Demographic Factor Analysis on the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Status of Nurses in Preventing Device-Related Pressure Injuries: A Multicentric Cross-sectional Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Qingli Jiang, Fang He, Xin Fu, Yuwei Yang, Huilin He, Mei He
{"title":"Demographic Factor Analysis on the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Status of Nurses in Preventing Device-Related Pressure Injuries: A Multicentric Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Qingli Jiang, Fang He, Xin Fu, Yuwei Yang, Huilin He, Mei He","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current status of the Device-Related Pressure Injuries Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (DRPI-KAP) survey among nurses and explore its demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The demographic questionnaire and appropriative DRPI-KAP scale were used to investigate 1,368 nurses from eight representative hospitals in Mianyang City, China.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,344 valid questionnaires were collected, yielding an effective response rate of 98.2% (1,344/1,368). The scores (score rates) of the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions and overall DRPI-KAP scale were 49.5 ± 12.1 (65.9%), 38.3 ± 5.6 (85.1%), 56.7 ± 10.0 (81.0%), and 144.4 ± 22.6 (76.0%), respectively. The Pearson and partial correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between scores on the DRPI knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions. After adjusting for the confounding effects of the three DPRI-KAP dimensions, the multiple linear stepwise regression analysis revealed that multiple demographic factors independently influenced the knowledge (eg, department, work years, received DRPI training, wound/stoma specialist nurse), attitude (eg, technical title, department), and practice (eg, position, technical title, wound/stoma specialist nurse, received DRPI training). Of them, the proactive DRPI attitude of pediatric nurses and the effective DRPI practices of frontline nurses were identified as innovative findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an urgent need for improvement in the knowledge of DRPI prevention among representative hospital nurses. Enhancing the knowledge training and management system is anticipated to cultivate professional attitude and practice, thereby elevating the DRPI nursing quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the current status of the Device-Related Pressure Injuries Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (DRPI-KAP) survey among nurses and explore its demographic factors.

Methods: The demographic questionnaire and appropriative DRPI-KAP scale were used to investigate 1,368 nurses from eight representative hospitals in Mianyang City, China.

Results: A total of 1,344 valid questionnaires were collected, yielding an effective response rate of 98.2% (1,344/1,368). The scores (score rates) of the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions and overall DRPI-KAP scale were 49.5 ± 12.1 (65.9%), 38.3 ± 5.6 (85.1%), 56.7 ± 10.0 (81.0%), and 144.4 ± 22.6 (76.0%), respectively. The Pearson and partial correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between scores on the DRPI knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions. After adjusting for the confounding effects of the three DPRI-KAP dimensions, the multiple linear stepwise regression analysis revealed that multiple demographic factors independently influenced the knowledge (eg, department, work years, received DRPI training, wound/stoma specialist nurse), attitude (eg, technical title, department), and practice (eg, position, technical title, wound/stoma specialist nurse, received DRPI training). Of them, the proactive DRPI attitude of pediatric nurses and the effective DRPI practices of frontline nurses were identified as innovative findings.

Conclusions: There is an urgent need for improvement in the knowledge of DRPI prevention among representative hospital nurses. Enhancing the knowledge training and management system is anticipated to cultivate professional attitude and practice, thereby elevating the DRPI nursing quality.

护士预防器械相关压力伤害知识、态度和实践状况的人口统计学因素分析:一项多中心横断面研究。
目的:了解护理人员器械相关压力伤害知识、态度和行为(DRPI-KAP)调查现状,并探讨其人口学因素。方法:采用人口统计问卷和专用DRPI-KAP量表对绵阳市8家代表性医院的1368名护士进行调查。结果:共回收有效问卷1344份,有效回复率为98.2%(1344 / 1368)。知识、态度、实践维度得分(得分率)和总体DRPI-KAP量表得分分别为49.5±12.1(65.9%)、38.3±5.6(85.1%)、56.7±10.0(81.0%)和144.4±22.6(76.0%)。Pearson和偏相关分析显示,DRPI知识、态度和实践维度的得分显著正相关。在调整DPRI-KAP三个维度的混杂效应后,多元线性逐步回归分析显示,多个人口学因素独立影响知识(如科室、工作年限、接受DRPI培训、伤口/造口专科护士)、态度(如技术职称、科室)和实践(如职位、技术职称、伤口/造口专科护士、接受DRPI培训)。其中,儿科护士积极主动的DRPI态度和一线护士有效的DRPI实践被认为是创新发现。结论:代表性医院护士对DRPI的预防知识亟待提高。通过加强知识培训和管理体系,培养专业态度和实践,提高DRPI护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信