Enhancing ophthalmology students' awareness of retinitis pigmentosa: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted teaching of rare diseases-a quasi-experimental study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1534294
Jiamu Zeng, Kexin Sun, Peng Qin, Shulin Liu
{"title":"Enhancing ophthalmology students' awareness of retinitis pigmentosa: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted teaching of rare diseases-a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Jiamu Zeng, Kexin Sun, Peng Qin, Shulin Liu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1534294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a rare retinal dystrophy often underrepresented in ophthalmology education. Despite advancements in diagnostics and treatments like gene therapy, RP knowledge gaps persist. This study assesses the efficacy of AI-assisted teaching using ChatGPT compared to traditional methods in educating students about RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 142 medical students randomly assigned to control (traditional review materials) and ChatGPT groups. Both groups attended a lecture on RP and completed pre- and post-tests. Statistical analyses compared learning outcomes, review times, and response accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups significantly improved in post-test scores (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but the ChatGPT group required less review time (24.29 ± 12.62 vs. 42.54 ± 20.43 min, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The ChatGPT group also performed better on complex questions regarding advanced RP treatments, demonstrating AI's potential to deliver accurate and current information efficiently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT enhances learning efficiency and comprehension of rare diseases like RP. A hybrid educational model combining AI with traditional methods can address knowledge gaps, offering a promising approach for modern medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1534294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1534294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a rare retinal dystrophy often underrepresented in ophthalmology education. Despite advancements in diagnostics and treatments like gene therapy, RP knowledge gaps persist. This study assesses the efficacy of AI-assisted teaching using ChatGPT compared to traditional methods in educating students about RP.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 142 medical students randomly assigned to control (traditional review materials) and ChatGPT groups. Both groups attended a lecture on RP and completed pre- and post-tests. Statistical analyses compared learning outcomes, review times, and response accuracy.

Results: Both groups significantly improved in post-test scores (p < 0.001), but the ChatGPT group required less review time (24.29 ± 12.62 vs. 42.54 ± 20.43 min, p < 0.0001). The ChatGPT group also performed better on complex questions regarding advanced RP treatments, demonstrating AI's potential to deliver accurate and current information efficiently.

Conclusion: ChatGPT enhances learning efficiency and comprehension of rare diseases like RP. A hybrid educational model combining AI with traditional methods can address knowledge gaps, offering a promising approach for modern medical education.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信