Modeling and analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based multigeneration system with supercritical and transcritical carbon dioxide power cycles, humidification-dehumidification system and hydrogen generation

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Gamze Soyturk, Onder Kizilkan
{"title":"Modeling and analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based multigeneration system with supercritical and transcritical carbon dioxide power cycles, humidification-dehumidification system and hydrogen generation","authors":"Gamze Soyturk,&nbsp;Onder Kizilkan","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the development and performance evaluation of an innovative solid oxide fuel cell-based multigeneration system designed to enhance energy efficiency and facilitate hydrogen production. The system integrates advanced thermodynamic cycles, including a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle, a reheat transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle, a humidification and dehumidification unit, and a hydrogen production subsystem. The supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle improves energy recovery by utilizing waste heat, while the reheat transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle enhances thermal efficiency. Additionally, the humidification and dehumidification unit provide a novel approach to sustainable water production. Energy and exergy analyses indicate that the solid oxide fuel cell generates a net power output of 420.8 kW with an exergy efficiency of 53.88 %. Waste heat recovery from the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle and reheat transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle contributes 32.74 kW and 7.636 kW, respectively. The humidification and dehumidification unit achieves a distilled water production rate of 23.62 kg/h, while the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer produces hydrogen at 0.7935 kg/h with an energetic efficiency of 61.96 %. Parametric studies assess the influence of solid oxide fuel cell inlet temperature, current density, and fuel utilization factor on system performance, revealing that efficiency and hydrogen production peak under moderate operating conditions. However, extreme conditions lead to increased irreversibilities and performance degradation. Exergy destruction analysis identifies the solid oxide fuel cell as the dominant source of system inefficiencies, contributing 531.8 kW (83.4 % of total irreversibilities), emphasizing the need for targeted design optimizations. The findings highlight the potential of the proposed multigeneration system to efficiently integrate power, hydrogen, and water production while optimizing energy utilization and sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119762"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the development and performance evaluation of an innovative solid oxide fuel cell-based multigeneration system designed to enhance energy efficiency and facilitate hydrogen production. The system integrates advanced thermodynamic cycles, including a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle, a reheat transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle, a humidification and dehumidification unit, and a hydrogen production subsystem. The supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle improves energy recovery by utilizing waste heat, while the reheat transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle enhances thermal efficiency. Additionally, the humidification and dehumidification unit provide a novel approach to sustainable water production. Energy and exergy analyses indicate that the solid oxide fuel cell generates a net power output of 420.8 kW with an exergy efficiency of 53.88 %. Waste heat recovery from the supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle and reheat transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle contributes 32.74 kW and 7.636 kW, respectively. The humidification and dehumidification unit achieves a distilled water production rate of 23.62 kg/h, while the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer produces hydrogen at 0.7935 kg/h with an energetic efficiency of 61.96 %. Parametric studies assess the influence of solid oxide fuel cell inlet temperature, current density, and fuel utilization factor on system performance, revealing that efficiency and hydrogen production peak under moderate operating conditions. However, extreme conditions lead to increased irreversibilities and performance degradation. Exergy destruction analysis identifies the solid oxide fuel cell as the dominant source of system inefficiencies, contributing 531.8 kW (83.4 % of total irreversibilities), emphasizing the need for targeted design optimizations. The findings highlight the potential of the proposed multigeneration system to efficiently integrate power, hydrogen, and water production while optimizing energy utilization and sustainability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信