The impact of individual and contextual socioeconomic factors on colorectal cancer screening adherence in Turin, Italy: a multilevel analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stefano Rousset, Elena Strippoli, Carlo Senore, Teresa Spadea, Marco Calcagno, Nicolás Zengarini, Gianluigi Ferrante
{"title":"The impact of individual and contextual socioeconomic factors on colorectal cancer screening adherence in Turin, Italy: a multilevel analysis.","authors":"Stefano Rousset, Elena Strippoli, Carlo Senore, Teresa Spadea, Marco Calcagno, Nicolás Zengarini, Gianluigi Ferrante","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22396-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening participation can be influenced by both individual socioeconomic position and contextual factors. In Italy, disparities exist regarding screening adherence, but it is important to understand the specific factors driving these disparities in specific locations according to different screening protocols. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of individual and contextual socio-economic factors on adherence to the organized colorectal cancer screening in the city of Turin, Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study on the population of assisted residents in Turin, eligible for colorectal screening from January 2010- June 2019. Colorectal screening in Piedmont involved inviting 58-year-old individuals to undergo a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) or, in case of non-adherence, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT). The program also included another protocol based directly on FIT as the first test. Adherence to the two screening protocols according to demographic/socioeconomic characteristics and contextual factors was evaluated with multilevel Poisson models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90,227 eligible subjects (53% females) were analysed exploring adherence to FS/FIT. Lower likelihood of participation was found among males from High-Migratory-Pressure-Countries (HMPC), subjects with the lowest educational level, unemployed individuals, subjects living in rented houses, living alone/cohabiting and single parents. Among males, retirees and subjects living in more deprived areas participated more. 36,674 subjects (53% females) were analysed exploring adherence to the first FIT invitation. Adherence rate was higher among women (40% vs. 36%). Lower likelihood of participation was found among HMPC immigrants, males with the lowest educational level, people living in rented accommodation, living alone/cohabiting and single parents. Higher participation was found in retirees. In males, no differences were found between subjects living in more and less deprived areas, but a different likelihood of participation was observed across different areas of the city.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics influence access to organized colorectal screening in Turin. Immigrant status, low level of education, poor housing conditions and lack of social support, with some differences according to gender, emerged as the most significant barriers that should be tackled in order to increase screening participation and reduce inequalities. Contextual factors play a role only among male subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22396-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Screening participation can be influenced by both individual socioeconomic position and contextual factors. In Italy, disparities exist regarding screening adherence, but it is important to understand the specific factors driving these disparities in specific locations according to different screening protocols. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of individual and contextual socio-economic factors on adherence to the organized colorectal cancer screening in the city of Turin, Italy.

Methods: Retrospective observational study on the population of assisted residents in Turin, eligible for colorectal screening from January 2010- June 2019. Colorectal screening in Piedmont involved inviting 58-year-old individuals to undergo a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) or, in case of non-adherence, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT). The program also included another protocol based directly on FIT as the first test. Adherence to the two screening protocols according to demographic/socioeconomic characteristics and contextual factors was evaluated with multilevel Poisson models.

Results: 90,227 eligible subjects (53% females) were analysed exploring adherence to FS/FIT. Lower likelihood of participation was found among males from High-Migratory-Pressure-Countries (HMPC), subjects with the lowest educational level, unemployed individuals, subjects living in rented houses, living alone/cohabiting and single parents. Among males, retirees and subjects living in more deprived areas participated more. 36,674 subjects (53% females) were analysed exploring adherence to the first FIT invitation. Adherence rate was higher among women (40% vs. 36%). Lower likelihood of participation was found among HMPC immigrants, males with the lowest educational level, people living in rented accommodation, living alone/cohabiting and single parents. Higher participation was found in retirees. In males, no differences were found between subjects living in more and less deprived areas, but a different likelihood of participation was observed across different areas of the city.

Conclusions: Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics influence access to organized colorectal screening in Turin. Immigrant status, low level of education, poor housing conditions and lack of social support, with some differences according to gender, emerged as the most significant barriers that should be tackled in order to increase screening participation and reduce inequalities. Contextual factors play a role only among male subjects.

个体和背景社会经济因素对意大利都灵结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响:一项多水平分析。
背景:筛查参与可受个人社会经济地位和环境因素的影响。在意大利,筛查依从性存在差异,但根据不同的筛查方案,了解在特定地区导致这些差异的具体因素是很重要的。本研究的目的是确定意大利都灵市个人和环境社会经济因素对坚持有组织的结直肠癌筛查的影响。方法:对2010年1月至2019年6月都灵符合结肠直肠癌筛查条件的辅助居民进行回顾性观察研究。皮埃蒙特的结直肠筛查包括邀请58岁的个体接受柔性乙状结肠镜检查(FS),或者在不粘附的情况下进行粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)。该计划还包括另一个直接基于FIT的方案作为第一次测试。根据人口统计学/社会经济特征和背景因素对两种筛查方案的依从性进行多层次泊松模型评估。结果:90,227名符合条件的受试者(53%为女性)进行了FS/FIT依从性分析。来自高迁移压力国家(HMPC)的男性、受教育程度最低的受试者、失业个体、租房居住、独居/同居和单亲家庭的受试者参与的可能性较低。在男性中,退休人员和生活在更贫困地区的受试者参与的更多。分析了36674名受试者(53%为女性)对首次FIT邀请的依从性。女性的依从率更高(40%对36%)。在HMPC移民、受教育程度最低的男性、租房者、独居者/同居者和单亲父母中,参与的可能性较低。退休人员的参与率更高。在男性中,生活在较贫困地区和较贫困地区的受试者之间没有发现差异,但在城市的不同地区观察到不同的参与可能性。结论:在都灵,社会经济和人口统计学特征影响有组织结直肠筛查的可及性。移民身份、受教育程度低、住房条件差和缺乏社会支持,以及因性别不同而存在的一些差异,已成为应解决的最重大障碍,以便增加参与筛查和减少不平等现象。语境因素只在男性受试者中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信