Javier Gavira , Edouard Auclin , Macarena Rey-Cardenas , Pritha Roy , Jose C. Tapia , Paula Nay , Armelle Vinceneux , Felix Lefort , Simon Nannini , Adela Maria del Carmen Randis , Natacha Naoun , Bernard Escudier , Delphine Borchiellini , Guillermo de Velasco , Philippe Barthelemy , Marine Gross-Goupil , Sylvie Negrier , Stéphane Oudard , Ricky D. Frazer , Laurence Albiges , Ronan Flippot
{"title":"Activity of lenvatinib-based therapy in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A European multicenter study (LENVA-LAT)","authors":"Javier Gavira , Edouard Auclin , Macarena Rey-Cardenas , Pritha Roy , Jose C. Tapia , Paula Nay , Armelle Vinceneux , Felix Lefort , Simon Nannini , Adela Maria del Carmen Randis , Natacha Naoun , Bernard Escudier , Delphine Borchiellini , Guillermo de Velasco , Philippe Barthelemy , Marine Gross-Goupil , Sylvie Negrier , Stéphane Oudard , Ricky D. Frazer , Laurence Albiges , Ronan Flippot","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Lenvatinib’s activity after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combination therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. We aimed to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) treated with lenvatinib after failure of the prior standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multicenter retrospective study including patients with mRCC treated with lenvatinib-based therapies beyond first-line therapy between 2020 and 2024. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 133 patients, with a median age of 61 years. Clear-cell was the main subtype (82.0 %). Before lenvatinib treatment, 15.8 %, 51.9 %, and 27.8 % of patients showed favorable, intermediate, and poor risk disease, respectively, according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Moreover, patients received a median of 3 previous lines of treatment, including ICIs (90.2 %) and cabozantinib (90.2 %). Lenvatinib was given alone (45.9 %) or in combination with everolimus (33.8 %), pembrolizumab (18.0 %) or investigational agents (2.3 %). The ORR and DCR were 29.1 % and 67.7 %, respectively, with no differences between regimens or lines of treatment. With a median follow-up time of 13.5 months, the median TTF and OS were 6.2 and 9.6 months. Toxicity was manageable with dose modifications required in 34.6 %. The discontinuation rate was 9.8 %, with one toxic death.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lenvatinib-based regimens were active and safe for heavily pre-treated patients with mRCC. These findings provide evidence to support its use in daily practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 115389"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objective
Lenvatinib’s activity after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combination therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. We aimed to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) treated with lenvatinib after failure of the prior standard of care.
Methods
Multicenter retrospective study including patients with mRCC treated with lenvatinib-based therapies beyond first-line therapy between 2020 and 2024. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Results
We included 133 patients, with a median age of 61 years. Clear-cell was the main subtype (82.0 %). Before lenvatinib treatment, 15.8 %, 51.9 %, and 27.8 % of patients showed favorable, intermediate, and poor risk disease, respectively, according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Moreover, patients received a median of 3 previous lines of treatment, including ICIs (90.2 %) and cabozantinib (90.2 %). Lenvatinib was given alone (45.9 %) or in combination with everolimus (33.8 %), pembrolizumab (18.0 %) or investigational agents (2.3 %). The ORR and DCR were 29.1 % and 67.7 %, respectively, with no differences between regimens or lines of treatment. With a median follow-up time of 13.5 months, the median TTF and OS were 6.2 and 9.6 months. Toxicity was manageable with dose modifications required in 34.6 %. The discontinuation rate was 9.8 %, with one toxic death.
Conclusion
Lenvatinib-based regimens were active and safe for heavily pre-treated patients with mRCC. These findings provide evidence to support its use in daily practice.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.