Role of artificial intelligence in predicting the renal function after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04467-5
Mohamed Javid, Mahmoud Eldefrawy, Sai Raghavendra Sridhar, Mukesh Roy, Muni Rubens, Murugesan Manoharan
{"title":"Role of artificial intelligence in predicting the renal function after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Javid, Mahmoud Eldefrawy, Sai Raghavendra Sridhar, Mukesh Roy, Muni Rubens, Murugesan Manoharan","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04467-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore and assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the postoperative renal function in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies that used AI models to predict renal function after nephrectomy were included in our review. The details of different AI models, the input variables used to train and validate them, and the output generated from these models were recorded and analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the screening, a total of nine studies were included for the final analysis. The most common AI algorithms that were used to predict were based on machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and XGBoost. Different performance metrics of various AI models were analysed. The pooled AUROC (area under the receiver operating curve) of the AI models was 0.79 (0.75-0.84), I<sup>2</sup> = 15.26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI models exhibit significant potential for determining postoperative renal function in RCC patients. They integrate multimodal data to generate more accurate results. However, standardising the methodologies and reporting, utilising diverse datasets, and improving model interpretability can lead to widespread clinical adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"3097-3106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04467-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore and assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the postoperative renal function in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing nephrectomy.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies that used AI models to predict renal function after nephrectomy were included in our review. The details of different AI models, the input variables used to train and validate them, and the output generated from these models were recorded and analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

Results: After the screening, a total of nine studies were included for the final analysis. The most common AI algorithms that were used to predict were based on machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and XGBoost. Different performance metrics of various AI models were analysed. The pooled AUROC (area under the receiver operating curve) of the AI models was 0.79 (0.75-0.84), I2 = 15.26%.

Conclusion: AI models exhibit significant potential for determining postoperative renal function in RCC patients. They integrate multimodal data to generate more accurate results. However, standardising the methodologies and reporting, utilising diverse datasets, and improving model interpretability can lead to widespread clinical adaptation.

人工智能在预测肾细胞癌肾切除术后肾功能中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨人工智能(AI)在肾细胞癌(RCC)患者肾切除术后肾功能预测中的作用。方法:在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science等多个数据库中进行文献检索。在整个系统评价和荟萃分析过程中遵循PRISMA指南。使用人工智能模型预测肾切除术后肾功能的研究被纳入我们的综述。记录和分析了不同人工智能模型的细节,用于训练和验证它们的输入变量,以及这些模型产生的输出。使用预测模型研究偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险。结果:筛选后,共纳入9项研究进行最终分析。用于预测的最常见的人工智能算法是基于机器学习模型,即随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和XGBoost。分析了不同人工智能模型的不同性能指标。人工智能模型的合并AUROC(受试者工作曲线下面积)为0.79 (0.75 ~ 0.84),I2 = 15.26%。结论:人工智能模型在确定肾细胞癌患者术后肾功能方面具有重要的潜力。他们整合多模态数据以产生更准确的结果。然而,标准化的方法和报告,利用不同的数据集,提高模型的可解释性可以导致广泛的临床适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信