Mapping moral judgments of food waste: Moving beyond truisms

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Michal Misiak , Małgorzata Sobol , Michal Mikolaj Stefanczyk , Łukasz Sakowski , Paulina Idziak , Oliver Scott Curry
{"title":"Mapping moral judgments of food waste: Moving beyond truisms","authors":"Michal Misiak ,&nbsp;Małgorzata Sobol ,&nbsp;Michal Mikolaj Stefanczyk ,&nbsp;Łukasz Sakowski ,&nbsp;Paulina Idziak ,&nbsp;Oliver Scott Curry","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Why do people see wasting food as immoral? While previous studies on food-wasting behaviour have explored its moral significance, they often lacked a clear scientific operationalisation of morality. This project bridges the gap between research on food-wasting behaviour and moral psychology by mapping folk moral intuitions about food waste onto the theory-driven Morality-as-Cooperation (MAC) framework.</div><div>Across two studies, we identified common folk moral intuitions about why food wasting behaviour is considered immoral and compared them to MAC-based moral domains. We examined how these folk intuitions relate to MAC domains and tested how both influence food-wasting behaviours. The strongest folk predictors of food waste condemnation were concerns for nature, thriftiness, and world hunger, while the key MAC-based intuitions were Fairness (resource distribution), Deference (authority and tradition), and Group Loyalty (community commitment), with Fairness underpinning most folk intuitions. Both folk and cooperative moral intuitions predicted food wasting behaviours, such as discarding unpalatable foods, overshopping, meal planning, and food sharing. Folk intuitions also mediated the link between MAC-based moral concerns (Fairness and Reciprocity) and food-wasting behaviours.</div><div>These findings ground folk moral beliefs in a scientific framework, providing a more systematic understanding of food waste morality and offering new insights for more effective interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 113184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do people see wasting food as immoral? While previous studies on food-wasting behaviour have explored its moral significance, they often lacked a clear scientific operationalisation of morality. This project bridges the gap between research on food-wasting behaviour and moral psychology by mapping folk moral intuitions about food waste onto the theory-driven Morality-as-Cooperation (MAC) framework.
Across two studies, we identified common folk moral intuitions about why food wasting behaviour is considered immoral and compared them to MAC-based moral domains. We examined how these folk intuitions relate to MAC domains and tested how both influence food-wasting behaviours. The strongest folk predictors of food waste condemnation were concerns for nature, thriftiness, and world hunger, while the key MAC-based intuitions were Fairness (resource distribution), Deference (authority and tradition), and Group Loyalty (community commitment), with Fairness underpinning most folk intuitions. Both folk and cooperative moral intuitions predicted food wasting behaviours, such as discarding unpalatable foods, overshopping, meal planning, and food sharing. Folk intuitions also mediated the link between MAC-based moral concerns (Fairness and Reciprocity) and food-wasting behaviours.
These findings ground folk moral beliefs in a scientific framework, providing a more systematic understanding of food waste morality and offering new insights for more effective interventions.
为什么人们认为浪费食物是不道德的?虽然以往关于浪费食物行为的研究探讨了其道德意义,但这些研究往往缺乏明确的科学道德操作化。通过两项研究,我们确定了关于浪费食物行为为何被视为不道德的常见民间道德直觉,并将其与基于 MAC 的道德领域进行了比较。我们研究了这些民间直觉与 MAC 领域之间的关系,并测试了两者对浪费食物行为的影响。对食物浪费谴责的最强民间预测因素是对自然的关注、节俭和世界饥饿,而基于 MAC 的关键直觉是公平(资源分配)、尊重(权威和传统)和群体忠诚(社区承诺),其中公平是大多数民间直觉的基础。民间直觉和合作道德直觉都能预测浪费食物的行为,如丢弃难吃的食物、过度购物、计划膳食和分享食物。这些发现将民间道德信念建立在科学的框架内,使人们对浪费食物的道德观念有了更系统的了解,并为更有效的干预措施提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信