Estimating Total Dissolved Solids in Groundwater Using Machine Learning Models

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sumita Gulati, Anshul Bansal, Ashok Pal
{"title":"Estimating Total Dissolved Solids in Groundwater Using Machine Learning Models","authors":"Sumita Gulati, Anshul Bansal, Ashok Pal","doi":"10.1007/s11053-025-10480-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate forecasting of water quality is pivotal for compelling pollution control and enhanced water management practices. This study predicted total dissolved solids in groundwater samples from West Bengal, India, using data sourced from the Central Pollution Control Board for the span 2020–2022. The parameters include temperature, pH, conductivity, biological oxygen demand, nitrate-N + nitrite-N, fecal coliform, total coliform, fluoride, and arsenic. Employing a diverse set of machine learning models including seven regression models, three support vector machines (SVMs), three artificial neural networks (ANNs), and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the study evaluated model performance using root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The assessment revealed that the ANN trained with Bayesian regularization emerged as the most effective, boasting the lowest errors (RMSE = 0.00147, MSE = 0.0005, MAE = 0.0112) and the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.97), ensuring superior precision. Additionally, ANN trained with Levenberg–Marquardt and ANFIS exhibit commendable performance, showcasing minimal errors and high R<sup>2</sup> values. Among the non-ANN models, boosted tree displayed a lower RMSE (0.08246) and a higher R<sup>2</sup> (0.62), while a linear SVM demonstrated balanced performance with RMSE of 0.0877 and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.57.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-025-10480-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of water quality is pivotal for compelling pollution control and enhanced water management practices. This study predicted total dissolved solids in groundwater samples from West Bengal, India, using data sourced from the Central Pollution Control Board for the span 2020–2022. The parameters include temperature, pH, conductivity, biological oxygen demand, nitrate-N + nitrite-N, fecal coliform, total coliform, fluoride, and arsenic. Employing a diverse set of machine learning models including seven regression models, three support vector machines (SVMs), three artificial neural networks (ANNs), and an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the study evaluated model performance using root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The assessment revealed that the ANN trained with Bayesian regularization emerged as the most effective, boasting the lowest errors (RMSE = 0.00147, MSE = 0.0005, MAE = 0.0112) and the highest R2 (0.97), ensuring superior precision. Additionally, ANN trained with Levenberg–Marquardt and ANFIS exhibit commendable performance, showcasing minimal errors and high R2 values. Among the non-ANN models, boosted tree displayed a lower RMSE (0.08246) and a higher R2 (0.62), while a linear SVM demonstrated balanced performance with RMSE of 0.0877 and R2 of 0.57.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信