Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Mazin Merdad, Nada Al Taylouni
{"title":"Salvage Laryngectomy in Clinically N0 Patients: Is Elective Neck Dissection Indicated?","authors":"Mazin Merdad,&nbsp;Nada Al Taylouni","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau<sup>2</sup>, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>, and Cochran's <i>Q</i> test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 as significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post-radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node-negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long-term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.

Data Sources

PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies.

Methods

Both electronic and manual search strategies were conducted within the abovementioned databases and included articles and reviews to find the relevant studies. Rates of occult nodal metastasis, survival outcomes, and postoperative complications were analyzed in N0 patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy with END. Fixed and random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates of overall survival metastasis rates with 95% confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was assessed using tau2, I2, and Cochran's Q test. Statistical analyses were performed in R software with p < 0.05 as significant.

Results

The included eight studies reported occult metastasis rates ranging from 4% to 10% in clinically N0 necks post-radiotherapy. Overall survival was approximately 52%, with mixed evidence on the survival advantage of END. Disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival rates ranged from 71.7% to 95.5% at 5 years. Complication rates associated with END were high, with up to 47.4% of patients experiencing postoperative morbidity. The metastasis rate was 10%–13% highlighting the ability of END to detect occult metastases.

Conclusion

The survival benefits of END are not consistently supported by current evidence, while the significant morbidity associated with the procedure raises concerns about its routine use. A conservative approach may be more appropriate for clinically node-negative patients, particularly when weighed against the elevated risks of complications. END demonstrates moderate overall survival rates and an ability to detect occult metastases, but its role in improving long-term outcomes remains unclear. Larger prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to better define the indications and outcomes of END in the salvage management of clinically N0 necks.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信