Optimizing salt marsh restoration with context-dependent emergent trait mimicry and donor material selection

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Clea N. van de Ven , Ralph J.M. Temmink , Valérie C. Reijers , Jannes Heusinkveld , Pol Martinez-Garcia , Tjisse van der Heide
{"title":"Optimizing salt marsh restoration with context-dependent emergent trait mimicry and donor material selection","authors":"Clea N. van de Ven ,&nbsp;Ralph J.M. Temmink ,&nbsp;Valérie C. Reijers ,&nbsp;Jannes Heusinkveld ,&nbsp;Pol Martinez-Garcia ,&nbsp;Tjisse van der Heide","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystem restoration is increasingly promoted as a tool to halt and reverse ongoing losses of coastal ecosystems and the services they provide. Recent work highlights that, in ecosystems shaped by habitat-forming species, restoration yields can be enhanced by temporarily mimicking key emergent traits. These traits are not expressed by individuals, but emerge when organisms aggregate to locally suppress environmental stress and are often vital for species' establishment and persistence. However, it remains unclear to what extent emergent-trait mimicry is context dependent and how donor material selection affects restoration success. Here, we experimentally studied the potential context dependency of trait mimicry and the effect of using donor source populations from contrasting environments in a three-year salt marsh restoration experiment. At two sites with contrasting hydrodynamic conditions – one relatively sheltered and the other exposed – we cross-transplanted plants from both sites into bare soil and 3D-printed biodegradable structures as trait-mimics, mimicking either sparse or dense vegetation patches. After three years, transplants from the sheltered site had two-fold higher survival and four-times more shoots compared to transplants from the exposed site. Furthermore, we found that in sheltered conditions, structures increased survival compared to control treatments, and plants in dense trait mimics grew the highest number of shoots. By contrast, most transplants in exposed conditions were lost after year one regardless of origin and treatment. We conclude that the donor source is a vital determinant for transplant establishment, and that emergent trait mimicry is context dependent for salt marshes, emphasizing the need for trait-mimics tailored to local conditions to increase restoration success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem restoration is increasingly promoted as a tool to halt and reverse ongoing losses of coastal ecosystems and the services they provide. Recent work highlights that, in ecosystems shaped by habitat-forming species, restoration yields can be enhanced by temporarily mimicking key emergent traits. These traits are not expressed by individuals, but emerge when organisms aggregate to locally suppress environmental stress and are often vital for species' establishment and persistence. However, it remains unclear to what extent emergent-trait mimicry is context dependent and how donor material selection affects restoration success. Here, we experimentally studied the potential context dependency of trait mimicry and the effect of using donor source populations from contrasting environments in a three-year salt marsh restoration experiment. At two sites with contrasting hydrodynamic conditions – one relatively sheltered and the other exposed – we cross-transplanted plants from both sites into bare soil and 3D-printed biodegradable structures as trait-mimics, mimicking either sparse or dense vegetation patches. After three years, transplants from the sheltered site had two-fold higher survival and four-times more shoots compared to transplants from the exposed site. Furthermore, we found that in sheltered conditions, structures increased survival compared to control treatments, and plants in dense trait mimics grew the highest number of shoots. By contrast, most transplants in exposed conditions were lost after year one regardless of origin and treatment. We conclude that the donor source is a vital determinant for transplant establishment, and that emergent trait mimicry is context dependent for salt marshes, emphasizing the need for trait-mimics tailored to local conditions to increase restoration success.
基于环境依赖性突现性状模仿和供体材料选择的盐沼恢复优化
越来越多的人将生态系统恢复作为阻止和扭转沿海生态系统及其提供的服务的持续损失的工具。最近的工作强调,在由栖息地形成物种形成的生态系统中,可以通过暂时模仿关键的新兴特征来提高恢复产量。这些特征不是由个体表现出来的,而是当生物聚集在一起抑制局部环境压力时出现的,并且通常对物种的建立和持续存在至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚紧急性状模仿在多大程度上依赖于环境,以及供体材料选择如何影响恢复成功。在一项为期三年的盐沼恢复实验中,我们通过实验研究了性状模仿的潜在环境依赖性以及使用来自不同环境的供体源种群的效果。在两个水动力条件截然不同的地点——一个相对隐蔽,另一个暴露——我们将两个地点的植物交叉移植到裸露的土壤和3d打印的可生物降解结构中,作为特征模拟,模仿稀疏或密集的植被斑块。三年后,与暴露地点的移植物相比,庇护地点的移植物存活率高两倍,芽数多四倍。此外,我们还发现,在遮荫条件下,与对照处理相比,结构提高了植物的存活率,密集性状模拟的植物生长的芽数最多。相比之下,大多数暴露条件下的移植在一年后就丢失了,无论来源和治疗方法如何。我们得出的结论是,供体来源是移植建立的重要决定因素,并且在盐沼中出现的特征模仿依赖于环境,强调需要根据当地条件量身定制特征模仿以提高恢复成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信