Subjective Response to Opioids Predicts Risk for Opioid Use Disorder.

Jean Gonzalez, Vinh Tran, John Meredith, Ivonne Xu, Ritviksiddha Penchala, Laura Vilar Ribo, Natasia S Courchesne-Krak, Daniel Zoleikhaeian, Matt McIntyre, Pierre Fontanillas, Katelyn Kukar Bond, Eric Otto Johnson, Alvin Jeffery, James MacKillop, Carla Marienfeld, Harriet de Wit, Abraham A Palmer, Sandra Sanchez-Roige
{"title":"Subjective Response to Opioids Predicts Risk for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Jean Gonzalez, Vinh Tran, John Meredith, Ivonne Xu, Ritviksiddha Penchala, Laura Vilar Ribo, Natasia S Courchesne-Krak, Daniel Zoleikhaeian, Matt McIntyre, Pierre Fontanillas, Katelyn Kukar Bond, Eric Otto Johnson, Alvin Jeffery, James MacKillop, Carla Marienfeld, Harriet de Wit, Abraham A Palmer, Sandra Sanchez-Roige","doi":"10.1101/2025.03.21.25324409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure to prescription opioids can lead to opioid use disorder (OUD) in some individuals, but we lack scalable tools to predict who is at risk. We collected retrospective data on the initial subjective effects of prescription opioids from 117,508 research participants, 5.3% of whom self-reported OUD. Positive subjective effects, particularly \"Like Overall\", \"Euphoric\", and \"Energized\", were the strongest predictors of OUD. For example, the odds-ratio for individuals responding \"Extremely\" for \"Like Overall\" was 36.2. The sensitivity and specificity of this single question was excellent (ROC=0.87). Negative effects and analgesic effects were much less predictive. We present a two-step decision tree that can identify a small high-risk subset with 77.4% prevalence of OUD and a much larger low-risk subset with 1.7% prevalence of OUD. Our results demonstrate that positive subjective responses are predictive of future misuse and suggest that vulnerable individuals may be identified and targeted for preventative interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.21.25324409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to prescription opioids can lead to opioid use disorder (OUD) in some individuals, but we lack scalable tools to predict who is at risk. We collected retrospective data on the initial subjective effects of prescription opioids from 117,508 research participants, 5.3% of whom self-reported OUD. Positive subjective effects, particularly "Like Overall", "Euphoric", and "Energized", were the strongest predictors of OUD. For example, the odds-ratio for individuals responding "Extremely" for "Like Overall" was 36.2. The sensitivity and specificity of this single question was excellent (ROC=0.87). Negative effects and analgesic effects were much less predictive. We present a two-step decision tree that can identify a small high-risk subset with 77.4% prevalence of OUD and a much larger low-risk subset with 1.7% prevalence of OUD. Our results demonstrate that positive subjective responses are predictive of future misuse and suggest that vulnerable individuals may be identified and targeted for preventative interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信