A targeted endoscopic band ligation technique for management of acute esophageal variceal bleeding

Gilberto Herrera-Quiñones , Raúl Alberto Jiménez-Castillo , Susana Isabel Scharrer , Diego García-Compean , Joel Omar Jaquez-Quintana , Carlos Alejandro Cortez-Hernández , Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza , Andres Cardenas , José Alberto González-González
{"title":"A targeted endoscopic band ligation technique for management of acute esophageal variceal bleeding","authors":"Gilberto Herrera-Quiñones ,&nbsp;Raúl Alberto Jiménez-Castillo ,&nbsp;Susana Isabel Scharrer ,&nbsp;Diego García-Compean ,&nbsp;Joel Omar Jaquez-Quintana ,&nbsp;Carlos Alejandro Cortez-Hernández ,&nbsp;Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza ,&nbsp;Andres Cardenas ,&nbsp;José Alberto González-González","doi":"10.1016/j.gastre.2025.502282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Aims</h3><div>Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) standard therapy is traditionally performed with banding from the distal esophagus upwards. However, esophageal varices (EV) with stigma of recent bleeding are not consistently banded at the first attempt. We aimed to compare conventional banding in acute variceal bleeding (AVB) vs targeted banding of EV in patients with stigma of recent bleeding (white nipple sign).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This case–control study included patients treated in our hospital from December 2016 to September 2019 with endoscopic signs of recent variceal bleeding. The targeted technique involves deploying the first band at the recent bleeding stigmata and then completing the procedure with standard variceal banding technique. The conventional group included patients treated with standard EBL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 92 patients, 54 (58.7%) in conventional technique and 38 (41.3%) in the targeted group. Active bleeding during endoscopy occurred in 11 (20.0%) of conventional and two (6.5%) of the targeted group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.021). Although procedure time was longer in the conventional group (24.3<!--> <!-->min SD 11.58) compared to the targeted group (21.52<!--> <!-->min SD 8.73) this difference was not significant. One detached band episode was documented in targeted group and none in the conventional group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.418). TIPS were not used during this study due to health system policy. There were no significant differences in mortality, rebleeding or transfusion requirements between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The targeted technique for EV with stigma of recent bleeding had a low band detachment incidence and fewer bleeding events during endoscopy, however, the limitations of the study should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100569,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition)","volume":"48 4","pages":"Article 502282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S244438242500029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims

Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) standard therapy is traditionally performed with banding from the distal esophagus upwards. However, esophageal varices (EV) with stigma of recent bleeding are not consistently banded at the first attempt. We aimed to compare conventional banding in acute variceal bleeding (AVB) vs targeted banding of EV in patients with stigma of recent bleeding (white nipple sign).

Methods

This case–control study included patients treated in our hospital from December 2016 to September 2019 with endoscopic signs of recent variceal bleeding. The targeted technique involves deploying the first band at the recent bleeding stigmata and then completing the procedure with standard variceal banding technique. The conventional group included patients treated with standard EBL.

Results

We analyzed 92 patients, 54 (58.7%) in conventional technique and 38 (41.3%) in the targeted group. Active bleeding during endoscopy occurred in 11 (20.0%) of conventional and two (6.5%) of the targeted group (p = 0.021). Although procedure time was longer in the conventional group (24.3 min SD 11.58) compared to the targeted group (21.52 min SD 8.73) this difference was not significant. One detached band episode was documented in targeted group and none in the conventional group (p = 0.418). TIPS were not used during this study due to health system policy. There were no significant differences in mortality, rebleeding or transfusion requirements between groups.

Conclusions

The targeted technique for EV with stigma of recent bleeding had a low band detachment incidence and fewer bleeding events during endoscopy, however, the limitations of the study should be considered.
内镜下带结扎术治疗急性食管静脉曲张出血
背景/目的内窥镜带状结扎术(Endoscopic band ligation,EBL)的标准疗法传统上是从食管远端向上进行带状结扎。然而,有近期出血迹象的食管静脉曲张(EV)并不总是能在第一次尝试时就进行结扎。我们旨在比较急性静脉曲张出血(AVB)中的常规包扎与近期出血征象(白乳头征)患者EV的靶向包扎。靶向技术包括在近期出血征象处展开第一条带,然后用标准静脉曲张带技术完成手术。结果我们分析了92例患者,其中54例(58.7%)采用常规技术,38例(41.3%)采用靶向技术。常规组中有 11 例(20.0%)和目标组中有 2 例(6.5%)在内镜检查过程中出现活动性出血(P = 0.021)。虽然常规组的手术时间(24.3 分钟,标本数 11.58)长于靶向组(21.52 分钟,标本数 8.73),但差异并不显著。有记录显示,靶向组出现过一次绷带脱落,而常规组则没有(P = 0.418)。由于卫生系统的政策原因,本研究未使用 TIPS。结论针对近期有出血症状的 EV 采用靶向技术治疗,术带脱落发生率低,内镜检查期间出血事件较少,但应考虑到研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信