Role of artificial intelligence in predicting the renal function after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mohamed Javid, Mahmoud Eldefrawy, Sai Raghavendra Sridhar, Mukesh Roy, Muni Rubens, Murugesan Manoharan
{"title":"Role of artificial intelligence in predicting the renal function after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Javid, Mahmoud Eldefrawy, Sai Raghavendra Sridhar, Mukesh Roy, Muni Rubens, Murugesan Manoharan","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04467-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore and assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the postoperative renal function in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies that used AI models to predict renal function after nephrectomy were included in our review. The details of different AI models, the input variables used to train and validate them, and the output generated from these models were recorded and analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the screening, a total of nine studies were included for the final analysis. The most common AI algorithms that were used to predict were based on machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and XGBoost. Different performance metrics of various AI models were analysed. The pooled AUROC (area under the receiver operating curve) of the AI models was 0.79 (0.75-0.84), I<sup>2</sup> = 15.26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI models exhibit significant potential for determining postoperative renal function in RCC patients. They integrate multimodal data to generate more accurate results. However, standardising the methodologies and reporting, utilising diverse datasets, and improving model interpretability can lead to widespread clinical adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04467-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore and assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting the postoperative renal function in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) patients undergoing nephrectomy.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies that used AI models to predict renal function after nephrectomy were included in our review. The details of different AI models, the input variables used to train and validate them, and the output generated from these models were recorded and analysed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

Results: After the screening, a total of nine studies were included for the final analysis. The most common AI algorithms that were used to predict were based on machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and XGBoost. Different performance metrics of various AI models were analysed. The pooled AUROC (area under the receiver operating curve) of the AI models was 0.79 (0.75-0.84), I2 = 15.26%.

Conclusion: AI models exhibit significant potential for determining postoperative renal function in RCC patients. They integrate multimodal data to generate more accurate results. However, standardising the methodologies and reporting, utilising diverse datasets, and improving model interpretability can lead to widespread clinical adaptation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信