Culture Shift Within the Department of Defense Regarding Brain Injury Detection and Treatment

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Deveney Ching, Areana Cruz, Jessica Ryan, Bridget Cotner, Risa Nakase-Richardson
{"title":"Culture Shift Within the Department of Defense Regarding Brain Injury Detection and Treatment","authors":"Deveney Ching,&nbsp;Areana Cruz,&nbsp;Jessica Ryan,&nbsp;Bridget Cotner,&nbsp;Risa Nakase-Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing policy within the Department of Defense (DOD).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Five DOD stakeholders participated in individual qualitative interviews and were recruited through presentations, emails, and snowball sampling. The interviews were conducted by 2 trained interviewers using a semistructured interview script. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory then organized into themes.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Research activities were conducted in-person at the James A. Haley VA in Tampa, Florida, and virtually through Microsoft Teams.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants were administrative stakeholders from the Department of Defense.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>No intervention was used.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Demographic survey and semistructured qualitative interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on interview findings, the DOD has developed organizational goals related to changing the culture of the military regarding service member brain injury (reducing stigma associated with reporting injury and seeking care), ensuring consistent services across regions, and providing appropriate education and training across the operational and medical specialties within the military. Facilitators to supporting change included implementing policies, leadership buy-in, leveraging partnerships with operational and research communities, stakeholders, and families, changing language to reduce stigma, education, and training. However, implementing change is not without barriers. Participants listed several barriers to implementing change including inability to monitor implementation of policies, leadership changes, lack of buy-in, translating research into practice, overlap and confusion regarding new policies and existing policies, lack of standardized care, and staffing shortages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policy implementation within the DOD has supported a cultural shift in how service member brain injury is recognized and treated. The findings suggest a continued need for strategies to ensure effective policy implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>The authors have no disclosures to report. The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Defense Health Agency, Department of Defense, or any other U.S. government agency. For more information, please contact [email protected].</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing policy within the Department of Defense (DOD).

Design

Five DOD stakeholders participated in individual qualitative interviews and were recruited through presentations, emails, and snowball sampling. The interviews were conducted by 2 trained interviewers using a semistructured interview script. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory then organized into themes.

Setting

Research activities were conducted in-person at the James A. Haley VA in Tampa, Florida, and virtually through Microsoft Teams.

Participants

Participants were administrative stakeholders from the Department of Defense.

Interventions

No intervention was used.

Main Outcome Measures

Demographic survey and semistructured qualitative interviews.

Results

Based on interview findings, the DOD has developed organizational goals related to changing the culture of the military regarding service member brain injury (reducing stigma associated with reporting injury and seeking care), ensuring consistent services across regions, and providing appropriate education and training across the operational and medical specialties within the military. Facilitators to supporting change included implementing policies, leadership buy-in, leveraging partnerships with operational and research communities, stakeholders, and families, changing language to reduce stigma, education, and training. However, implementing change is not without barriers. Participants listed several barriers to implementing change including inability to monitor implementation of policies, leadership changes, lack of buy-in, translating research into practice, overlap and confusion regarding new policies and existing policies, lack of standardized care, and staffing shortages.

Conclusions

Policy implementation within the DOD has supported a cultural shift in how service member brain injury is recognized and treated. The findings suggest a continued need for strategies to ensure effective policy implementation.

Disclosures

The authors have no disclosures to report. The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Defense Health Agency, Department of Defense, or any other U.S. government agency. For more information, please contact [email protected].
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信