Children's perspectives on sugary snacks through elicitation techniques - repertory grid and generative method.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1342127
Linglin Liang, Yue Yu
{"title":"Children's perspectives on sugary snacks through elicitation techniques - repertory grid and generative method.","authors":"Linglin Liang, Yue Yu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1342127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugary snacks are prevalent in children's daily lives and may impact their diet positively or negatively, yet few studies explore children's perceptions and attitudes of these foods from their daily experiences in China.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to (i) assess children's perceptions and attitudes of sugary snacks and (ii) compare two child-centered elicitation techniques-Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) and Generative Method (GM)-based on Personal Construct Theory (PCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with 31 children (6-10 years old) in Hangzhou and Fuzhou, China. Children participated in RGT (dichotomous comparisons using product cards) and GM (creative expression through drawing/clay) in one-on-one sections. The output of the task was analyzed for thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes identified included sensory, packaging, interaction, emotion, cognition, and socio-culture. Children expressed concern about food composition and showed limited understanding of sugar's functions and cultural significance. The RGT elicited more product attributes (358 vs. 190 in GM), with a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). RGT generated a balanced mix of concrete and abstract attributes, while GM elicited more abstract attributes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight that children can be educated about the formulation and cultural aspects of sugary snacks. Encouraging richer \"in-mouth\" and \"in-body\" interactive education could be beneficial. Adopting a child-centered approach fosters engaging conversations. RGT efficiently inspires children to generate both concrete and abstract product attributes and is easy to understand but less enjoyable. On the other hand, GM tends to generate more abstract and novel ideas that strongly reflect children's preferences. However, it requires more time and cognitive effort to understand, though it maintains a higher level of enjoyment and engagement. Understanding these findings aids in developing nutrition education that captivates and engages children. Insights into elicitation techniques can guide researchers seeking to understand children's perspectives effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1342127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1342127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sugary snacks are prevalent in children's daily lives and may impact their diet positively or negatively, yet few studies explore children's perceptions and attitudes of these foods from their daily experiences in China.

Aims: This study aims to (i) assess children's perceptions and attitudes of sugary snacks and (ii) compare two child-centered elicitation techniques-Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) and Generative Method (GM)-based on Personal Construct Theory (PCT).

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 31 children (6-10 years old) in Hangzhou and Fuzhou, China. Children participated in RGT (dichotomous comparisons using product cards) and GM (creative expression through drawing/clay) in one-on-one sections. The output of the task was analyzed for thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.

Results: Themes identified included sensory, packaging, interaction, emotion, cognition, and socio-culture. Children expressed concern about food composition and showed limited understanding of sugar's functions and cultural significance. The RGT elicited more product attributes (358 vs. 190 in GM), with a significant difference (p < 0.001). RGT generated a balanced mix of concrete and abstract attributes, while GM elicited more abstract attributes.

Conclusion: The findings highlight that children can be educated about the formulation and cultural aspects of sugary snacks. Encouraging richer "in-mouth" and "in-body" interactive education could be beneficial. Adopting a child-centered approach fosters engaging conversations. RGT efficiently inspires children to generate both concrete and abstract product attributes and is easy to understand but less enjoyable. On the other hand, GM tends to generate more abstract and novel ideas that strongly reflect children's preferences. However, it requires more time and cognitive effort to understand, though it maintains a higher level of enjoyment and engagement. Understanding these findings aids in developing nutrition education that captivates and engages children. Insights into elicitation techniques can guide researchers seeking to understand children's perspectives effectively.

背景:目的:本研究旨在(i)评估儿童对含糖零食的看法和态度;(ii)基于个人建构理论(PCT),比较两种以儿童为中心的诱导技术--悔悟网格法(RGT)和生成法(GM):在中国杭州和福州对 31 名儿童(6-10 岁)进行了定性研究。儿童以一对一的形式参与了 RGT(使用产品卡进行二分比较)和 GM(通过绘画/粘土进行创造性表达)。我们对任务输出进行了主题分析和描述性统计:确定的主题包括感官、包装、互动、情感、认知和社会文化。儿童对食品成分表示担忧,对糖的功能和文化意义的理解有限。RGT 诱导了更多的产品属性(358 个,而 GM 诱导了 190 个),两者差异显著(p 结论:RGT 诱导了更多的产品属性(358 个,而 GM 诱导了 190 个),两者差异显著(p 结论):研究结果强调,可以对儿童进行有关含糖零食的配方和文化方面的教育。鼓励更丰富的 "口中 "和 "体内 "互动教育可能会有所裨益。采用以儿童为中心的方法可促进参与式对话。RGT 能有效启发儿童产生具体和抽象的产品属性,易于理解,但不太令人愉快。另一方面,GM 往往能产生更抽象、更新颖的想法,强烈反映儿童的喜好。然而,它需要更多的时间和认知努力来理解,尽管它能保持较高的趣味性和参与度。了解这些发现有助于开发吸引儿童并使其参与其中的营养教育。对诱导技术的了解可以指导研究人员有效地了解儿童的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信