Approaches to identify scenarios for data science implementations within healthcare settings: recommendations based on experiences at multiple academic institutions.
Lillian Sung, Michael Brudno, Michael C W Caesar, Amol A Verma, Brad Buchsbaum, Ravi Retnakaran, Vasily Giannakeas, Azadeh Kushki, Gary D Bader, Helen Lasthiotakis, Muhammad Mamdani, Lisa Strug
{"title":"Approaches to identify scenarios for data science implementations within healthcare settings: recommendations based on experiences at multiple academic institutions.","authors":"Lillian Sung, Michael Brudno, Michael C W Caesar, Amol A Verma, Brad Buchsbaum, Ravi Retnakaran, Vasily Giannakeas, Azadeh Kushki, Gary D Bader, Helen Lasthiotakis, Muhammad Mamdani, Lisa Strug","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1511943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe successful and unsuccessful approaches to identify scenarios for data science implementations within healthcare settings and to provide recommendations for future scenario identification procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Representatives from seven Toronto academic healthcare institutions participated in a one-day workshop. Each institution was asked to provide an introduction to their clinical data science program and to provide an example of a successful and unsuccessful approach to scenario identification at their institution. Using content analysis, common observations were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations were coalesced to idea generation and value proposition, prioritization, approval and champions. Successful experiences included promoting a portfolio of ideas, articulating value proposition, ensuring alignment with organization priorities, ensuring approvers can adjudicate feasibility and identifying champions willing to take ownership over the projects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on academic healthcare data science program experiences, we provided recommendations for approaches to identify scenarios for data science implementations within healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1511943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1511943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To describe successful and unsuccessful approaches to identify scenarios for data science implementations within healthcare settings and to provide recommendations for future scenario identification procedures.
Materials and methods: Representatives from seven Toronto academic healthcare institutions participated in a one-day workshop. Each institution was asked to provide an introduction to their clinical data science program and to provide an example of a successful and unsuccessful approach to scenario identification at their institution. Using content analysis, common observations were summarized.
Results: Observations were coalesced to idea generation and value proposition, prioritization, approval and champions. Successful experiences included promoting a portfolio of ideas, articulating value proposition, ensuring alignment with organization priorities, ensuring approvers can adjudicate feasibility and identifying champions willing to take ownership over the projects.
Conclusion: Based on academic healthcare data science program experiences, we provided recommendations for approaches to identify scenarios for data science implementations within healthcare settings.