Imaging strategies for patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Stefan Huber-Wagner, Rainer Braunschweig, Daniela Kildal, Dan Bieler, Barbara Prediger, Miriam Hertwig, Charlotte Kugler, Stefan Reske, Thomas Wurmb, Gerhard Achatz, Benedikt Friemert, Carsten Schoeneberg
{"title":"Imaging strategies for patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.","authors":"Stefan Huber-Wagner, Rainer Braunschweig, Daniela Kildal, Dan Bieler, Barbara Prediger, Miriam Hertwig, Charlotte Kugler, Stefan Reske, Thomas Wurmb, Gerhard Achatz, Benedikt Friemert, Carsten Schoeneberg","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02840-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to develop new evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for imaging strategies in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to August 2021.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room, randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and comparative registry studies; comparison of interventions for imaging strategies; patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as diagnostic test accuracy and mortality. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as diagnostic test accuracy and mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies with a total of 55,227 patients were identified. There were studies with low risk (n = 2), high risk (n = 5) and unclear risk of bias (n = 14). Relevant topics were sonographic imaging of the chest and abdomen (n = 8 studies), X-ray of the chest (n = 1), indications for whole-body computed tomography (n = 6), CT scanner location (n = 1), whole-body computed tomography in haemodynamically unstable patients (n = 3), and prehospital sonography (n = 2). There were studies with low risk (n = 2), high risk (n = 5) and unclear risk of bias (n = 14). One new recommendation was developed, six were modified. All achieved strong consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma should be performed for diagnostic purposes after blunt and/or penetrating thoracic and/or abdominal trauma as part of the primary survey in the resuscitation room, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) gains highest importance as part of the diagnostic procedures for severely injured patients. WBCT with a trauma-specific protocol must be performed in a timely manner if the patient does not require an immediate intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging can be indicated as a further primary diagnostic tool for specific conditions. Two studies were judged to be of low risk of bias in all domains. The risk of selection bias was high in two studies and unclear in seven studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02840-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our aim was to develop new evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for imaging strategies in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to August 2021.

Inclusion criteria: patients with multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room, randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and comparative registry studies; comparison of interventions for imaging strategies; patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as diagnostic test accuracy and mortality. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as diagnostic test accuracy and mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.

Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 55,227 patients were identified. There were studies with low risk (n = 2), high risk (n = 5) and unclear risk of bias (n = 14). Relevant topics were sonographic imaging of the chest and abdomen (n = 8 studies), X-ray of the chest (n = 1), indications for whole-body computed tomography (n = 6), CT scanner location (n = 1), whole-body computed tomography in haemodynamically unstable patients (n = 3), and prehospital sonography (n = 2). There were studies with low risk (n = 2), high risk (n = 5) and unclear risk of bias (n = 14). One new recommendation was developed, six were modified. All achieved strong consensus.

Conclusion: While extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma should be performed for diagnostic purposes after blunt and/or penetrating thoracic and/or abdominal trauma as part of the primary survey in the resuscitation room, whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) gains highest importance as part of the diagnostic procedures for severely injured patients. WBCT with a trauma-specific protocol must be performed in a timely manner if the patient does not require an immediate intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging can be indicated as a further primary diagnostic tool for specific conditions. Two studies were judged to be of low risk of bias in all domains. The risk of selection bias was high in two studies and unclear in seven studies.

复苏室多发和/或严重损伤患者的影像学策略:系统综述和临床实践指南更新
目的:我们的目的是为复苏室多发和/或严重损伤患者的影像学策略制定新的循证和基于共识的建议。该指南主题是德国多发性和/或重度损伤患者治疗指南2022年更新的一部分。方法:系统检索MEDLINE和Embase至2021年8月。纳入标准:复苏室多发和/或严重损伤患者、随机对照试验、前瞻性队列研究、横断面研究和比较登记研究;影像策略干预措施的比较;与患者相关的临床结果,如诊断测试的准确性和死亡率。进一步的文献报告来自临床专家。我们考虑了与患者相关的临床结果,如诊断测试的准确性和死亡率。使用NICE 2012检查表评估偏倚风险。证据以叙述的方式综合,专家共识被用来制定建议并确定其力度。结果:21项研究共纳入55,227例患者。有低风险(n = 2)、高风险(n = 5)和不明确偏倚风险(n = 14)的研究。相关主题为胸腹超声成像(n = 8)、胸部x线片(n = 1)、全身计算机断层扫描适应症(n = 6)、CT扫描仪定位(n = 1)、血流动力学不稳定患者的全身计算机断层扫描(n = 3)和院前超声检查(n = 2)。有低风险(n = 2)、高风险(n = 5)和不明确偏倚风险(n = 14)的研究。提出了一项新的建议,修改了六项。各方达成强烈共识。结论:在钝性和/或穿透性胸部和/或腹部创伤后,作为复苏室主要调查的一部分,超声对创伤的扩展集中评估应用于诊断目的,而全身计算机断层扫描(WBCT)作为严重损伤患者诊断程序的一部分最为重要。如果患者不需要立即干预,则必须及时进行具有创伤特异性协议的WBCT。磁共振成像可以作为一种进一步的主要诊断工具用于特定的条件。两项研究在所有领域被判定为低偏倚风险。两项研究的选择偏倚风险较高,七项研究的选择偏倚风险不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信