{"title":"Automated Whole-Liver Fat Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction Map: A Prospective Study in Taiwan.","authors":"Chih-Horng Wu, Kuang-Chen Yen, Li-Ying Wang, Ping-Lun Hsieh, Wei-Kai Wu, Pei-Lin Lee, Chun-Jen Liu","doi":"10.5009/gnl240408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a proton density fat fraction (PDFF) sequence is the most accurate, noninvasive method for assessing hepatic steatosis. However, manual measurement on the PDFF map is time-consuming. This study aimed to validate automated whole-liver fat quantification for assessing hepatic steatosis with MRI-PDFF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 80 patients were enrolled from August 2020 to January 2023. Baseline MRI-PDFF and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data were collected. The analysis of MRI-PDFF included values from automated whole-liver segmentation (autoPDFF) and the average value from measurements taken from eight segments (avePDFF). Twenty patients with ≥10% autoPDFF values who received 24 weeks of exercise training were also collected for the chronologic evaluation. The correlation and concordance coefficients (r and ρ) among the values and differences were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were strong correlations between autoPDFF versus avePDFF, autoPDFF versus MRS, and avePDFF versus MRS (r=0.963, r=0.955, and r=0.977, all p<0.001). The autoPDFF values were also highly concordant with the avePDFF and MRS values (ρ=0.941 and ρ=0.942). The autoPDFF, avePDFF, and MRS values consistently decreased after 24 weeks of exercise. The change in autoPDFF was also highly correlated with the changes in avePDFF and MRS (r=0.961 and r=0.870, all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated whole-liver fat quantification might be feasible for clinical trials and practice, yielding values with high correlations and concordance with the time-consuming manual measurements from the PDFF map and the values from the highly complex processing of MRS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04463667).</p>","PeriodicalId":12885,"journal":{"name":"Gut and Liver","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut and Liver","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a proton density fat fraction (PDFF) sequence is the most accurate, noninvasive method for assessing hepatic steatosis. However, manual measurement on the PDFF map is time-consuming. This study aimed to validate automated whole-liver fat quantification for assessing hepatic steatosis with MRI-PDFF.
Methods: In this prospective study, 80 patients were enrolled from August 2020 to January 2023. Baseline MRI-PDFF and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data were collected. The analysis of MRI-PDFF included values from automated whole-liver segmentation (autoPDFF) and the average value from measurements taken from eight segments (avePDFF). Twenty patients with ≥10% autoPDFF values who received 24 weeks of exercise training were also collected for the chronologic evaluation. The correlation and concordance coefficients (r and ρ) among the values and differences were calculated.
Results: There were strong correlations between autoPDFF versus avePDFF, autoPDFF versus MRS, and avePDFF versus MRS (r=0.963, r=0.955, and r=0.977, all p<0.001). The autoPDFF values were also highly concordant with the avePDFF and MRS values (ρ=0.941 and ρ=0.942). The autoPDFF, avePDFF, and MRS values consistently decreased after 24 weeks of exercise. The change in autoPDFF was also highly correlated with the changes in avePDFF and MRS (r=0.961 and r=0.870, all p<0.001).
Conclusions: Automated whole-liver fat quantification might be feasible for clinical trials and practice, yielding values with high correlations and concordance with the time-consuming manual measurements from the PDFF map and the values from the highly complex processing of MRS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04463667).
期刊介绍:
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut and Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Gut and Liver is jointly owned and operated by 8 affiliated societies in the field of gastroenterology, namely: the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer.