Assessment of a textbook affordability initiative: A framework for measuring the impact on student enrollment and retention outcomes

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Katie Bishop , Omer Farooq , Andrew Swift , Craig Finlay
{"title":"Assessment of a textbook affordability initiative: A framework for measuring the impact on student enrollment and retention outcomes","authors":"Katie Bishop ,&nbsp;Omer Farooq ,&nbsp;Andrew Swift ,&nbsp;Craig Finlay","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rising costs of textbooks have prompted widespread textbook affordability initiatives in higher education. Programs that reduce student costs and offer increased access have become an integral part of campus strategic planning initiatives. In this case study, we discuss the design, implementation, and assessment of an Affordable Content grant program at a medium sized, R2, urban university. The grant was awarded with a stipulation that the system-wide program will also be assessed. The assessment of the impact and efficacy of affordable course content initiatives requires quantitative strategies often outside academic librarians' expertise. To this end, we partnered with campus stakeholders to leverage their data analysis expertise. Since randomized controlled trials are not always viable in educational research, we used the Propensity Score Matching method to ensure the groups of students were structurally similar. The results of our analysis showed a significant impact on measures of student retention. This study adds to the growing body of literature on measuring the impact of textbook affordability and offers an opportunity to further advocate campus-wide adoption of open pedagogy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 103025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising costs of textbooks have prompted widespread textbook affordability initiatives in higher education. Programs that reduce student costs and offer increased access have become an integral part of campus strategic planning initiatives. In this case study, we discuss the design, implementation, and assessment of an Affordable Content grant program at a medium sized, R2, urban university. The grant was awarded with a stipulation that the system-wide program will also be assessed. The assessment of the impact and efficacy of affordable course content initiatives requires quantitative strategies often outside academic librarians' expertise. To this end, we partnered with campus stakeholders to leverage their data analysis expertise. Since randomized controlled trials are not always viable in educational research, we used the Propensity Score Matching method to ensure the groups of students were structurally similar. The results of our analysis showed a significant impact on measures of student retention. This study adds to the growing body of literature on measuring the impact of textbook affordability and offers an opportunity to further advocate campus-wide adoption of open pedagogy.
教科书可负担性倡议的评估:衡量对学生入学和保留结果影响的框架
教科书成本的上涨促使高等教育普遍采取负担教科书的举措。降低学生成本和提供更多机会的项目已经成为校园战略规划举措的组成部分。在本案例研究中,我们讨论了在一所中等规模的R2城市大学中设计、实施和评估“负担得起的内容”资助计划。这笔拨款的发放附带了一项规定,即整个系统的项目也将被评估。评估可负担得起的课程内容的影响和有效性需要定量策略,通常超出学术图书馆员的专业知识。为此,我们与校园利益相关者合作,利用他们的数据分析专业知识。由于随机对照试验在教育研究中并不总是可行的,我们使用倾向得分匹配方法来确保学生群体在结构上相似。我们的分析结果显示了对学生留存率的显著影响。这项研究增加了越来越多的关于衡量教科书负担能力影响的文献,并提供了一个机会,进一步倡导在全校范围内采用开放教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信