Preferences for Psychological Therapy or Support Within an ARMS Psychological Therapies Trial: The Importance of Targeted Intervention for Unusual Sensory Experiences

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jahnese Hamilton, Akansha Singh, Chris Gibbs, Nicola A. Barclay, Lauren Birkett, Charleen Boyle, Toby Brandon, Robert Dudley, Jochen Einbeck, Victoria Larry, Jennifer Simpson, Guy Dodgson, Charles Fernyhough
{"title":"Preferences for Psychological Therapy or Support Within an ARMS Psychological Therapies Trial: The Importance of Targeted Intervention for Unusual Sensory Experiences","authors":"Jahnese Hamilton,&nbsp;Akansha Singh,&nbsp;Chris Gibbs,&nbsp;Nicola A. Barclay,&nbsp;Lauren Birkett,&nbsp;Charleen Boyle,&nbsp;Toby Brandon,&nbsp;Robert Dudley,&nbsp;Jochen Einbeck,&nbsp;Victoria Larry,&nbsp;Jennifer Simpson,&nbsp;Guy Dodgson,&nbsp;Charles Fernyhough","doi":"10.1111/eip.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with an at risk mental state (ARMS) often experience hallucinatory-type experiences, which we refer to as unusual sensory experiences (USE). However, it is not known whether individuals want to know more about USE or discuss these in therapy. Our preferences study asked whether individuals who are referred into a treatment trial for USE in ARMS consider attention to USE important.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four service users of ARMS services within two UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts completed the study-specific, “Preferences for psychological therapy or support” questionnaire. Questions elicited preferences for target of therapeutic work and therapist approach. Analysis employs a repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc analysis of difference between preferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Treatment preferences which help understand <i>causes</i> of USE and how to <i>manage</i> USE were the group priority above talking therapy generally or a focus on low mood or anxiety. Provision of medication was the lowest priority in treatment preference though it was important to some. Overall, working with a therapist to make sense of experiences was more important than having space to talk, new ideas for coping, or working collaboratively on goals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Psychological intervention for individuals with at-risk mental state needs to include acceptable and credible psychoeducation on causes of USE and how to manage these.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eip.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with an at risk mental state (ARMS) often experience hallucinatory-type experiences, which we refer to as unusual sensory experiences (USE). However, it is not known whether individuals want to know more about USE or discuss these in therapy. Our preferences study asked whether individuals who are referred into a treatment trial for USE in ARMS consider attention to USE important.

Methods

Ninety-four service users of ARMS services within two UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts completed the study-specific, “Preferences for psychological therapy or support” questionnaire. Questions elicited preferences for target of therapeutic work and therapist approach. Analysis employs a repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc analysis of difference between preferences.

Results

Treatment preferences which help understand causes of USE and how to manage USE were the group priority above talking therapy generally or a focus on low mood or anxiety. Provision of medication was the lowest priority in treatment preference though it was important to some. Overall, working with a therapist to make sense of experiences was more important than having space to talk, new ideas for coping, or working collaboratively on goals.

Conclusions

Psychological intervention for individuals with at-risk mental state needs to include acceptable and credible psychoeducation on causes of USE and how to manage these.

Abstract Image

在ARMS心理治疗试验中对心理治疗或支持的偏好:针对不寻常感觉体验的针对性干预的重要性
具有危险精神状态(ARMS)的个体经常经历幻觉型体验,我们称之为不寻常的感官体验(USE)。然而,尚不清楚个体是否想要更多地了解使用或在治疗中讨论这些。我们的偏好研究询问被转介到ARMS使用治疗试验的个体是否认为注意使用很重要。方法94名英国国民健康服务(NHS)心理健康信托机构的ARMS服务使用者完成了针对研究的“心理治疗或支持偏好”问卷调查。问题引出了对治疗工作目标和治疗师方法的偏好。分析采用重复测量方差分析与事后分析偏好之间的差异。结果帮助理解USE的原因和如何管理USE的治疗偏好高于一般谈话治疗或关注情绪低落或焦虑。在治疗偏好中,提供药物是最不重要的,尽管它对一些人很重要。总的来说,与治疗师一起理解经历比有空间交谈、有应对的新想法或合作实现目标更重要。结论对高危精神状态个体的心理干预需要包括可接受的、可信的用药原因及如何管理的心理教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信