Water depth inversion based on ICESat-2 and Sentinel-2—A case study of Qiagui Co and Ayakekumu Lake on the Tibetan Plateau

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Baojin Qiao , Tianjiao Du , Jianting Ju , Liping Zhu
{"title":"Water depth inversion based on ICESat-2 and Sentinel-2—A case study of Qiagui Co and Ayakekumu Lake on the Tibetan Plateau","authors":"Baojin Qiao ,&nbsp;Tianjiao Du ,&nbsp;Jianting Ju ,&nbsp;Liping Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>Two lakes on the Tibetan Plateau.</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>This study utilizes ICESat-2 data to extract water depth, integrates Sentinel-2 and various machine learning models to invert water depth, and evaluates the accuracy of these models, ensuring robust validation of the results. An improved OPTICS denoising algorithm was applied to extract lake water depths from the ICESat-2 data. The water depths from ICESat-2 and the reflectance data from Sentinel-2 were used to construct the water depth inversion with eight machine learning models, including Quadratic Polynomial, SVR, XGBoost, LightGBM, RF, MLP, Transformer and KAN.</div></div><div><h3>New hydrological insights</h3><div>The extracted maximum depth of Qiagui Co and Ayakekumu Lake was 14.14 m and 15.96 m, respectively, and the accuracy was high with low RMSE (0.356–0.369 m) by comparing with <em>in-situ</em> bathymetric data. Among the machine learning models, the KAN model exhibited the best inversion accuracy (RMSE: 0.789–0.952 m), followed by the MLP and Transformer models, and the SVR model was the poorest (RMSE: 0.893–1.253 m). Comparison of the water storage changes from the KAN model and SRTM in different periods since 2000, suggested that the accuracy of the KAN model was high with an average error of 12.8% in ∼7 m water depth. This study provides new insights into the lake depth extraction, water storage and change estimation based on the ICESat-2 and Sentinel-2 imagery data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500179X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study region

Two lakes on the Tibetan Plateau.

Study focus

This study utilizes ICESat-2 data to extract water depth, integrates Sentinel-2 and various machine learning models to invert water depth, and evaluates the accuracy of these models, ensuring robust validation of the results. An improved OPTICS denoising algorithm was applied to extract lake water depths from the ICESat-2 data. The water depths from ICESat-2 and the reflectance data from Sentinel-2 were used to construct the water depth inversion with eight machine learning models, including Quadratic Polynomial, SVR, XGBoost, LightGBM, RF, MLP, Transformer and KAN.

New hydrological insights

The extracted maximum depth of Qiagui Co and Ayakekumu Lake was 14.14 m and 15.96 m, respectively, and the accuracy was high with low RMSE (0.356–0.369 m) by comparing with in-situ bathymetric data. Among the machine learning models, the KAN model exhibited the best inversion accuracy (RMSE: 0.789–0.952 m), followed by the MLP and Transformer models, and the SVR model was the poorest (RMSE: 0.893–1.253 m). Comparison of the water storage changes from the KAN model and SRTM in different periods since 2000, suggested that the accuracy of the KAN model was high with an average error of 12.8% in ∼7 m water depth. This study provides new insights into the lake depth extraction, water storage and change estimation based on the ICESat-2 and Sentinel-2 imagery data.
基于ICESat-2和sentinel -2的水深反演——以青藏高原恰桂公司和阿雅克库木湖为例
研究区域:青藏高原上的两个湖泊。本研究利用ICESat-2数据提取水深,结合Sentinel-2和各种机器学习模型反演水深,并评估这些模型的准确性,确保结果的鲁棒性验证。采用改进的OPTICS去噪算法从ICESat-2数据中提取湖泊水深。利用ICESat-2水深数据和Sentinel-2反射率数据,构建了二次多项式、SVR、XGBoost、LightGBM、RF、MLP、Transformer和KAN等8种机器学习模型的水深反演。与原位水深数据相比,Qiagui Co和Ayakekumu湖提取的最大深度分别为14.14 m和15.96 m,精度较高,RMSE较低(0.356 ~ 0.369 m)。在机器学习模型中,KAN模型的反演精度最高(RMSE: 0.789 ~ 0.952 m),其次是MLP模型和Transformer模型,SVR模型的反演精度最低(RMSE: 0.893 ~ 1.253 m)。对比2000年以来KAN模型与SRTM不同时期的水量变化,KAN模型在~ 7 m水深范围内的平均误差为12.8%,精度较高。该研究为基于ICESat-2和Sentinel-2卫星影像数据的湖泊深度提取、水量储存和变化估算提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
284
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信