Immunogenicity and safety of a monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine in previously unvaccinated, SARS-CoV-2 seropositive participants: Primary day-28 analysis of a phase 2/3 open-label study
Katia Alves, Alex Kouassi, Joyce S. Plested, Raj Kalkeri, Katherine Smith, Muneer Kaba, Joy Nelson, Mingzhu Zhu, Shane Cloney-Clark, Zhaohui Cai, Raburn M. Mallory, Fernando Noriega, on behalf of the 2019nCoV-313 Study Investigators
{"title":"Immunogenicity and safety of a monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine in previously unvaccinated, SARS-CoV-2 seropositive participants: Primary day-28 analysis of a phase 2/3 open-label study","authors":"Katia Alves, Alex Kouassi, Joyce S. Plested, Raj Kalkeri, Katherine Smith, Muneer Kaba, Joy Nelson, Mingzhu Zhu, Shane Cloney-Clark, Zhaohui Cai, Raburn M. Mallory, Fernando Noriega, on behalf of the 2019nCoV-313 Study Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most of the population has been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and, thus, is primed by natural exposure. As such, it was assessed whether a single dose of the monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine, NVX-CoV2601, elicited a comparable immune response to XBB.1.5 in seropositive unvaccinated participants to that in previously vaccinated participants, thereby allowing the former to forego a two-dose primary series.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this phase 2/3, open-label, single-arm study (2019nCoV-313/NCT05975060 [group 2]), vaccine-naive participants ≥18 years with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection received one dose of NVX-CoV2601. This analysis compared the 28-day immunogenicity and safety of NVX-CoV2601 in vaccine-naive and previously vaccinated (≥3 prior mRNA-based vaccines, from 2019nCoV-313 group 1) participants. Noninferiority of neutralizing antibody (nAb) response in vaccine-naive versus vaccinated participants was the primary objective. The day-28 geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (GMTR) and seroresponse rate (SRR; percentage of participants with a ≥4-fold rise in antibody response from baseline) were measured, and safety was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the participants enrolled from September 11 to November 15, 2023, per-protocol sets included 306/338 (90.5%) vaccine-naive and 309/332 (93.1%) vaccinated participants. At day 28, adjusted GMTs (95% CI) against XBB.1.5 in the vaccine-naive and vaccinated groups were 1491.5 (1277.5–1741.4) and 841.4 (723.9–978.0), respectively. The vaccine-naive–vaccinated nAb GMTR was 1.8 (95% CI 1.43–2.20) and SRRs were 74.3% and 64.3% for vaccine-naive and vaccinated participants, respectively (SRR difference: 10.0 [95% CI 2.6–17.4]). No new safety signals or events of special interest were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A single dose of NVX-CoV2601 in vaccine-naive participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection elicited a robust neutralizing antibody response that was noninferior to that observed in vaccinated participants. The vaccine was well-tolerated. These data support the use of NVX-CoV2601 as a single dose, regardless of prior vaccination history.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div><span><span>NCT05975060</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 127046"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25003433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Most of the population has been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and, thus, is primed by natural exposure. As such, it was assessed whether a single dose of the monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine, NVX-CoV2601, elicited a comparable immune response to XBB.1.5 in seropositive unvaccinated participants to that in previously vaccinated participants, thereby allowing the former to forego a two-dose primary series.
Methods
In this phase 2/3, open-label, single-arm study (2019nCoV-313/NCT05975060 [group 2]), vaccine-naive participants ≥18 years with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection received one dose of NVX-CoV2601. This analysis compared the 28-day immunogenicity and safety of NVX-CoV2601 in vaccine-naive and previously vaccinated (≥3 prior mRNA-based vaccines, from 2019nCoV-313 group 1) participants. Noninferiority of neutralizing antibody (nAb) response in vaccine-naive versus vaccinated participants was the primary objective. The day-28 geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (GMTR) and seroresponse rate (SRR; percentage of participants with a ≥4-fold rise in antibody response from baseline) were measured, and safety was assessed.
Results
Of the participants enrolled from September 11 to November 15, 2023, per-protocol sets included 306/338 (90.5%) vaccine-naive and 309/332 (93.1%) vaccinated participants. At day 28, adjusted GMTs (95% CI) against XBB.1.5 in the vaccine-naive and vaccinated groups were 1491.5 (1277.5–1741.4) and 841.4 (723.9–978.0), respectively. The vaccine-naive–vaccinated nAb GMTR was 1.8 (95% CI 1.43–2.20) and SRRs were 74.3% and 64.3% for vaccine-naive and vaccinated participants, respectively (SRR difference: 10.0 [95% CI 2.6–17.4]). No new safety signals or events of special interest were reported.
Conclusions
A single dose of NVX-CoV2601 in vaccine-naive participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection elicited a robust neutralizing antibody response that was noninferior to that observed in vaccinated participants. The vaccine was well-tolerated. These data support the use of NVX-CoV2601 as a single dose, regardless of prior vaccination history.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.