Differences in perspectives between enterprise system consultants: An inquiry into technology frame of reference in health care

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
William Olivera , Aaron Baird , Lars Mathiassen
{"title":"Differences in perspectives between enterprise system consultants: An inquiry into technology frame of reference in health care","authors":"William Olivera ,&nbsp;Aaron Baird ,&nbsp;Lars Mathiassen","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although researchers have investigated how organizations work with consultants to navigate complexities and uncertainties in enterprise system (ES) implementation, we know little about how consultants view ES implementation projects. Moreover, ES consultants are typically assumed to be homogenous in their assumptions, expectations, and knowledge, with little emphasis on how their different roles impact perceptions. Against this backdrop, we adapt Technology Frame of Reference (TFR) theory to investigate how differences in perspectives between two types of consultants, vendor and independent consultants, manifest during ES implementation in the health care context. Our approach results in two contributions: 1) identification of similarities and differences in how distinct consultant types perceive ES implementations in health care, and 2) systematic application of TFR across roles within a profession rather than across stakeholders within a specific organizational context. We discuss these contributions and their implications in relation to ES consulting and TFR theory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772725000181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although researchers have investigated how organizations work with consultants to navigate complexities and uncertainties in enterprise system (ES) implementation, we know little about how consultants view ES implementation projects. Moreover, ES consultants are typically assumed to be homogenous in their assumptions, expectations, and knowledge, with little emphasis on how their different roles impact perceptions. Against this backdrop, we adapt Technology Frame of Reference (TFR) theory to investigate how differences in perspectives between two types of consultants, vendor and independent consultants, manifest during ES implementation in the health care context. Our approach results in two contributions: 1) identification of similarities and differences in how distinct consultant types perceive ES implementations in health care, and 2) systematic application of TFR across roles within a profession rather than across stakeholders within a specific organizational context. We discuss these contributions and their implications in relation to ES consulting and TFR theory.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信