{"title":"Is There an Alternative “Advanced Maternal Age” Threshold for Recommendation of Invasive Prenatal Testing?","authors":"Idit Maya MD , Liat Salzer Sheelo MD , Dana Brabbing-Goldstein MD , Reut Matar PhD , Sarit Kahana PhD , Ifaat Agmon-Fishman MSc , Cochava Klein MSc , Merav Gurevitch PhD , Lina Basel-Salmon MD PhD , Lena Sagi-Dain MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine the appropriate maternal age threshold for recommendation of invasive prenatal testing. We calculated the rate of clinically significant microarray findings in pregnancies with normal fetal ultrasound per each year of maternal age, to estimate the optimal cut-off. Of the 7033 prenatal microarray analyses, 108 (1.53%) clinically significant results were noted. Receiver operating characteristics analysis failed to define a specific maternal age cut-off, in the overall cohort as well following the omission of non-invasive prenatal screening-detectable common autosomal trisomies. This implies that each woman should be offered the possibility of invasive testing, preferably publicly funded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":"47 5","pages":"Article 102821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216325000611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to examine the appropriate maternal age threshold for recommendation of invasive prenatal testing. We calculated the rate of clinically significant microarray findings in pregnancies with normal fetal ultrasound per each year of maternal age, to estimate the optimal cut-off. Of the 7033 prenatal microarray analyses, 108 (1.53%) clinically significant results were noted. Receiver operating characteristics analysis failed to define a specific maternal age cut-off, in the overall cohort as well following the omission of non-invasive prenatal screening-detectable common autosomal trisomies. This implies that each woman should be offered the possibility of invasive testing, preferably publicly funded.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.