Autonomic Function Comparison Between Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Young Adults Infected with COVID-19: An Observational Study 4346

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Michael Eleruja, Bruna Spolador Silva, Leonardo D'acquisto, Kelly Pritchett, Karen Roemer, Ana Elisa Von Ah Morano, Vanessa Ribeiro Dos Santos, Fabio Santos Lira, Ana Paula Freire
{"title":"Autonomic Function Comparison Between Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Young Adults Infected with COVID-19: An Observational Study 4346","authors":"Michael Eleruja,&nbsp;Bruna Spolador Silva,&nbsp;Leonardo D'acquisto,&nbsp;Kelly Pritchett,&nbsp;Karen Roemer,&nbsp;Ana Elisa Von Ah Morano,&nbsp;Vanessa Ribeiro Dos Santos,&nbsp;Fabio Santos Lira,&nbsp;Ana Paula Freire","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare heart rate variability (HRV) indexes between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected unvaccinated (UYA) and vaccinated young adults (VYA).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Observational study evaluating differences in HRV between COVID-19 infected vaccinated and UYA.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>General community of young adults infected with COVID-19 in São Paulo state, Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-three UYA and 10 VYA with mild to moderate clinical COVID-19 were evaluated. Eligibility criteria: men and women, 20-40 years. Recruitment was through the media and diagnosis was via polymerase chain reaction test. Mean age of UYA was 29.17±6.32 and 26.22±5.23 years for VYA. HRV indexes were measured via heart monitor (Polar RS800CX) and this took place in a quiet room maintained at room temperature following at least 24 hours of complete abstinence from exercise, alcohol, and caffeine intake. Participants were fitted with a chest strap for 25 minutes and HRV was performed on 256 consecutive intervals and of these the most stable tachogram was selected. The indexes are divided into time domain, frequency domain, and nonlinear variables. The major indexes of note were mean heart rate (HR), stress index, low frequency power (LF) representing sympathetic system; mean RR interval, high frequency power representing the parasympathetic system and low frequency power/high frequency power representing global variability (overall well-being).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>HRV indexes of infected unvaccinated and vaccinated subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistically significant differences were observed only in mean HR and mean RR interval. UYA (83.5±12.6bpm) had higher mean HR compared with VYA (73.9± 4.91bpm); <em>P</em>=.004; mean difference (MD), −9.58±4.15 bpm; confidence interval, 3.34-15.81. Mean RR was higher in VYA (812.90±52.06ms) than UYA (735.43±123.78ms); <em>P</em>=.02; MD, −77.47±30.6 ms; confidence interval, −139.90 to −15.03. Although the above 2 variables indicate sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, respectively, other indexes were not statistically significant. Most indexes evaluating sympathetic and parasympathetic systems activities were not different between the groups, except for mean HR and RR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that vaccination could help to establish and maintain better autonomic function (lower mean HR and higher mean RR interval) after COVID-19, further experimental research is needed to establish a causal relationship.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Pages e12-e13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare heart rate variability (HRV) indexes between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected unvaccinated (UYA) and vaccinated young adults (VYA).

Design

Observational study evaluating differences in HRV between COVID-19 infected vaccinated and UYA.

Setting

General community of young adults infected with COVID-19 in São Paulo state, Brazil.

Participants

Twenty-three UYA and 10 VYA with mild to moderate clinical COVID-19 were evaluated. Eligibility criteria: men and women, 20-40 years. Recruitment was through the media and diagnosis was via polymerase chain reaction test. Mean age of UYA was 29.17±6.32 and 26.22±5.23 years for VYA. HRV indexes were measured via heart monitor (Polar RS800CX) and this took place in a quiet room maintained at room temperature following at least 24 hours of complete abstinence from exercise, alcohol, and caffeine intake. Participants were fitted with a chest strap for 25 minutes and HRV was performed on 256 consecutive intervals and of these the most stable tachogram was selected. The indexes are divided into time domain, frequency domain, and nonlinear variables. The major indexes of note were mean heart rate (HR), stress index, low frequency power (LF) representing sympathetic system; mean RR interval, high frequency power representing the parasympathetic system and low frequency power/high frequency power representing global variability (overall well-being).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

HRV indexes of infected unvaccinated and vaccinated subjects.

Results

Statistically significant differences were observed only in mean HR and mean RR interval. UYA (83.5±12.6bpm) had higher mean HR compared with VYA (73.9± 4.91bpm); P=.004; mean difference (MD), −9.58±4.15 bpm; confidence interval, 3.34-15.81. Mean RR was higher in VYA (812.90±52.06ms) than UYA (735.43±123.78ms); P=.02; MD, −77.47±30.6 ms; confidence interval, −139.90 to −15.03. Although the above 2 variables indicate sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, respectively, other indexes were not statistically significant. Most indexes evaluating sympathetic and parasympathetic systems activities were not different between the groups, except for mean HR and RR.

Conclusions

This study suggests that vaccination could help to establish and maintain better autonomic function (lower mean HR and higher mean RR interval) after COVID-19, further experimental research is needed to establish a causal relationship.

Disclosures

none.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信