Use of multiplex molecular respiratory panel in COVID-19 patients with suspected co-infections: Insights and considerations in results interpretation.

A S Nawi, E N S Engku Abd Rahman, N M N Nik Zuraina, N Musa, M Z Salleh, M N F Samsudin, W C Chua, A Muhd Besari, R Hassan, Y Y Chan
{"title":"Use of multiplex molecular respiratory panel in COVID-19 patients with suspected co-infections: Insights and considerations in results interpretation.","authors":"A S Nawi, E N S Engku Abd Rahman, N M N Nik Zuraina, N Musa, M Z Salleh, M N F Samsudin, W C Chua, A Muhd Besari, R Hassan, Y Y Chan","doi":"10.47665/tb.42.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As critically ill COVID-19 patients are prone to infections by other respiratory pathogens, this study aimed to investigate the detection of respiratory co-pathogens in such patients, by employing a multiplex respiratory molecular panel. Conducted at Universiti Sains Malaysia Specialist Hospital (HPUSM) from November 1, 2021, to November 1, 2022, this retrospective cross-sectional study analysed adults admitted with confirmed COVID-19. Oropharyngeal/ nasopharyngeal swabs collected upon admission were tested using the Fast Track Diagnostic (FTD®) Respiratory Pathogens 33 multiplex kit to detect other respiratory pathogens. Within 48 hours of admission, the presence and type of organisms were determined to assess community co-infections. Among 48 critically ill COVID-19 patients (26 male; mean age, 62.2 years), clinically significant organisms were found in 32 patients (67%). Bacterial co-infections or co-colonization were detected in 91% (29/32) of these patients, with Klebsiella pneumoniae (40%) and Staphylococcus aureus (23%) were the most common, followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%), Moraxella catarrhalis (4%), and Haemophilus influenzae (2%). Fungal (6%) and viral (2%) co-infections were less frequent. The use of syndromic respiratory panel in critically ill COVID-19 patients offers the advantage of being highly sensitive, rapid, and able to detect multiple pathogens. However, detection of multiple respiratory pathogens needs to be interpreted with caution, taking into consideration patient's clinical and radiological findings, as well as quantitative molecular data.</p>","PeriodicalId":101343,"journal":{"name":"Tropical biomedicine","volume":"42 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47665/tb.42.1.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As critically ill COVID-19 patients are prone to infections by other respiratory pathogens, this study aimed to investigate the detection of respiratory co-pathogens in such patients, by employing a multiplex respiratory molecular panel. Conducted at Universiti Sains Malaysia Specialist Hospital (HPUSM) from November 1, 2021, to November 1, 2022, this retrospective cross-sectional study analysed adults admitted with confirmed COVID-19. Oropharyngeal/ nasopharyngeal swabs collected upon admission were tested using the Fast Track Diagnostic (FTD®) Respiratory Pathogens 33 multiplex kit to detect other respiratory pathogens. Within 48 hours of admission, the presence and type of organisms were determined to assess community co-infections. Among 48 critically ill COVID-19 patients (26 male; mean age, 62.2 years), clinically significant organisms were found in 32 patients (67%). Bacterial co-infections or co-colonization were detected in 91% (29/32) of these patients, with Klebsiella pneumoniae (40%) and Staphylococcus aureus (23%) were the most common, followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%), Moraxella catarrhalis (4%), and Haemophilus influenzae (2%). Fungal (6%) and viral (2%) co-infections were less frequent. The use of syndromic respiratory panel in critically ill COVID-19 patients offers the advantage of being highly sensitive, rapid, and able to detect multiple pathogens. However, detection of multiple respiratory pathogens needs to be interpreted with caution, taking into consideration patient's clinical and radiological findings, as well as quantitative molecular data.

多重分子呼吸检测在疑似合并感染的COVID-19患者中的应用:结果解释中的见解和考虑
由于COVID-19危重症患者容易被其他呼吸道病原体感染,本研究旨在通过多重呼吸道分子面板研究危重症患者呼吸道共病原体的检测情况。这项回顾性横断面研究于2021年11月1日至2022年11月1日在马来西亚理科大学专科医院(HPUSM)进行,分析了确诊COVID-19的成年人。入院时收集口咽/鼻咽拭子,使用快速通道诊断(FTD®)呼吸道病原体33多重试剂盒检测其他呼吸道病原体。入院48小时内,确定微生物的存在和类型,以评估社区共感染。48例危重患者中,男性26例;平均年龄62.2岁),32例(67%)患者发现有临床意义的微生物。这些患者中有91%(29/32)检测到细菌共感染或共定植,其中肺炎克雷伯菌(40%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(23%)最常见,其次是肺炎链球菌(11%)、卡他莫拉菌(4%)和流感嗜血杆菌(2%)。真菌(6%)和病毒(2%)合并感染的发生率较低。在COVID-19危重症患者中使用综合征呼吸小组具有高度敏感、快速和能够检测多种病原体的优势。然而,多种呼吸道病原体的检测需要谨慎解释,考虑到患者的临床和放射学表现,以及定量分子数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信