Conventional DNA Extraction Followed by Real-Time PCR Had Higher Sensitivity for Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Clinical Samples Compared to Standard Methods.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angel Sebastian Rodriguez-Pazmiño, Bernardo Castro-Rodríguez, Greta Esther Cardenas-Franco, Greta Franco-Sotomayor, Elsy Carvajal, Joselyn Calderon, Darwin Santiago Paredes, Heidy Buenaño-Morales, Manuel González, Lina Macero, Rita García, Solon Alberto Orlando, Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain
{"title":"Conventional DNA Extraction Followed by Real-Time PCR Had Higher Sensitivity for Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Clinical Samples Compared to Standard Methods.","authors":"Angel Sebastian Rodriguez-Pazmiño, Bernardo Castro-Rodríguez, Greta Esther Cardenas-Franco, Greta Franco-Sotomayor, Elsy Carvajal, Joselyn Calderon, Darwin Santiago Paredes, Heidy Buenaño-Morales, Manuel González, Lina Macero, Rita García, Solon Alberto Orlando, Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), remains a significant global health challenge, with an estimated 10.8 million cases diagnosed and 1.25 million deaths in 2023, according to the WHO. In this context, enhancing TB case detection using more sensitive diagnostic methods is essential. Here, we compared the performance of two commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits with the reference standards of smear microscopy, culture, and Gene Xpert. By analyzing 402 clinical specimens, we found that conventional DNA extraction, followed by real-time PCR, using either of the two commercial kits provided the highest sensitivity for detecting MTBC. Positivity values of 48.98-60.07% and 50.34-53.24% were obtained with the commercial kits \"VIASURE MTBC + non tuberculous mycobacterias (NTM) Real-Time PCR Detection Kit\" (Certest, Spain) and \"ANYPLEX™ MTB/NTM Real-Time Detection Kit\" (Seegene, South Korea), respectively. In contrast, the reference standards yielded positivity values of 14.75% (smear microscopy), 32.65% (culture), and 28.95% (GeneXpert assay). These alternative methods should be considered as valuable tools to strengthen TB control and prevention strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1260-1263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), remains a significant global health challenge, with an estimated 10.8 million cases diagnosed and 1.25 million deaths in 2023, according to the WHO. In this context, enhancing TB case detection using more sensitive diagnostic methods is essential. Here, we compared the performance of two commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits with the reference standards of smear microscopy, culture, and Gene Xpert. By analyzing 402 clinical specimens, we found that conventional DNA extraction, followed by real-time PCR, using either of the two commercial kits provided the highest sensitivity for detecting MTBC. Positivity values of 48.98-60.07% and 50.34-53.24% were obtained with the commercial kits "VIASURE MTBC + non tuberculous mycobacterias (NTM) Real-Time PCR Detection Kit" (Certest, Spain) and "ANYPLEX™ MTB/NTM Real-Time Detection Kit" (Seegene, South Korea), respectively. In contrast, the reference standards yielded positivity values of 14.75% (smear microscopy), 32.65% (culture), and 28.95% (GeneXpert assay). These alternative methods should be considered as valuable tools to strengthen TB control and prevention strategy.

与标准方法相比,常规DNA提取后实时荧光定量PCR检测临床样品中结核分枝杆菌的灵敏度更高。
根据世界卫生组织的数据,结核病的病原体结核分枝杆菌复合体(MTBC)仍然是一个重大的全球卫生挑战,估计2023年确诊病例为1080万例,死亡人数为125万人。在这种情况下,使用更敏感的诊断方法加强结核病病例检测至关重要。在这里,我们比较了两种商用实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)试剂盒与涂片显微镜、培养和基因Xpert的参考标准的性能。通过分析402例临床标本,我们发现,使用两种商用试剂盒中的任何一种,常规DNA提取和实时PCR检测MTBC的灵敏度最高。“VIASURE MTBC +非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)实时PCR检测试剂盒”(西班牙Certest公司)和“ANYPLEX™MTB/NTM实时检测试剂盒”(韩国Seegene公司)的阳性率分别为48.98 ~ 60.07%和50.34 ~ 53.24%。相比之下,参考标准品的阳性率分别为14.75%(涂片镜检)、32.65%(培养)和28.95% (GeneXpert检测)。这些替代方法应被视为加强结核病控制和预防战略的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信