Voices unveiled: a mixed-methods exploration of family planning education, access, and Sociocultural determinants for enhancing contraceptive decision-making in western Gujarat, India.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Vaibhav Shrivastav, Yogesh M, Dipesh Parmar, Rohankumar Gandhi, Sakshi Atulbhai Sojitra, Kundal Tanmay Subhash, Shah Pranjal Prasannakumar, Lathiya Moxa Ashokbhai
{"title":"Voices unveiled: a mixed-methods exploration of family planning education, access, and Sociocultural determinants for enhancing contraceptive decision-making in western Gujarat, India.","authors":"Vaibhav Shrivastav, Yogesh M, Dipesh Parmar, Rohankumar Gandhi, Sakshi Atulbhai Sojitra, Kundal Tanmay Subhash, Shah Pranjal Prasannakumar, Lathiya Moxa Ashokbhai","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00362-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contraceptive use plays a crucial role in achieving desired fertility levels and improving maternal and child health outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and determinants of contraceptive use among married women in Western Gujarat, India, using a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based mixed-method study was conducted. A multistage stratified cluster sampling technique was used to recruit 840 married women aged 18-49 years for the quantitative component. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with contraceptive use. Additionally, 20 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions were conducted to explore qualitative aspects of contraceptive use, using a purposive sampling technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The contraceptive prevalence rate was 60.4%, with 46.7% using modern methods and 13.7% using traditional methods. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher education levels of women (graduation: aOR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.4-12.0) and their husbands (graduation: aOR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-6.9), women's employment status (not working: aOR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-1.0), having 1-2 children (aOR = 3.6, 95% CI: 2.2-6.0), and joint decision-making was positively associated with contraceptive use. Age above 40 years (aOR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) and contraceptive decisions made by other family members (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.8) were negatively associated with contraceptive use. Qualitative findings highlighted sociocultural barriers, such as community norms, religious beliefs, and gender power dynamics, as significant influences on contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing contraceptive use in Western Gujarat. The findings underscore the need for multifaceted interventions that address individual, interpersonal, and sociocultural factors to improve contraceptive uptake and reproductive health outcomes. Interventions should focus on enhancing family planning education, improving access to services, promoting women's empowerment, and addressing sociocultural barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00362-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive use plays a crucial role in achieving desired fertility levels and improving maternal and child health outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and determinants of contraceptive use among married women in Western Gujarat, India, using a mixed methods approach.

Methods: A community-based mixed-method study was conducted. A multistage stratified cluster sampling technique was used to recruit 840 married women aged 18-49 years for the quantitative component. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with contraceptive use. Additionally, 20 in-depth interviews and 4 focus group discussions were conducted to explore qualitative aspects of contraceptive use, using a purposive sampling technique.

Results: The contraceptive prevalence rate was 60.4%, with 46.7% using modern methods and 13.7% using traditional methods. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher education levels of women (graduation: aOR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.4-12.0) and their husbands (graduation: aOR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-6.9), women's employment status (not working: aOR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-1.0), having 1-2 children (aOR = 3.6, 95% CI: 2.2-6.0), and joint decision-making was positively associated with contraceptive use. Age above 40 years (aOR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) and contraceptive decisions made by other family members (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.8) were negatively associated with contraceptive use. Qualitative findings highlighted sociocultural barriers, such as community norms, religious beliefs, and gender power dynamics, as significant influences on contraceptive use.

Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing contraceptive use in Western Gujarat. The findings underscore the need for multifaceted interventions that address individual, interpersonal, and sociocultural factors to improve contraceptive uptake and reproductive health outcomes. Interventions should focus on enhancing family planning education, improving access to services, promoting women's empowerment, and addressing sociocultural barriers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信