Mobility Simulation: An IPL Opportunity 4349

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Andrea Frederick, Mindy Fabbro
{"title":"Mobility Simulation: An IPL Opportunity 4349","authors":"Andrea Frederick,&nbsp;Mindy Fabbro","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of interprofessional simulation on student perception of interprofessional collaborative competencies.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The interprofessional simulation learning activity took place. The recruitment script/consent was read. They had access to a QR code link to the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) through Microsoft Forms available on the SVSU OneDrive. Participants were asked to identify their professional program of study (Nursing or Occupational Therapy). No other demographic information was collected. The tool selected was the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Scale (ICCAS). The ICCAS was developed by MacDonald, C., Archibald, D., Trumpower, D., Casimiro, L., Cragg, B., &amp; Jelly, W. (2010). The ICCAS is a 20 item retrospective pre/post designed self-assessment. Participants complete the tool only once at the conclusion of the simulation event. All items are positively worded and the participant is asked to rate their ability before and after activity with a score from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The University of Ottawa's methodology for administering the ICCAS was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Paired <em>t</em> tests were performed on presimulation and postsimulation responses for each item of the ICCAS to evaluate perceived changes to interprofessional competencies.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>This study was conducted at a public university in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Thirty-nine nursing students and 32 occupational therapy students completed the ICCAS tool after the simulation activity.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The 3 simulations were designed using Society for Simulation in Healthcare best practices guidelines. Nursing and Occupational Therapy faulty had equal voice in planning and setting the objectives for the simulations. Objectives were reviewed with all participants. Participants were given presimulation information. Participants had time to ask questions and permission to step out of the simulation activity if they became stressed. Participants rotated to all 3 simulations, a newborn with a 100% brachial plexus injury, a 65-year-old ventilator dependent patient, and a home care patient with posttraumatic stress disorder. Participants participated in debriefing after each simulation activity.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The outcome of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interprofessional simulation to improve student interprofessional collaboration and teamwork.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using the ICCAS data, all 20 mean post simulation item scores were greater than preprogram counterparts. All students and each preprofessional group reported improved levels of interprofessional collaborative competence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results support that simulation can impact students’ perceived level of collaborative competencies. The study adds to the body of knowledge that regular exposure to IPE during prelicensure programs may help embed collaborative practice as an integral part of health professionals’ practice.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of interprofessional simulation on student perception of interprofessional collaborative competencies.

Design

The interprofessional simulation learning activity took place. The recruitment script/consent was read. They had access to a QR code link to the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) through Microsoft Forms available on the SVSU OneDrive. Participants were asked to identify their professional program of study (Nursing or Occupational Therapy). No other demographic information was collected. The tool selected was the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Scale (ICCAS). The ICCAS was developed by MacDonald, C., Archibald, D., Trumpower, D., Casimiro, L., Cragg, B., & Jelly, W. (2010). The ICCAS is a 20 item retrospective pre/post designed self-assessment. Participants complete the tool only once at the conclusion of the simulation event. All items are positively worded and the participant is asked to rate their ability before and after activity with a score from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The University of Ottawa's methodology for administering the ICCAS was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Paired t tests were performed on presimulation and postsimulation responses for each item of the ICCAS to evaluate perceived changes to interprofessional competencies.

Setting

This study was conducted at a public university in the United States.

Participants

Thirty-nine nursing students and 32 occupational therapy students completed the ICCAS tool after the simulation activity.

Interventions

The 3 simulations were designed using Society for Simulation in Healthcare best practices guidelines. Nursing and Occupational Therapy faulty had equal voice in planning and setting the objectives for the simulations. Objectives were reviewed with all participants. Participants were given presimulation information. Participants had time to ask questions and permission to step out of the simulation activity if they became stressed. Participants rotated to all 3 simulations, a newborn with a 100% brachial plexus injury, a 65-year-old ventilator dependent patient, and a home care patient with posttraumatic stress disorder. Participants participated in debriefing after each simulation activity.

Main Outcome Measures

The outcome of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interprofessional simulation to improve student interprofessional collaboration and teamwork.

Results

Using the ICCAS data, all 20 mean post simulation item scores were greater than preprogram counterparts. All students and each preprofessional group reported improved levels of interprofessional collaborative competence.

Conclusions

Results support that simulation can impact students’ perceived level of collaborative competencies. The study adds to the body of knowledge that regular exposure to IPE during prelicensure programs may help embed collaborative practice as an integral part of health professionals’ practice.

Disclosures

none.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信