% (95% CI, 59.5%-73.4%),不利结果为33.0% (95% CI, 25.6%-41.4%)。结论:包括BDQ和LZD在内的耐多药结核病治疗方案可显著改善患者预后。BDQ和LZD的联合杀菌和蛋白质合成抑制作用创造了强大的治疗协同作用。添加pretomanid进一步增强了这种有效性,突出了其在复杂情况下的价值。未来的研究应侧重于优化这些方案的安全性和有效性,并探索辅助疗法,以进一步改善耐多药结核病的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信