Eszter Solnay , Márton Szilágyi , Zsuzsanna M. Virág , Gábor Szilas , Dávid Kraus , Zsuzsanna Siklósi
{"title":"Old habits die hard: Early and Middle Copper Age pottery technical traditions in the Budapest Region, Hungary","authors":"Eszter Solnay , Márton Szilágyi , Zsuzsanna M. Virág , Gábor Szilas , Dávid Kraus , Zsuzsanna Siklósi","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The location of today’s Budapest was an important interaction zone of the Carpathian Basin in the Early and Middle Copper Age (4500–3650 cal BCE). We investigate the technological knowledge of pottery-making, transmitted through interpersonal relationships, to detect whether making stylistically different pottery sets had common technological and therefore social origins or whether we can speak of newly emerging knowledge and techniques. Pottery assemblages of seven settlements were studied resulting in the observation of numerous forming methods, additional preforming techniques, and surface treatment techniques. A mutual technical tradition has been identified in the region in which most of the pottery forms had their own way of forming. This was possibly shared by most of the potters, despite the changes in pottery forms and decoration over time. Besides, different levels of technological diversity were observed on a few sites by using common techniques on different pottery forms or uncommon ways of pottery making. Thus, our results imply that various learning networks could have existed in the region. In some settlements, the dominance of the mutual technical knowledge implies that the potters were in close social connection contrary to others with possibly higher mobility and more intensive contact with other communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 105103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2500135X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The location of today’s Budapest was an important interaction zone of the Carpathian Basin in the Early and Middle Copper Age (4500–3650 cal BCE). We investigate the technological knowledge of pottery-making, transmitted through interpersonal relationships, to detect whether making stylistically different pottery sets had common technological and therefore social origins or whether we can speak of newly emerging knowledge and techniques. Pottery assemblages of seven settlements were studied resulting in the observation of numerous forming methods, additional preforming techniques, and surface treatment techniques. A mutual technical tradition has been identified in the region in which most of the pottery forms had their own way of forming. This was possibly shared by most of the potters, despite the changes in pottery forms and decoration over time. Besides, different levels of technological diversity were observed on a few sites by using common techniques on different pottery forms or uncommon ways of pottery making. Thus, our results imply that various learning networks could have existed in the region. In some settlements, the dominance of the mutual technical knowledge implies that the potters were in close social connection contrary to others with possibly higher mobility and more intensive contact with other communities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.