How agency alliances with complementors moderate quality assurance, product originality, and success in platform ecosystems

JiYu Kim , Jaesun Yeom , Han-Gyun Woo
{"title":"How agency alliances with complementors moderate quality assurance, product originality, and success in platform ecosystems","authors":"JiYu Kim ,&nbsp;Jaesun Yeom ,&nbsp;Han-Gyun Woo","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research on platform ecosystems has mainly focused on the relationships between users, complementors, and platform owners. However, the growing presence of agencies within platform-based markets has received little attention. Complementors are affiliated with an agency or work independently when offering products on a platform-based market. This study investigates the impact of agency affiliation on complementor success and explores how this relationship is influenced by product quality assurance and originality. Using a panel dataset of 188 mobile game applications from Google Play, we employ Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimation to analyze agency alliance direct and moderating effects on complementor performance. Our findings indicate that an agency alliance is positively associated with complementor performance. However, it is better to work independently when complementors are capable of developing products that can differentiate themselves from competitors. This study contributes to the literature by shedding light on agencies' role as intermediaries within platform ecosystems and expands our understanding of platform dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954425000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research on platform ecosystems has mainly focused on the relationships between users, complementors, and platform owners. However, the growing presence of agencies within platform-based markets has received little attention. Complementors are affiliated with an agency or work independently when offering products on a platform-based market. This study investigates the impact of agency affiliation on complementor success and explores how this relationship is influenced by product quality assurance and originality. Using a panel dataset of 188 mobile game applications from Google Play, we employ Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimation to analyze agency alliance direct and moderating effects on complementor performance. Our findings indicate that an agency alliance is positively associated with complementor performance. However, it is better to work independently when complementors are capable of developing products that can differentiate themselves from competitors. This study contributes to the literature by shedding light on agencies' role as intermediaries within platform ecosystems and expands our understanding of platform dynamics.
在平台生态系统中,与互补机构的联盟如何缓和质量保证、产品原创性和成功
以往对平台生态系统的研究主要集中在用户、互补者和平台所有者之间的关系。然而,在基于平台的市场中,越来越多的代理机构却很少受到关注。在基于平台的市场上提供产品时,互补商与代理机构有关联或独立工作。本研究考察了代理隶属关系对互补成功的影响,并探讨了这种关系如何受到产品质量保证和独创性的影响。利用b谷歌Play的188个手机游戏应用的面板数据集,我们采用广义最小二乘(GLS)估计来分析代理联盟对互补性能的直接和调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,代理联盟与互补绩效呈正相关。然而,当互补者有能力开发出能够区别于竞争对手的产品时,最好是独立工作。本研究通过揭示机构在平台生态系统中作为中介的角色,扩展了我们对平台动态的理解,从而为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信