Old habits die hard: Early and Middle Copper Age pottery technical traditions in the Budapest Region, Hungary

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Eszter Solnay , Márton Szilágyi , Zsuzsanna M. Virág , Gábor Szilas , Dávid Kraus , Zsuzsanna Siklósi
{"title":"Old habits die hard: Early and Middle Copper Age pottery technical traditions in the Budapest Region, Hungary","authors":"Eszter Solnay ,&nbsp;Márton Szilágyi ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna M. Virág ,&nbsp;Gábor Szilas ,&nbsp;Dávid Kraus ,&nbsp;Zsuzsanna Siklósi","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The location of today’s Budapest was an important interaction zone of the Carpathian Basin in the Early and Middle Copper Age (4500–3650 cal BCE). We investigate the technological knowledge of pottery-making, transmitted through interpersonal relationships, to detect whether making stylistically different pottery sets had common technological and therefore social origins or whether we can speak of newly emerging knowledge and techniques. Pottery assemblages of seven settlements were studied resulting in the observation of numerous forming methods, additional preforming techniques, and surface treatment techniques. A mutual technical tradition has been identified in the region in which most of the pottery forms had their own way of forming. This was possibly shared by most of the potters, despite the changes in pottery forms and decoration over time. Besides, different levels of technological diversity were observed on a few sites by using common techniques on different pottery forms or uncommon ways of pottery making. Thus, our results imply that various learning networks could have existed in the region. In some settlements, the dominance of the mutual technical knowledge implies that the potters were in close social connection contrary to others with possibly higher mobility and more intensive contact with other communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 105103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2500135X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The location of today’s Budapest was an important interaction zone of the Carpathian Basin in the Early and Middle Copper Age (4500–3650 cal BCE). We investigate the technological knowledge of pottery-making, transmitted through interpersonal relationships, to detect whether making stylistically different pottery sets had common technological and therefore social origins or whether we can speak of newly emerging knowledge and techniques. Pottery assemblages of seven settlements were studied resulting in the observation of numerous forming methods, additional preforming techniques, and surface treatment techniques. A mutual technical tradition has been identified in the region in which most of the pottery forms had their own way of forming. This was possibly shared by most of the potters, despite the changes in pottery forms and decoration over time. Besides, different levels of technological diversity were observed on a few sites by using common techniques on different pottery forms or uncommon ways of pottery making. Thus, our results imply that various learning networks could have existed in the region. In some settlements, the dominance of the mutual technical knowledge implies that the potters were in close social connection contrary to others with possibly higher mobility and more intensive contact with other communities.
旧习惯难改:早期和中期铜器时代的陶器技术传统在布达佩斯地区,匈牙利
今天布达佩斯的位置是铜时代早期和中期(公元前4500-3650 cal)喀尔巴阡盆地的一个重要相互作用带。我们调查了通过人际关系传播的制陶技术知识,以检测制作风格不同的陶器是否具有共同的技术和社会起源,或者我们是否可以说是新兴的知识和技术。对七个定居点的陶器组合进行了研究,观察了许多成型方法,额外的预成型技术和表面处理技术。一种共同的技术传统已经在该地区被确定,在该地区,大多数陶器形式都有自己的形成方式。尽管随着时间的推移,陶器的形状和装饰发生了变化,但大多数陶工可能都是这样。此外,在一些遗址中,通过使用不同陶器形式的通用技术或不常见的陶器制作方法,可以观察到不同程度的技术多样性。因此,我们的研究结果表明,该地区可能存在各种学习网络。在一些聚落中,相互技术知识的主导地位意味着陶工与其他人有着密切的社会联系,可能具有更高的流动性和与其他社区更密切的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信