The Olive Strategy: Improved Pulmonary Vein Isolation Durability With the Pentaspline Pulsed Field Catheter.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
David Schaack, Lukas Urbanek, Stefano Bordignon, Joseph Kheir, Andrea Urbani, Shota Tohoku, Jun Hirokami, Karin Plank, Shaojie Chen, Boris Schmidt, K R Julian Chun
{"title":"The Olive Strategy: Improved Pulmonary Vein Isolation Durability With the Pentaspline Pulsed Field Catheter.","authors":"David Schaack, Lukas Urbanek, Stefano Bordignon, Joseph Kheir, Andrea Urbani, Shota Tohoku, Jun Hirokami, Karin Plank, Shaojie Chen, Boris Schmidt, K R Julian Chun","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pentaspline pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter is rapidly gaining popularity as a tool for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Its standard ablation protocol recommends applying 8 applications per pulmonary vein (PV) with 2 different catheter configurations: the flower and the basket shape. Using this protocol, the rate of durably isolated PVs during repeat procedures is not superior to that after conventional thermal PVI.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to improve PVI durability with the pentaspline PFA catheter through an extension of the ablation protocol and the introduction of a novel catheter shape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We added 2 applications in a small olive-shaped catheter configuration, leading to a total of 10 applications per PV. Procedural data, safety data, and remapping data from patients undergoing repeat procedures and clinical outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 consecutive patients were treated with the new olive strategy. In patients undergoing repeat procedures, PV reconnection was significantly less frequent after PVI with the olive strategy (13.6% [3 of 22 patients]) than after the conventional strategy (45% [36 of 80 patients]; P = 0.007). Procedure-related complications occurred in 11 (2.75%) of 400 patients. Comparison of 100 patients treated with the olive strategy vs 100 propensity score-matched conventional patients found no difference in freedom of arrhythmia at 180 days after the procedure (olive strategy: 86%; conventional strategy: 87.3%; P = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report on the initial clinical experience of a novel ablation protocol for PVI with the pentaspline PFA catheter. The Olive Strategy is safe to use and significantly improves PVI durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pentaspline pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter is rapidly gaining popularity as a tool for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Its standard ablation protocol recommends applying 8 applications per pulmonary vein (PV) with 2 different catheter configurations: the flower and the basket shape. Using this protocol, the rate of durably isolated PVs during repeat procedures is not superior to that after conventional thermal PVI.

Objectives: This study aimed to improve PVI durability with the pentaspline PFA catheter through an extension of the ablation protocol and the introduction of a novel catheter shape.

Methods: We added 2 applications in a small olive-shaped catheter configuration, leading to a total of 10 applications per PV. Procedural data, safety data, and remapping data from patients undergoing repeat procedures and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 400 consecutive patients were treated with the new olive strategy. In patients undergoing repeat procedures, PV reconnection was significantly less frequent after PVI with the olive strategy (13.6% [3 of 22 patients]) than after the conventional strategy (45% [36 of 80 patients]; P = 0.007). Procedure-related complications occurred in 11 (2.75%) of 400 patients. Comparison of 100 patients treated with the olive strategy vs 100 propensity score-matched conventional patients found no difference in freedom of arrhythmia at 180 days after the procedure (olive strategy: 86%; conventional strategy: 87.3%; P = 0.75).

Conclusions: We report on the initial clinical experience of a novel ablation protocol for PVI with the pentaspline PFA catheter. The Olive Strategy is safe to use and significantly improves PVI durability.

背景:五轴脉冲场消融(PFA)导管作为肺静脉隔离(PVI)的一种工具,正在迅速普及。其标准消融方案建议在每个肺静脉(PV)上应用 8 个导管,并采用两种不同的导管配置:花形和篮形。使用该方案,重复手术中持久隔离肺静脉的比率并不优于传统热PVI:本研究旨在通过扩展消融方案和引入新型导管形状,提高五棘 PFA 导管的 PVI 持久性:方法: 我们在小橄榄形导管配置中增加了 2 次应用,使每个 PV 共应用 10 次。我们分析了重复手术患者的手术数据、安全性数据和再映射数据以及临床结果:结果:共有 400 名患者连续接受了新的橄榄型导管治疗。在接受重复手术的患者中,使用橄榄型策略进行 PVI 后 PV 再连接的发生率(13.6% [22 例患者中的 3 例])明显低于传统策略(45% [80 例患者中的 36 例];P = 0.007)。400 例患者中有 11 例(2.75%)出现了手术相关并发症。将 100 名接受橄榄型策略治疗的患者与 100 名倾向评分匹配的常规患者进行比较,发现在术后 180 天内无心律失常的比例没有差异(橄榄型策略:86%;常规策略:87.3%;P = 0.75):我们报告了使用五线 PFA 导管进行 PVI 的新型消融方案的初步临床经验。Olive 策略使用安全,并能显著提高 PVI 的耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信