{"title":"Children's perspectives on sugary snacks through elicitation techniques - repertory grid and generative method.","authors":"Linglin Liang, Yue Yu","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1342127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugary snacks are prevalent in children's daily lives and may impact their diet positively or negatively, yet few studies explore children's perceptions and attitudes of these foods from their daily experiences in China.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to (i) assess children's perceptions and attitudes of sugary snacks and (ii) compare two child-centered elicitation techniques-Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) and Generative Method (GM)-based on Personal Construct Theory (PCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with 31 children (6-10 years old) in Hangzhou and Fuzhou, China. Children participated in RGT (dichotomous comparisons using product cards) and GM (creative expression through drawing/clay) in one-on-one sections. The output of the task was analyzed for thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes identified included sensory, packaging, interaction, emotion, cognition, and socio-culture. Children expressed concern about food composition and showed limited understanding of sugar's functions and cultural significance. The RGT elicited more product attributes (358 vs. 190 in GM), with a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). RGT generated a balanced mix of concrete and abstract attributes, while GM elicited more abstract attributes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight that children can be educated about the formulation and cultural aspects of sugary snacks. Encouraging richer \"in-mouth\" and \"in-body\" interactive education could be beneficial. Adopting a child-centered approach fosters engaging conversations. RGT efficiently inspires children to generate both concrete and abstract product attributes and is easy to understand but less enjoyable. On the other hand, GM tends to generate more abstract and novel ideas that strongly reflect children's preferences. However, it requires more time and cognitive effort to understand, though it maintains a higher level of enjoyment and engagement. Understanding these findings aids in developing nutrition education that captivates and engages children. Insights into elicitation techniques can guide researchers seeking to understand children's perspectives effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1342127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1342127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sugary snacks are prevalent in children's daily lives and may impact their diet positively or negatively, yet few studies explore children's perceptions and attitudes of these foods from their daily experiences in China.
Aims: This study aims to (i) assess children's perceptions and attitudes of sugary snacks and (ii) compare two child-centered elicitation techniques-Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) and Generative Method (GM)-based on Personal Construct Theory (PCT).
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 31 children (6-10 years old) in Hangzhou and Fuzhou, China. Children participated in RGT (dichotomous comparisons using product cards) and GM (creative expression through drawing/clay) in one-on-one sections. The output of the task was analyzed for thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.
Results: Themes identified included sensory, packaging, interaction, emotion, cognition, and socio-culture. Children expressed concern about food composition and showed limited understanding of sugar's functions and cultural significance. The RGT elicited more product attributes (358 vs. 190 in GM), with a significant difference (p < 0.001). RGT generated a balanced mix of concrete and abstract attributes, while GM elicited more abstract attributes.
Conclusion: The findings highlight that children can be educated about the formulation and cultural aspects of sugary snacks. Encouraging richer "in-mouth" and "in-body" interactive education could be beneficial. Adopting a child-centered approach fosters engaging conversations. RGT efficiently inspires children to generate both concrete and abstract product attributes and is easy to understand but less enjoyable. On the other hand, GM tends to generate more abstract and novel ideas that strongly reflect children's preferences. However, it requires more time and cognitive effort to understand, though it maintains a higher level of enjoyment and engagement. Understanding these findings aids in developing nutrition education that captivates and engages children. Insights into elicitation techniques can guide researchers seeking to understand children's perspectives effectively.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.