Influence of anxiety sensitivity on the observe facet of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire: differential item functioning in a clinical population.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Danielle Moskow Diamond, Joshua Curtiss, Joseph K Carpenter, Masaya Ito, Stefan G Hofmann
{"title":"Influence of anxiety sensitivity on the observe facet of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire: differential item functioning in a clinical population.","authors":"Danielle Moskow Diamond, Joshua Curtiss, Joseph K Carpenter, Masaya Ito, Stefan G Hofmann","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06488-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many individuals who engage in mindfulness experience decreased anxiety. Yet some individuals, particularly those with panic disorder (PD) or elevated anxiety sensitivity (AS), note heightened anxiety when observing particular sensations. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is one of the most widely utilized mindfulness questionnaires. However, its Observe facet has shown variability in the literature. This study explored a transdiagnostic approach to determine whether specific aspects of the Observe facet of the FFMQ differ in individuals with elevated anxiety sensitivity (AS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined a clinical sample of 1521 Japanese individuals who completed the FFMQ and Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 (ASI-3). A multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model approach was adopted utilizing latent variables to examine differential item functioning (DIF) of the Observe facet of the FFMQ, based on PD and/or AS diagnosis. This process was repeated to examine the relationship between the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) subscales and particular items of the Observe facet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurement model revealed good acceptability of a one-factor solution of the Observe facet (χ<sup>2</sup> (20) = 208.73, p < 0.001). PD significantly predicted Observe (B = 0.09, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, p = 0.008) and AS significantly predicted Observe (B = 0.02, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.18, p < 0.001). Increased AS was associated with greater scores on observing internal items and lower scores on observing external items. When PD and AS were analyzed simultaneously, only AS remained significant. The cognitive subscale showed the same pattern of results as the total ASI-3 subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study reveal that AS, particularly cognitive AS, may modulate the mindfulness experience. The study reveals the importance of understanding where an individual observes and its results may be beneficial for tailoring mindfulness interventions for individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06488-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many individuals who engage in mindfulness experience decreased anxiety. Yet some individuals, particularly those with panic disorder (PD) or elevated anxiety sensitivity (AS), note heightened anxiety when observing particular sensations. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is one of the most widely utilized mindfulness questionnaires. However, its Observe facet has shown variability in the literature. This study explored a transdiagnostic approach to determine whether specific aspects of the Observe facet of the FFMQ differ in individuals with elevated anxiety sensitivity (AS).

Methods: We examined a clinical sample of 1521 Japanese individuals who completed the FFMQ and Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 (ASI-3). A multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model approach was adopted utilizing latent variables to examine differential item functioning (DIF) of the Observe facet of the FFMQ, based on PD and/or AS diagnosis. This process was repeated to examine the relationship between the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) subscales and particular items of the Observe facet.

Results: The measurement model revealed good acceptability of a one-factor solution of the Observe facet (χ2 (20) = 208.73, p < 0.001). PD significantly predicted Observe (B = 0.09, R2 = 0.06, p = 0.008) and AS significantly predicted Observe (B = 0.02, R2 = 0.18, p < 0.001). Increased AS was associated with greater scores on observing internal items and lower scores on observing external items. When PD and AS were analyzed simultaneously, only AS remained significant. The cognitive subscale showed the same pattern of results as the total ASI-3 subscale.

Conclusions: The findings of this study reveal that AS, particularly cognitive AS, may modulate the mindfulness experience. The study reveals the importance of understanding where an individual observes and its results may be beneficial for tailoring mindfulness interventions for individuals.

焦虑敏感性对五方面正念问卷观察方面的影响:临床人群的差异项目功能。
背景许多进行正念训练的人都会减少焦虑。然而,有些人,尤其是患有惊恐障碍(PD)或焦虑敏感性增高(AS)的人,在观察特定感觉时会感到焦虑加剧。五面正念问卷(FFMQ)是使用最广泛的正念问卷之一。然而,其 "观察 "部分在文献中却显示出差异性。本研究探索了一种跨诊断方法,以确定焦虑敏感度(AS)升高的个体在 FFMQ 观察方面是否存在差异:我们对完成 FFMQ 和焦虑敏感性指数 3 (ASI-3) 的 1521 名日本人进行了临床抽样调查。我们采用了一种多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型方法,利用潜变量来研究 FFMQ 观察方面的差异项目功能(DIF),其依据是 PD 和/或 AS 诊断。重复这一过程,以检验焦虑敏感性指数-3(ASI-3)分量表与观察面特定项目之间的关系:测量模型显示,"观察 "面的单因素解具有良好的可接受性(χ2 (20) = 208.73, p 2 = 0.06, p = 0.008),AS 可显著预测 "观察"(B = 0.02, R2 = 0.18, p 结论:该研究结果显示,"观察 "面的单因素解具有良好的可接受性(χ2 (20) = 208.73, p 2 = 0.06, p = 0.008):本研究的结果表明,强直性脊柱炎,尤其是认知性强直性脊柱炎,可能会调节正念体验。该研究揭示了了解个体观察点的重要性,其结果可能有利于为个体量身定制正念干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信