Mariana Mendes Bahia, Julia Carpenter, Leora Cherney
{"title":"NIDILRR ARRT: Translating Research to Clinical Practice: Implementing Surface Electromyography for Swallowing Management in a Rehabilitation Hospital","authors":"Mariana Mendes Bahia, Julia Carpenter, Leora Cherney","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) about the implementation of a surface electromyography (sEMG) device in swallowing therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Descriptive survey and qualitative study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Rehabilitation hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Forty-four SLPs (mean age, 32.9y, SD, 7.1y) answered a preimplementation survey about biofeedback use in swallowing management and barriers to sEMG use in clinical practice. Six clinicians (mean age, 35.2y, SD, 4.8y) participated in the sEMG implementation process for 5 months.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>sEMG.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Preimplementation survey addressed (i) biofeedback use in swallowing management, (ii) sEMG knowledge, and (iii) barriers to sEMG use in clinical practice. Implementation process included (i) number of patients and sessions using sEMG and (ii) SLPs perceptions of sEMG implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preimplementation survey indicated that the most used biofeedback modalities in swallowing management were an oral manometry device (97.7%), sEMG (11.4%), and fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (11.4%). All clinicians reported that sEMG improves visualization of muscle activity to train swallowing exercises, improves patient outcomes (77.3%), and motivates patients during therapy (45.5%). Main barriers to sEMG use included reduced knowledge (86.4%), lack of training (86.4%), and equipment access (68.2%). The 6 SLPs attended 4 educational/training meetings prior to implementation. They used sEMG with 30 patients (ages, 35-93y) for a total of 105 sessions. Clinicians reported being satisfied using sEMG (median, 8; interquartile range, 2.25; on a scale from 0 to 10), and their confidence level in using it during swallowing therapy was high (median, 8; interquartile range, 2.25). Although the SLPs recommended the implementation of sEMG throughout the hospital, they suggested that implementation should include onsite mentoring and supervised sessions when clinicians initially use sEMG with patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The education and training meetings improved clinicians’ knowledge, skill acquisition, and competency, facilitating sEMG use in swallowing therapy. The acceptability and adoption of sEMG was enhanced by researchers working in partnership with clinicians to identify strategies to address implementation barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To examine the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) about the implementation of a surface electromyography (sEMG) device in swallowing therapy.
Design
Descriptive survey and qualitative study.
Setting
Rehabilitation hospital.
Participants
Forty-four SLPs (mean age, 32.9y, SD, 7.1y) answered a preimplementation survey about biofeedback use in swallowing management and barriers to sEMG use in clinical practice. Six clinicians (mean age, 35.2y, SD, 4.8y) participated in the sEMG implementation process for 5 months.
Interventions
sEMG.
Main Outcome Measures
Preimplementation survey addressed (i) biofeedback use in swallowing management, (ii) sEMG knowledge, and (iii) barriers to sEMG use in clinical practice. Implementation process included (i) number of patients and sessions using sEMG and (ii) SLPs perceptions of sEMG implementation.
Results
Preimplementation survey indicated that the most used biofeedback modalities in swallowing management were an oral manometry device (97.7%), sEMG (11.4%), and fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (11.4%). All clinicians reported that sEMG improves visualization of muscle activity to train swallowing exercises, improves patient outcomes (77.3%), and motivates patients during therapy (45.5%). Main barriers to sEMG use included reduced knowledge (86.4%), lack of training (86.4%), and equipment access (68.2%). The 6 SLPs attended 4 educational/training meetings prior to implementation. They used sEMG with 30 patients (ages, 35-93y) for a total of 105 sessions. Clinicians reported being satisfied using sEMG (median, 8; interquartile range, 2.25; on a scale from 0 to 10), and their confidence level in using it during swallowing therapy was high (median, 8; interquartile range, 2.25). Although the SLPs recommended the implementation of sEMG throughout the hospital, they suggested that implementation should include onsite mentoring and supervised sessions when clinicians initially use sEMG with patients.
Conclusions
The education and training meetings improved clinicians’ knowledge, skill acquisition, and competency, facilitating sEMG use in swallowing therapy. The acceptability and adoption of sEMG was enhanced by researchers working in partnership with clinicians to identify strategies to address implementation barriers.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.