Neurobiological effects of music-making interventions for older adults: a systematic review

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nicole Espinosa, Zoe Menczel Schrire, Andrew C. McKinnon, Hannes Almgren, Loren Mowszowski, Sharon L. Naismith
{"title":"Neurobiological effects of music-making interventions for older adults: a systematic review","authors":"Nicole Espinosa,&nbsp;Zoe Menczel Schrire,&nbsp;Andrew C. McKinnon,&nbsp;Hannes Almgren,&nbsp;Loren Mowszowski,&nbsp;Sharon L. Naismith","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03006-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Evidence on the impact of music-making interventions on brain plasticity in older adults is limited.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>To investigate whether music-making interventions in older adults induce neurobiological changes and if such changes relate to cognitive improvements.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria targeted randomised controlled trials with older adults (with and without mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), music-making interventions as exposure, and neurobiological measures as the primary outcome.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies (555 cognitively intact older adults) met inclusion criteria—five used piano training, one used choral singing. Three studies had overlapping cohorts, and four had a high risk of bias. One study employed electroencephalography (EEG) to measure frontal and parietal activity, while five used structural MRI to assess cortical, subcortical, and white matter integrity. Methodological heterogeneity limited comparability. Findings in the piano group included increased frontal theta power during an improvisation task, greater grey matter volume in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum, slower fibre density decline in the fornix and preserved grey matter volume in the right auditory cortex and hippocampus. Only one study reported a positive correlation between neurobiological changes and executive functioning improvements. No studies assessed neurobiological outcomes in MCI.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Evidence on music-making interventions and neuroplasticity in older adults remains inconclusive due to limited studies, high risk of bias, and methodological variability. While preliminary findings suggest potential neurobiological changes with music-making interventions, there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>High-quality trials are needed to clarify the neurobiological impact of music-making, particularly in MCI populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03006-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03006-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Evidence on the impact of music-making interventions on brain plasticity in older adults is limited.

Aims

To investigate whether music-making interventions in older adults induce neurobiological changes and if such changes relate to cognitive improvements.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria targeted randomised controlled trials with older adults (with and without mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), music-making interventions as exposure, and neurobiological measures as the primary outcome.

Results

Six studies (555 cognitively intact older adults) met inclusion criteria—five used piano training, one used choral singing. Three studies had overlapping cohorts, and four had a high risk of bias. One study employed electroencephalography (EEG) to measure frontal and parietal activity, while five used structural MRI to assess cortical, subcortical, and white matter integrity. Methodological heterogeneity limited comparability. Findings in the piano group included increased frontal theta power during an improvisation task, greater grey matter volume in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum, slower fibre density decline in the fornix and preserved grey matter volume in the right auditory cortex and hippocampus. Only one study reported a positive correlation between neurobiological changes and executive functioning improvements. No studies assessed neurobiological outcomes in MCI.

Discussion

Evidence on music-making interventions and neuroplasticity in older adults remains inconclusive due to limited studies, high risk of bias, and methodological variability. While preliminary findings suggest potential neurobiological changes with music-making interventions, there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions.

Conclusions

High-quality trials are needed to clarify the neurobiological impact of music-making, particularly in MCI populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信