Living Longer and Stronger with SCI: Using Participatory Research to Develop an Online Group Health Promotion Program for People Aging with SCI 1144

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary Hughes, Diana Gonzalez, Linda Norah-Davis, Garett Parrish, Heather Taylor
{"title":"Living Longer and Stronger with SCI: Using Participatory Research to Develop an Online Group Health Promotion Program for People Aging with SCI 1144","authors":"Susan Robinson-Whelen,&nbsp;Rosemary Hughes,&nbsp;Diana Gonzalez,&nbsp;Linda Norah-Davis,&nbsp;Garett Parrish,&nbsp;Heather Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop and beta-test an online group health promotion program for people aging with spinal cord injury (SCI) in preparation for a national randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>People with SCI participated in a beta-test of the intervention to provide feedback on acceptability and ways to improve the program.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The group program was implemented online via Zoom.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Meeting the same criteria to be used in the full trial, the 6 beta-testers were community-residing adults with SCI who were either 45+ years of age or had been living with their SCI for 15+ years. Beta-testers were diverse in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, level of injury, and geographic location.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The investigators partnered closely with community advisors with SCI and a multidisciplinary medical advisory board to develop the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. The 8-session program, cofacilitated by a person with SCI and a coinvestigator, addresses physical and psychosocial health of people aging with SCI. Community advisors and the multidisciplinary team codeveloped and reviewed each session to assure relevance, usability, and sensitivity for people with SCI. Sessions included educational content, group discussion, action planning, and relaxation exercises. The team developed intervention materials including PowerPoints, a Participant Handbook, and a detailed Facilitator Manual.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Beta-testers completed brief evaluation surveys after each session. At the end of the program, they were asked to rate, on a 5-point scale, the program overall and the extent to which each aspect of the program (content, discussion, action planning, relaxation exercises, participant handbook) was helpful. They also responded to open-ended questions asking for suggestions for improving the program overall, the program materials, and the Zoom platform. They were also invited to share additional comments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program was well received. All 6 beta-testers (100%) rated the program overall as excellent. The majority rated all aspects of the program as helpful: content (100% “very” helpful), discussion (100% “very” helpful), action planning (83% “very,” 17% “somewhat” helpful), relaxation (33% “very,” 50% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”), and participant handbook (66% “very,” 17% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”). Although open-ended responses were positive, a few beta-testers suggested more time for group interaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participatory research methods were successful in the development and review of the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. Beta-test results were positive and provided additional suggestions that will be used to improve the program prior to the randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To develop and beta-test an online group health promotion program for people aging with spinal cord injury (SCI) in preparation for a national randomized controlled trial.

Design

People with SCI participated in a beta-test of the intervention to provide feedback on acceptability and ways to improve the program.

Setting

The group program was implemented online via Zoom.

Participants

Meeting the same criteria to be used in the full trial, the 6 beta-testers were community-residing adults with SCI who were either 45+ years of age or had been living with their SCI for 15+ years. Beta-testers were diverse in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, level of injury, and geographic location.

Interventions

The investigators partnered closely with community advisors with SCI and a multidisciplinary medical advisory board to develop the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. The 8-session program, cofacilitated by a person with SCI and a coinvestigator, addresses physical and psychosocial health of people aging with SCI. Community advisors and the multidisciplinary team codeveloped and reviewed each session to assure relevance, usability, and sensitivity for people with SCI. Sessions included educational content, group discussion, action planning, and relaxation exercises. The team developed intervention materials including PowerPoints, a Participant Handbook, and a detailed Facilitator Manual.

Main Outcome Measures

Beta-testers completed brief evaluation surveys after each session. At the end of the program, they were asked to rate, on a 5-point scale, the program overall and the extent to which each aspect of the program (content, discussion, action planning, relaxation exercises, participant handbook) was helpful. They also responded to open-ended questions asking for suggestions for improving the program overall, the program materials, and the Zoom platform. They were also invited to share additional comments.

Results

The Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program was well received. All 6 beta-testers (100%) rated the program overall as excellent. The majority rated all aspects of the program as helpful: content (100% “very” helpful), discussion (100% “very” helpful), action planning (83% “very,” 17% “somewhat” helpful), relaxation (33% “very,” 50% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”), and participant handbook (66% “very,” 17% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”). Although open-ended responses were positive, a few beta-testers suggested more time for group interaction.

Conclusions

Participatory research methods were successful in the development and review of the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. Beta-test results were positive and provided additional suggestions that will be used to improve the program prior to the randomized controlled trial.

Disclosures

none.
SCI患者活得更久更强:利用参与式研究开发SCI老年人在线群体健康促进计划1144
目的为老龄脊髓损伤(SCI)患者开发和测试在线群体健康促进项目,为全国随机对照试验做准备。SCI患者参与了干预的beta测试,以提供关于可接受性和改进程序的方法的反馈。小组项目通过Zoom在线实施。参与者符合与整个试验相同的标准,6名beta测试者是居住在社区的SCI患者,他们要么45岁以上,要么患有SCI 15年以上。beta测试者在性别、种族/民族、受伤程度和地理位置等方面存在差异。干预措施研究人员与脊髓损伤的社区顾问和多学科医学顾问委员会密切合作,共同开发了“脊髓损伤患者更长寿更强壮”项目。该项目由一名脊髓损伤患者和一名共同研究者共同主持,共8次会议,讨论脊髓损伤老年人的身体和心理健康问题。社区顾问和多学科团队共同开发并审查了每次会议,以确保SCI患者的相关性、可用性和敏感性。会议包括教育内容、小组讨论、行动计划和放松练习。该团队开发了干预材料,包括幻灯片、参与者手册和详细的调解人手册。主要结果测量:beta测试者在每次测试后完成简短的评估调查。在课程结束时,他们被要求以5分制对整个课程以及课程各方面(内容、讨论、行动计划、放松练习、参与者手册)的帮助程度进行评分。他们还回答了一些开放式问题,询问他们对改进整个项目、项目材料和Zoom平台的建议。他们还被邀请分享其他意见。结果“活得更久更强与SCI”项目获得好评。所有6个beta测试者(100%)都认为该程序总体上是优秀的。大多数人认为课程的所有方面都很有帮助:内容(100%“非常”有帮助),讨论(100%“非常”有帮助),行动计划(83%“非常”,17%“有点”有帮助),放松(33%“非常”,50%“有点”,17%“未定”),以及参与者手册(66%“非常”,17%“有点”,17%“未定”)。尽管开放式的回答是积极的,但一些beta测试者建议更多的时间进行小组互动。结论参与式研究方法在SCI项目的开发和综述中是成功的。beta测试结果是积极的,并提供了额外的建议,将用于在随机对照试验之前改进该程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信