Limbic-Sensorimotor Tug of War for the Hippocampus: Dynamic Functional Connectivity as a Transdiagnostic Vulnerability Marker in Offspring of Emotion Dysregulation Patients.

Luigi F Saccaro, Farnaz Delavari, Ben Meuleman, Nader Perroud, Dimitri Van De Ville, Camille Piguet
{"title":"Limbic-Sensorimotor Tug of War for the Hippocampus: Dynamic Functional Connectivity as a Transdiagnostic Vulnerability Marker in Offspring of Emotion Dysregulation Patients.","authors":"Luigi F Saccaro, Farnaz Delavari, Ben Meuleman, Nader Perroud, Dimitri Van De Ville, Camille Piguet","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emotion dysregulation (ED) is a key transdiagnostic symptom in several psychiatric disorders such as borderline personality disorder (BPD), bipolar disorder (BD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These disorders, here defined as ED disorders (EDD), share similarities in symptoms, comorbidity, and heritability, emphasizing the importance of a transdiagnostic approach to identify markers of vulnerability to EDD in high-risk populations, such as EDD patients' offspring (EDDoff). The hippocampus, central to ED, exhibits alterations across EDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a state-of-the-art approach (micro-co-activation patterns, μCAPs) to study the transdiagnostic dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) of hippocampal subregions from resting-state functional MRI of 201 participants (74 EDD patients, 57 EDDoff, 70 controls). μCAPs provide a data-driven differentiation within the seed region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DFC between the sensorimotor network (SMN) and the hippocampal body was lower in EDD patients (p<sub>FDR</sub>=0.0002) and EDDoff (p<sub>FDR</sub>=0.01) compared to controls, with EDDoff displaying an intermediate pattern between EDD patients and controls. dFC between the limbic network (LN) and the hippocampal head was higher in EDD patients than in controls (p<sub>FDR</sub>=0.01) and in EDDoff (p<sub>FDR</sub>=0.01). A negative correlation was found between ED and SMN (p<sub>FDR</sub>=0.01), suggesting increasing ED with decreasing SMN dFC with the hippocampus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased dFC between the hippocampal head and the LN, at the expense of the SMN, may represent a marker of disease in EDD patients. Lower dFC between the SMN and the hippocampal body may represent a marker of vulnerability to EDD in EDDoff, correlating with ED. Such a transdiagnostic construct represents a clinically relevant target for early interventions aimed at reducing vulnerability to EDD in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emotion dysregulation (ED) is a key transdiagnostic symptom in several psychiatric disorders such as borderline personality disorder (BPD), bipolar disorder (BD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These disorders, here defined as ED disorders (EDD), share similarities in symptoms, comorbidity, and heritability, emphasizing the importance of a transdiagnostic approach to identify markers of vulnerability to EDD in high-risk populations, such as EDD patients' offspring (EDDoff). The hippocampus, central to ED, exhibits alterations across EDD.

Methods: We employed a state-of-the-art approach (micro-co-activation patterns, μCAPs) to study the transdiagnostic dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) of hippocampal subregions from resting-state functional MRI of 201 participants (74 EDD patients, 57 EDDoff, 70 controls). μCAPs provide a data-driven differentiation within the seed region.

Results: DFC between the sensorimotor network (SMN) and the hippocampal body was lower in EDD patients (pFDR=0.0002) and EDDoff (pFDR=0.01) compared to controls, with EDDoff displaying an intermediate pattern between EDD patients and controls. dFC between the limbic network (LN) and the hippocampal head was higher in EDD patients than in controls (pFDR=0.01) and in EDDoff (pFDR=0.01). A negative correlation was found between ED and SMN (pFDR=0.01), suggesting increasing ED with decreasing SMN dFC with the hippocampus.

Conclusions: Increased dFC between the hippocampal head and the LN, at the expense of the SMN, may represent a marker of disease in EDD patients. Lower dFC between the SMN and the hippocampal body may represent a marker of vulnerability to EDD in EDDoff, correlating with ED. Such a transdiagnostic construct represents a clinically relevant target for early interventions aimed at reducing vulnerability to EDD in high-risk populations.

海马体边缘-感觉运动拔河:动态功能连通性作为情绪失调患者后代的跨诊断易感性标志。
背景:情绪失调(ED)是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)、双相情感障碍(BD)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)等精神疾病的一个关键的跨诊断症状。这些疾病,在这里被定义为ED障碍(EDD),在症状、合并症和遗传性上有相似之处,强调了跨诊断方法在高风险人群中识别EDD易感性标志物的重要性,例如EDD患者的后代(EDDoff)。海马是ED的中心,在整个ED中表现出改变。方法:采用微共激活模式(micro-co-activation patterns, μCAPs)对201例受试者(EDD患者74例,EDDoff患者57例,对照组70例)的静动状态功能MRI进行海马亚区跨诊断动态功能连接(dFC)研究。μ cap在种子区域内提供数据驱动的分化。结果:EDD患者(pFDR=0.0002)和EDDoff (pFDR=0.01)的感觉运动网络(SMN)与海马体之间的DFC较对照组低,EDDoff呈现介于EDD患者和对照组之间的中间模式。EDD患者边缘网络(LN)与海马头部之间的dFC高于对照组(pFDR=0.01)和EDDoff组(pFDR=0.01)。ED与SMN呈负相关(pFDR=0.01),提示海马ED升高,SMN dFC降低。结论:海马头部和LN之间的dFC增加,以牺牲SMN为代价,可能是EDD患者疾病的一个标志。SMN和海马体之间较低的dFC可能代表EDDoff中EDD易感性的标志,与ED相关。这种跨诊断结构代表了旨在降低高危人群EDD易感性的早期干预的临床相关目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信