Preferences for Psychological Therapy or Support Within an ARMS Psychological Therapies Trial: The Importance of Targeted Intervention for Unusual Sensory Experiences
Jahnese Hamilton, Akansha Singh, Chris Gibbs, Nicola A. Barclay, Lauren Birkett, Charleen Boyle, Toby Brandon, Robert Dudley, Jochen Einbeck, Victoria Larry, Jennifer Simpson, Guy Dodgson, Charles Fernyhough
{"title":"Preferences for Psychological Therapy or Support Within an ARMS Psychological Therapies Trial: The Importance of Targeted Intervention for Unusual Sensory Experiences","authors":"Jahnese Hamilton, Akansha Singh, Chris Gibbs, Nicola A. Barclay, Lauren Birkett, Charleen Boyle, Toby Brandon, Robert Dudley, Jochen Einbeck, Victoria Larry, Jennifer Simpson, Guy Dodgson, Charles Fernyhough","doi":"10.1111/eip.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with an at risk mental state (ARMS) often experience hallucinatory-type experiences, which we refer to as unusual sensory experiences (USE). However, it is not known whether individuals want to know more about USE or discuss these in therapy. Our preferences study asked whether individuals who are referred into a treatment trial for USE in ARMS consider attention to USE important.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four service users of ARMS services within two UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts completed the study-specific, “Preferences for psychological therapy or support” questionnaire. Questions elicited preferences for target of therapeutic work and therapist approach. Analysis employs a repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc analysis of difference between preferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Treatment preferences which help understand <i>causes</i> of USE and how to <i>manage</i> USE were the group priority above talking therapy generally or a focus on low mood or anxiety. Provision of medication was the lowest priority in treatment preference though it was important to some. Overall, working with a therapist to make sense of experiences was more important than having space to talk, new ideas for coping, or working collaboratively on goals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Psychological intervention for individuals with at-risk mental state needs to include acceptable and credible psychoeducation on causes of USE and how to manage these.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eip.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Individuals with an at risk mental state (ARMS) often experience hallucinatory-type experiences, which we refer to as unusual sensory experiences (USE). However, it is not known whether individuals want to know more about USE or discuss these in therapy. Our preferences study asked whether individuals who are referred into a treatment trial for USE in ARMS consider attention to USE important.
Methods
Ninety-four service users of ARMS services within two UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts completed the study-specific, “Preferences for psychological therapy or support” questionnaire. Questions elicited preferences for target of therapeutic work and therapist approach. Analysis employs a repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc analysis of difference between preferences.
Results
Treatment preferences which help understand causes of USE and how to manage USE were the group priority above talking therapy generally or a focus on low mood or anxiety. Provision of medication was the lowest priority in treatment preference though it was important to some. Overall, working with a therapist to make sense of experiences was more important than having space to talk, new ideas for coping, or working collaboratively on goals.
Conclusions
Psychological intervention for individuals with at-risk mental state needs to include acceptable and credible psychoeducation on causes of USE and how to manage these.
期刊介绍:
Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.