Green signal addresses the financing dilemmas in port development

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Bo Lin , Yuhao Cheng , Bo Lu
{"title":"Green signal addresses the financing dilemmas in port development","authors":"Bo Lin ,&nbsp;Yuhao Cheng ,&nbsp;Bo Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing global trade demands and the digital and green transformation of ports, the financing dilemma has emerged as a critical constraint on port development. To address the issue of information asymmetry between ports and investors, this paper proposes green port construction with the shore power berth installation rate as a core indicator as a signaling mechanism, constructing a dynamic Bayesian game model to analyze the strategic interactions and equilibrium conditions between ports and investors. The research demonstrates that when the shore power berth installation rate falls within a reasonable range (i.e., the cost of green construction for high-utilization ports is lower than their digitalization returns, while the cost exceeds returns for low-utilization ports), a separating equilibrium can be achieved—efficient ports signal their high quality through green construction to attract investment, while inefficient ports abstain from such initiatives. Numerical simulations, based on data from Hebei Port Group, validate the effectiveness of this mechanism and highlight that excessively high shore power installation standards can lead to a pooling equilibrium, resulting in investor refusal to finance. The numerical simulation also shows the speed at which the game tends toward equilibrium under different conditions. The stronger the profitability of the port after receiving investment, and the greater the probability that investors adopt a strategy to recognize green signals at the initial stage of the game, the faster the game tends to move towards a separating equilibrium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Pages 178-190"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing global trade demands and the digital and green transformation of ports, the financing dilemma has emerged as a critical constraint on port development. To address the issue of information asymmetry between ports and investors, this paper proposes green port construction with the shore power berth installation rate as a core indicator as a signaling mechanism, constructing a dynamic Bayesian game model to analyze the strategic interactions and equilibrium conditions between ports and investors. The research demonstrates that when the shore power berth installation rate falls within a reasonable range (i.e., the cost of green construction for high-utilization ports is lower than their digitalization returns, while the cost exceeds returns for low-utilization ports), a separating equilibrium can be achieved—efficient ports signal their high quality through green construction to attract investment, while inefficient ports abstain from such initiatives. Numerical simulations, based on data from Hebei Port Group, validate the effectiveness of this mechanism and highlight that excessively high shore power installation standards can lead to a pooling equilibrium, resulting in investor refusal to finance. The numerical simulation also shows the speed at which the game tends toward equilibrium under different conditions. The stronger the profitability of the port after receiving investment, and the greater the probability that investors adopt a strategy to recognize green signals at the initial stage of the game, the faster the game tends to move towards a separating equilibrium.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信