Living Longer and Stronger with SCI: Using Participatory Research to Develop an Online Group Health Promotion Program for People Aging with SCI 1144

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary Hughes, Diana Gonzalez, Linda Norah-Davis, Garett Parrish, Heather Taylor
{"title":"Living Longer and Stronger with SCI: Using Participatory Research to Develop an Online Group Health Promotion Program for People Aging with SCI 1144","authors":"Susan Robinson-Whelen,&nbsp;Rosemary Hughes,&nbsp;Diana Gonzalez,&nbsp;Linda Norah-Davis,&nbsp;Garett Parrish,&nbsp;Heather Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To develop and beta-test an online group health promotion program for people aging with spinal cord injury (SCI) in preparation for a national randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>People with SCI participated in a beta-test of the intervention to provide feedback on acceptability and ways to improve the program.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The group program was implemented online via Zoom.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Meeting the same criteria to be used in the full trial, the 6 beta-testers were community-residing adults with SCI who were either 45+ years of age or had been living with their SCI for 15+ years. Beta-testers were diverse in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, level of injury, and geographic location.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The investigators partnered closely with community advisors with SCI and a multidisciplinary medical advisory board to develop the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. The 8-session program, cofacilitated by a person with SCI and a coinvestigator, addresses physical and psychosocial health of people aging with SCI. Community advisors and the multidisciplinary team codeveloped and reviewed each session to assure relevance, usability, and sensitivity for people with SCI. Sessions included educational content, group discussion, action planning, and relaxation exercises. The team developed intervention materials including PowerPoints, a Participant Handbook, and a detailed Facilitator Manual.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Beta-testers completed brief evaluation surveys after each session. At the end of the program, they were asked to rate, on a 5-point scale, the program overall and the extent to which each aspect of the program (content, discussion, action planning, relaxation exercises, participant handbook) was helpful. They also responded to open-ended questions asking for suggestions for improving the program overall, the program materials, and the Zoom platform. They were also invited to share additional comments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program was well received. All 6 beta-testers (100%) rated the program overall as excellent. The majority rated all aspects of the program as helpful: content (100% “very” helpful), discussion (100% “very” helpful), action planning (83% “very,” 17% “somewhat” helpful), relaxation (33% “very,” 50% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”), and participant handbook (66% “very,” 17% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”). Although open-ended responses were positive, a few beta-testers suggested more time for group interaction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participatory research methods were successful in the development and review of the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. Beta-test results were positive and provided additional suggestions that will be used to improve the program prior to the randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To develop and beta-test an online group health promotion program for people aging with spinal cord injury (SCI) in preparation for a national randomized controlled trial.

Design

People with SCI participated in a beta-test of the intervention to provide feedback on acceptability and ways to improve the program.

Setting

The group program was implemented online via Zoom.

Participants

Meeting the same criteria to be used in the full trial, the 6 beta-testers were community-residing adults with SCI who were either 45+ years of age or had been living with their SCI for 15+ years. Beta-testers were diverse in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, level of injury, and geographic location.

Interventions

The investigators partnered closely with community advisors with SCI and a multidisciplinary medical advisory board to develop the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. The 8-session program, cofacilitated by a person with SCI and a coinvestigator, addresses physical and psychosocial health of people aging with SCI. Community advisors and the multidisciplinary team codeveloped and reviewed each session to assure relevance, usability, and sensitivity for people with SCI. Sessions included educational content, group discussion, action planning, and relaxation exercises. The team developed intervention materials including PowerPoints, a Participant Handbook, and a detailed Facilitator Manual.

Main Outcome Measures

Beta-testers completed brief evaluation surveys after each session. At the end of the program, they were asked to rate, on a 5-point scale, the program overall and the extent to which each aspect of the program (content, discussion, action planning, relaxation exercises, participant handbook) was helpful. They also responded to open-ended questions asking for suggestions for improving the program overall, the program materials, and the Zoom platform. They were also invited to share additional comments.

Results

The Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program was well received. All 6 beta-testers (100%) rated the program overall as excellent. The majority rated all aspects of the program as helpful: content (100% “very” helpful), discussion (100% “very” helpful), action planning (83% “very,” 17% “somewhat” helpful), relaxation (33% “very,” 50% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”), and participant handbook (66% “very,” 17% “somewhat,” 17% “undecided”). Although open-ended responses were positive, a few beta-testers suggested more time for group interaction.

Conclusions

Participatory research methods were successful in the development and review of the Living Longer and Stronger with SCI program. Beta-test results were positive and provided additional suggestions that will be used to improve the program prior to the randomized controlled trial.

Disclosures

none.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信