{"title":"Green signal addresses the financing dilemmas in port development","authors":"Bo Lin , Yuhao Cheng , Bo Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing global trade demands and the digital and green transformation of ports, the financing dilemma has emerged as a critical constraint on port development. To address the issue of information asymmetry between ports and investors, this paper proposes green port construction with the shore power berth installation rate as a core indicator as a signaling mechanism, constructing a dynamic Bayesian game model to analyze the strategic interactions and equilibrium conditions between ports and investors. The research demonstrates that when the shore power berth installation rate falls within a reasonable range (i.e., the cost of green construction for high-utilization ports is lower than their digitalization returns, while the cost exceeds returns for low-utilization ports), a separating equilibrium can be achieved—efficient ports signal their high quality through green construction to attract investment, while inefficient ports abstain from such initiatives. Numerical simulations, based on data from Hebei Port Group, validate the effectiveness of this mechanism and highlight that excessively high shore power installation standards can lead to a pooling equilibrium, resulting in investor refusal to finance. The numerical simulation also shows the speed at which the game tends toward equilibrium under different conditions. The stronger the profitability of the port after receiving investment, and the greater the probability that investors adopt a strategy to recognize green signals at the initial stage of the game, the faster the game tends to move towards a separating equilibrium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Pages 178-190"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With increasing global trade demands and the digital and green transformation of ports, the financing dilemma has emerged as a critical constraint on port development. To address the issue of information asymmetry between ports and investors, this paper proposes green port construction with the shore power berth installation rate as a core indicator as a signaling mechanism, constructing a dynamic Bayesian game model to analyze the strategic interactions and equilibrium conditions between ports and investors. The research demonstrates that when the shore power berth installation rate falls within a reasonable range (i.e., the cost of green construction for high-utilization ports is lower than their digitalization returns, while the cost exceeds returns for low-utilization ports), a separating equilibrium can be achieved—efficient ports signal their high quality through green construction to attract investment, while inefficient ports abstain from such initiatives. Numerical simulations, based on data from Hebei Port Group, validate the effectiveness of this mechanism and highlight that excessively high shore power installation standards can lead to a pooling equilibrium, resulting in investor refusal to finance. The numerical simulation also shows the speed at which the game tends toward equilibrium under different conditions. The stronger the profitability of the port after receiving investment, and the greater the probability that investors adopt a strategy to recognize green signals at the initial stage of the game, the faster the game tends to move towards a separating equilibrium.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.