Bridging the Divide: Revisiting the Discrepancy Between Policy and Practice in Environmental Management in the Context of Asia

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Natalie W. M. Wong
{"title":"Bridging the Divide: Revisiting the Discrepancy Between Policy and Practice in Environmental Management in the Context of Asia","authors":"Natalie W. M. Wong","doi":"10.1111/aspp.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Environmental policies are essential for promoting sustainability, yet their implementation often falls short due to governance complexities, institutional barriers, and socioeconomic disparities. Despite international agreements and evolving policy frameworks, the gap between policy design and execution remains a persistent challenge. Bureaucratic fragmentation, conflicting stakeholder interests, and limited technological capacity hinder effective enforcement. Additionally, political inertia and economic constraints exacerbate disparities in policy outcomes, particularly in developing nations. This study examines the structural inefficiencies that contribute to policy failures and explores potential solutions, including decentralized governance, enhanced stakeholder engagement, and technological innovations. Special attention is given to environmental governance in Asia, where diverse political and economic contexts shape policy effectiveness. By analyzing case studies and existing research, this paper highlights the critical need for adaptive, participatory, and enforceable governance models to bridge the environmental policy-practice divide and ensure sustainable development.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44747,"journal":{"name":"Asian Politics & Policy","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aspp.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental policies are essential for promoting sustainability, yet their implementation often falls short due to governance complexities, institutional barriers, and socioeconomic disparities. Despite international agreements and evolving policy frameworks, the gap between policy design and execution remains a persistent challenge. Bureaucratic fragmentation, conflicting stakeholder interests, and limited technological capacity hinder effective enforcement. Additionally, political inertia and economic constraints exacerbate disparities in policy outcomes, particularly in developing nations. This study examines the structural inefficiencies that contribute to policy failures and explores potential solutions, including decentralized governance, enhanced stakeholder engagement, and technological innovations. Special attention is given to environmental governance in Asia, where diverse political and economic contexts shape policy effectiveness. By analyzing case studies and existing research, this paper highlights the critical need for adaptive, participatory, and enforceable governance models to bridge the environmental policy-practice divide and ensure sustainable development.

弥合鸿沟:重新审视亚洲环境管理政策与实践之间的差异
环境政策对于促进可持续发展至关重要,但由于治理复杂、体制障碍和社会经济差异,这些政策的执行往往不尽如人意。尽管有国际协定和不断发展的政策框架,但政策设计与执行之间的差距仍然是一个长期存在的挑战。官僚机构各自为政、利益相关者之间的利益冲突以及有限的技术能力阻碍了政策的有效执行。此外,政治惰性和经济制约加剧了政策结果的差异,尤其是在发展中国家。本研究探讨了导致政策失效的结构性低效问题,并探索了潜在的解决方案,包括分权治理、加强利益相关者的参与和技术创新。本研究特别关注亚洲的环境治理,因为亚洲不同的政治和经济环境决定了政策的有效性。通过分析案例研究和现有研究,本文强调了对适应性、参与性和可执行治理模式的迫切需要,以弥合环境政策与实践之间的鸿沟,确保可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Politics & Policy
Asian Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信