Dylan B. Jackson , Rebecca L. Fix , Alexander Testa , Lindsey Webb , Tamar Mendelson
{"title":"When youth record police: Investigating officer intrusion and mental health repercussions among Black youth in Baltimore City, Maryland","authors":"Dylan B. Jackson , Rebecca L. Fix , Alexander Testa , Lindsey Webb , Tamar Mendelson","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><div>Recording the police is a high-stakes racial justice issue for minoritized youth and communities. No studies to date have explored youths’ efforts to record police and the mental health impacts of these experiences for youth.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined the features and mental health repercussions of in-person stops where youth attempted to record police.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data come from the Survey of Police-Adolescent Contact Experiences (SPACE), a cross-sectional survey of a community sample of Black youth ages 12–21 in Baltimore City, Maryland (<em>n</em> = 345), administered from August 2022 to July 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Youth commonly attempted to record police during direct stops (33.63%) and in-person witnessed stops (39.18%). Across both types of stops, youths’ attempts to record police were strongly associated with all forms of officer intrusion. Recording the police was also associated with significantly elevated police-initiated post-traumatic stress symptoms (PI-PTSS), even when adjusting for officer intrusion and other covariates. Recording the police was most relevant to PI-PTSS for stops with little to no officer intrusion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In addition to systemic change that eliminates inequities in police violence against minoritized youth and communities, trauma-informed supports may be needed for youth who attempt to record police stops – even when stops feature little to no officer intrusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"373 ","pages":"Article 118001"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale
Recording the police is a high-stakes racial justice issue for minoritized youth and communities. No studies to date have explored youths’ efforts to record police and the mental health impacts of these experiences for youth.
Objective
This study examined the features and mental health repercussions of in-person stops where youth attempted to record police.
Methods
Data come from the Survey of Police-Adolescent Contact Experiences (SPACE), a cross-sectional survey of a community sample of Black youth ages 12–21 in Baltimore City, Maryland (n = 345), administered from August 2022 to July 2023.
Results
Youth commonly attempted to record police during direct stops (33.63%) and in-person witnessed stops (39.18%). Across both types of stops, youths’ attempts to record police were strongly associated with all forms of officer intrusion. Recording the police was also associated with significantly elevated police-initiated post-traumatic stress symptoms (PI-PTSS), even when adjusting for officer intrusion and other covariates. Recording the police was most relevant to PI-PTSS for stops with little to no officer intrusion.
Conclusion
In addition to systemic change that eliminates inequities in police violence against minoritized youth and communities, trauma-informed supports may be needed for youth who attempt to record police stops – even when stops feature little to no officer intrusion.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.