The effect of acetabular shell and liner design on posterior horizontal dislocation distance in modern dual-mobility implants.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Nathaniel T Ondeck, Drake G LeBrun, Shammodip Roy, Ahmad Faizan, Geoffrey H Westrich
{"title":"The effect of acetabular shell and liner design on posterior horizontal dislocation distance in modern dual-mobility implants.","authors":"Nathaniel T Ondeck, Drake G LeBrun, Shammodip Roy, Ahmad Faizan, Geoffrey H Westrich","doi":"10.1177/11207000251329269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The posterior horizontal dislocation distance (PHDD) is a 3-dimensional jump distance measurement that is relevant to the risk of dislocation. There are a number of dual-mobility (DM) constructs with varying designs available. The present study identifies design factors associated with increased PHDD and evaluates the PHDD of 3 DM implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3 different computer-aided implant designs were virtually implanted within a 3-dimensional CT-derived pelvic model. Each design represented an analogue of a DM system (MDM, OR3O, and G7) according to specific variations in acetabular liner rim build-up and femoral head centre location. The effective head diameters and PHDD values were calculated for each size acetabular shell and DM design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rim build-up design (MDM) showed higher PHDD values as compared to the other 2 hemispherical rim designs with no build-up, across all studied shell sizes. Specifically, the MDM design analogue had 16.4-29.0% greater PHDD values than the OR3O design analog and 15.2-30.5% greater PHDD values than the G7 design analogue The effect of a sfemoral head centre location relative to the liner head centre (OR3O) was negated by a larger effective head diameter to shell diameter ratio of the G7 design, resulting in similar PHDD values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Design parameters affect the PHDD values of DM cups. The use of an elevated rim was associated with greater PHDD values. A medialised femoral head centre should also improve PHDD values, but the effect was nullified due to consecutive lower effective head diameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000251329269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251329269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The posterior horizontal dislocation distance (PHDD) is a 3-dimensional jump distance measurement that is relevant to the risk of dislocation. There are a number of dual-mobility (DM) constructs with varying designs available. The present study identifies design factors associated with increased PHDD and evaluates the PHDD of 3 DM implants.

Methods: 3 different computer-aided implant designs were virtually implanted within a 3-dimensional CT-derived pelvic model. Each design represented an analogue of a DM system (MDM, OR3O, and G7) according to specific variations in acetabular liner rim build-up and femoral head centre location. The effective head diameters and PHDD values were calculated for each size acetabular shell and DM design.

Results: The positive rim build-up design (MDM) showed higher PHDD values as compared to the other 2 hemispherical rim designs with no build-up, across all studied shell sizes. Specifically, the MDM design analogue had 16.4-29.0% greater PHDD values than the OR3O design analog and 15.2-30.5% greater PHDD values than the G7 design analogue The effect of a sfemoral head centre location relative to the liner head centre (OR3O) was negated by a larger effective head diameter to shell diameter ratio of the G7 design, resulting in similar PHDD values.

Conclusions: Design parameters affect the PHDD values of DM cups. The use of an elevated rim was associated with greater PHDD values. A medialised femoral head centre should also improve PHDD values, but the effect was nullified due to consecutive lower effective head diameters.

现代双活动假体髋臼壳和内衬设计对后路水平脱位距离的影响。
背景:后侧水平脱位距离(PHDD)是一种与脱位风险相关的三维跳跃距离测量。有许多具有不同设计的双移动性(DM)结构。本研究确定了与PHDD增加相关的设计因素,并评估了3dm植入物的PHDD。方法:3种不同的计算机辅助植入物设计在三维ct衍生的骨盆模型中虚拟植入。每种设计都代表了DM系统的模拟(MDM、or30和G7),根据髋臼衬套边缘构建和股骨头中心位置的特定变化。计算不同尺寸髋臼和DM设计的有效头直径和PHDD值。结果:在所有研究的外壳尺寸中,与其他两种没有建立的半球形边缘设计相比,积极的边缘构建设计(MDM)显示出更高的PHDD值。具体来说,MDM设计模拟物的PHDD值比or30设计模拟物高16.4-29.0%,比G7设计模拟物的PHDD值高15.2-30.5%。G7设计物的有效头径与壳径比更大,抵消了相对于衬管头中心(or30)的股骨头中心位置的影响,导致相似的PHDD值。结论:设计参数影响DM杯的PHDD值。使用升高的轮辋与更高的PHDD值相关。股骨头中心中间化也可以改善PHDD值,但由于连续降低有效股骨头直径,效果无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信