Hai-Ting Li , Chun-Chi Jin , Qiu-Yun Li , Ben Young
{"title":"Tests of fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns","authors":"Hai-Ting Li , Chun-Chi Jin , Qiu-Yun Li , Ben Young","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An experimental investigation to examine the buckling behaviour of cold-formed stainless steel built-up section columns is presented in this paper. Stainless steel sheets of high-strength austenitic grade S35657 and duplex grade S22053 (equivalent to AISI 2205) were adopted to brake-press unlipped and lipped channel components, which were employed to assemble built-up closed section members using self-plugging rivets. A total of 26 fixed-ended column tests were conducted to examine two built-up closed sectional configurations consisting of two unlipped channels or one lipped and one unlipped channels, two nominal plate thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.0 mm, three nominal member lengths of 600, 1200 and 1800 mm, as well as fastener spacing varying from 100 to 400 mm and two different stainless steel types. Based upon the experimental results obtained from this study, the effects of stainless steel type, sectional configuration, member slenderness and fastener spacing on failure modes and loading capacities of the cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section members experiencing axial compression were discussed. By evaluating against the ultimate loads obtained from the column tests, it was found that the design rules provided in the Chinese Standards and American Specification resulted in conservative strength predictions by averages of 14% and 19% on grade S35657 as well as 29% and 17% on grade S22053, respectively, for the fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 120175"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An experimental investigation to examine the buckling behaviour of cold-formed stainless steel built-up section columns is presented in this paper. Stainless steel sheets of high-strength austenitic grade S35657 and duplex grade S22053 (equivalent to AISI 2205) were adopted to brake-press unlipped and lipped channel components, which were employed to assemble built-up closed section members using self-plugging rivets. A total of 26 fixed-ended column tests were conducted to examine two built-up closed sectional configurations consisting of two unlipped channels or one lipped and one unlipped channels, two nominal plate thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.0 mm, three nominal member lengths of 600, 1200 and 1800 mm, as well as fastener spacing varying from 100 to 400 mm and two different stainless steel types. Based upon the experimental results obtained from this study, the effects of stainless steel type, sectional configuration, member slenderness and fastener spacing on failure modes and loading capacities of the cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section members experiencing axial compression were discussed. By evaluating against the ultimate loads obtained from the column tests, it was found that the design rules provided in the Chinese Standards and American Specification resulted in conservative strength predictions by averages of 14% and 19% on grade S35657 as well as 29% and 17% on grade S22053, respectively, for the fixed-ended cold-formed stainless steel built-up closed section columns.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.