{"title":"Culture Shift Within the Department of Defense Regarding Brain Injury Detection and Treatment","authors":"Deveney Ching, Areana Cruz, Jessica Ryan, Bridget Cotner, Risa Nakase-Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing policy within the Department of Defense (DOD).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Five DOD stakeholders participated in individual qualitative interviews and were recruited through presentations, emails, and snowball sampling. The interviews were conducted by 2 trained interviewers using a semistructured interview script. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory then organized into themes.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Research activities were conducted in-person at the James A. Haley VA in Tampa, Florida, and virtually through Microsoft Teams.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants were administrative stakeholders from the Department of Defense.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>No intervention was used.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Demographic survey and semistructured qualitative interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on interview findings, the DOD has developed organizational goals related to changing the culture of the military regarding service member brain injury (reducing stigma associated with reporting injury and seeking care), ensuring consistent services across regions, and providing appropriate education and training across the operational and medical specialties within the military. Facilitators to supporting change included implementing policies, leadership buy-in, leveraging partnerships with operational and research communities, stakeholders, and families, changing language to reduce stigma, education, and training. However, implementing change is not without barriers. Participants listed several barriers to implementing change including inability to monitor implementation of policies, leadership changes, lack of buy-in, translating research into practice, overlap and confusion regarding new policies and existing policies, lack of standardized care, and staffing shortages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policy implementation within the DOD has supported a cultural shift in how service member brain injury is recognized and treated. The findings suggest a continued need for strategies to ensure effective policy implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>The authors have no disclosures to report. The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Defense Health Agency, Department of Defense, or any other U.S. government agency. For more information, please contact [email protected].</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing policy within the Department of Defense (DOD).
Design
Five DOD stakeholders participated in individual qualitative interviews and were recruited through presentations, emails, and snowball sampling. The interviews were conducted by 2 trained interviewers using a semistructured interview script. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory then organized into themes.
Setting
Research activities were conducted in-person at the James A. Haley VA in Tampa, Florida, and virtually through Microsoft Teams.
Participants
Participants were administrative stakeholders from the Department of Defense.
Interventions
No intervention was used.
Main Outcome Measures
Demographic survey and semistructured qualitative interviews.
Results
Based on interview findings, the DOD has developed organizational goals related to changing the culture of the military regarding service member brain injury (reducing stigma associated with reporting injury and seeking care), ensuring consistent services across regions, and providing appropriate education and training across the operational and medical specialties within the military. Facilitators to supporting change included implementing policies, leadership buy-in, leveraging partnerships with operational and research communities, stakeholders, and families, changing language to reduce stigma, education, and training. However, implementing change is not without barriers. Participants listed several barriers to implementing change including inability to monitor implementation of policies, leadership changes, lack of buy-in, translating research into practice, overlap and confusion regarding new policies and existing policies, lack of standardized care, and staffing shortages.
Conclusions
Policy implementation within the DOD has supported a cultural shift in how service member brain injury is recognized and treated. The findings suggest a continued need for strategies to ensure effective policy implementation.
Disclosures
The authors have no disclosures to report. The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the Defense Health Agency, Department of Defense, or any other U.S. government agency. For more information, please contact [email protected].
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.