Tests of fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hai-Ting Li , Chun-Chi Jin , Qiu-Yun Li , Ben Young
{"title":"Tests of fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns","authors":"Hai-Ting Li ,&nbsp;Chun-Chi Jin ,&nbsp;Qiu-Yun Li ,&nbsp;Ben Young","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An experimental investigation to examine the buckling behaviour of cold-formed stainless steel built-up section columns is presented in this paper. Stainless steel sheets of high-strength austenitic grade S35657 and duplex grade S22053 (equivalent to AISI 2205) were adopted to brake-press unlipped and lipped channel components, which were employed to assemble built-up closed section members using self-plugging rivets. A total of 26 fixed-ended column tests were conducted to examine two built-up closed sectional configurations consisting of two unlipped channels or one lipped and one unlipped channels, two nominal plate thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.0 mm, three nominal member lengths of 600, 1200 and 1800 mm, as well as fastener spacing varying from 100 to 400 mm and two different stainless steel types. Based upon the experimental results obtained from this study, the effects of stainless steel type, sectional configuration, member slenderness and fastener spacing on failure modes and loading capacities of the cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section members experiencing axial compression were discussed. By evaluating against the ultimate loads obtained from the column tests, it was found that the design rules provided in the Chinese Standards and American Specification resulted in conservative strength predictions by averages of 14% and 19% on grade S35657 as well as 29% and 17% on grade S22053, respectively, for the fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 120175"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experimental investigation to examine the buckling behaviour of cold-formed stainless steel built-up section columns is presented in this paper. Stainless steel sheets of high-strength austenitic grade S35657 and duplex grade S22053 (equivalent to AISI 2205) were adopted to brake-press unlipped and lipped channel components, which were employed to assemble built-up closed section members using self-plugging rivets. A total of 26 fixed-ended column tests were conducted to examine two built-up closed sectional configurations consisting of two unlipped channels or one lipped and one unlipped channels, two nominal plate thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.0 mm, three nominal member lengths of 600, 1200 and 1800 mm, as well as fastener spacing varying from 100 to 400 mm and two different stainless steel types. Based upon the experimental results obtained from this study, the effects of stainless steel type, sectional configuration, member slenderness and fastener spacing on failure modes and loading capacities of the cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section members experiencing axial compression were discussed. By evaluating against the ultimate loads obtained from the column tests, it was found that the design rules provided in the Chinese Standards and American Specification resulted in conservative strength predictions by averages of 14% and 19% on grade S35657 as well as 29% and 17% on grade S22053, respectively, for the fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns.
固定端冷弯不锈钢组合封闭截面柱的试验
本文对冷弯不锈钢组合截面柱的屈曲行为进行了试验研究。采用高强度奥氏体S35657级和双相S22053级不锈钢片(相当于AISI 2205)制造压力机开唇式和闭唇式槽体部件,采用自堵铆钉装配组合封闭截面构件。共进行了26次固定端柱试验,以检查两种组合封闭截面结构,包括两个非唇形通道或一个唇形通道和一个非唇形通道,两个标称板厚度为1.5和2.0 mm,三个标称构件长度为600,1200和1800 mm,紧固件间距从100到400 mm不等,以及两种不同的不锈钢类型。在此基础上,讨论了不锈钢类型、截面结构、构件长细比和紧固件间距对冷弯不锈钢组合体封闭截面构件轴压破坏模式和承载能力的影响。通过对柱试验极限荷载的评估,发现中国标准和美国规范规定的设计规则对固定端冷弯不锈钢组合封闭截面柱的强度预测平均保守率分别为14%和19%,S22053为29%和17%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信