Does quality matter? Understanding quality of communication consulting from a client and consultant perspective

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Daniel Ziegele, Caroline Siegel, Ansgar Zerfass
{"title":"Does quality matter? Understanding quality of communication consulting from a client and consultant perspective","authors":"Daniel Ziegele,&nbsp;Caroline Siegel,&nbsp;Ansgar Zerfass","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The multiplicity of changes in the technological, societal, political, and economic environment challenge public relations leaders in many ways. They have to review current practices, update managerial processes, and think about new ways to reach out and communicate with stakeholders. This requires knowledge which is seldom available internally and leads to a rising demand for external communication consulting. Against this background, the question of consulting quality is intensively discussed within the profession but has, so far, been largely neglected by public relations research. To fill this gap, 60 qualitative interviews with elite consultants and public relations executives were conducted to answer research questions about the understanding of communication consulting (RQ1) and the quality of communication consulting (RQ2) by consultants and clients. Contrary to theory-based expectations, neither a common conceptual understanding of communication consulting nor a differentiated, multidimensional understanding of the quality of communication consulting could be identified. Instead, twelve fundamental problems can be pointed out and four underlying causes are discussed. The article offers a fundamental review of the understanding of quality in communication consulting, which is based on an interdisciplinary approach, conceptual quality characteristics, and qualitative findings from a large-scale interview study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 102563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The multiplicity of changes in the technological, societal, political, and economic environment challenge public relations leaders in many ways. They have to review current practices, update managerial processes, and think about new ways to reach out and communicate with stakeholders. This requires knowledge which is seldom available internally and leads to a rising demand for external communication consulting. Against this background, the question of consulting quality is intensively discussed within the profession but has, so far, been largely neglected by public relations research. To fill this gap, 60 qualitative interviews with elite consultants and public relations executives were conducted to answer research questions about the understanding of communication consulting (RQ1) and the quality of communication consulting (RQ2) by consultants and clients. Contrary to theory-based expectations, neither a common conceptual understanding of communication consulting nor a differentiated, multidimensional understanding of the quality of communication consulting could be identified. Instead, twelve fundamental problems can be pointed out and four underlying causes are discussed. The article offers a fundamental review of the understanding of quality in communication consulting, which is based on an interdisciplinary approach, conceptual quality characteristics, and qualitative findings from a large-scale interview study.
质量重要吗?从客户和顾问的角度理解沟通咨询的质量
技术、社会、政治和经济环境的多样性变化在许多方面挑战公共关系领导者。他们必须审查当前的实践,更新管理流程,并考虑与利益相关者接触和沟通的新方法。这需要内部很少能获得的知识,并导致对外部沟通咨询的需求不断增加。在这种背景下,咨询质量问题在这个行业内得到了广泛讨论,但到目前为止,公共关系研究在很大程度上忽视了这个问题。为了填补这一空白,我们对精英咨询师和公关主管进行了60次定性访谈,以回答咨询师和客户对沟通咨询(RQ1)和沟通咨询质量(RQ2)的理解的研究问题。与基于理论的期望相反,既没有对沟通咨询的共同概念理解,也没有对沟通咨询质量的差异化、多维理解。相反,可以指出十二个基本问题,并讨论四个潜在的原因。本文基于跨学科研究方法、概念质量特征和大规模访谈研究的定性结果,对沟通咨询中对质量的理解进行了基本回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信