Bayesian Workflow for Generative Modeling in Computational Psychiatry.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/cpsy.116
Alexander J Hess, Sandra Iglesias, Laura Köchli, Stephanie Marino, Matthias Müller-Schrader, Lionel Rigoux, Christoph Mathys, Olivia K Harrison, Jakob Heinzle, Stefan Frässle, Klaas Enno Stephan
{"title":"Bayesian Workflow for Generative Modeling in Computational Psychiatry.","authors":"Alexander J Hess, Sandra Iglesias, Laura Köchli, Stephanie Marino, Matthias Müller-Schrader, Lionel Rigoux, Christoph Mathys, Olivia K Harrison, Jakob Heinzle, Stefan Frässle, Klaas Enno Stephan","doi":"10.5334/cpsy.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational (generative) modelling of behaviour has considerable potential for clinical applications. In order to unlock the potential of generative models, reliable statistical inference is crucial. For this, Bayesian workflow has been suggested which, however, has rarely been applied in Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry (TN/CP) so far. Here, we present a worked example of Bayesian workflow in the context of a typical application scenario for TN/CP. This application example uses Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF) models, a family of computational models for hierarchical Bayesian belief updating. When equipped with a suitable response model, HGF models can be fit to behavioural data from cognitive tasks; these data frequently consist of binary responses and are typically univariate. This poses challenges for statistical inference due to the limited information contained in such data. We present a novel set of response models that allow for simultaneous inference from multivariate (here: two) behavioural data types. Using both simulations and empirical data from a speed-incentivised associative reward learning (SPIRL) task, we show that models harnessing information from two different data streams (binary responses and continuous response times) ensure robust inference (specifically, identifiability of parameters and models). Moreover, we find a linear relationship between log-transformed response times in the SPIRL task and participants' uncertainty about the outcome. Our analysis illustrates the benefits of Bayesian workflow for a typical use case in TN/CP. We argue that adopting Bayesian workflow for generative modelling helps increase the transparency and robustness of results, which in turn is of fundamental importance for the long-term success of TN/CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":72664,"journal":{"name":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","volume":"9 1","pages":"76-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational (generative) modelling of behaviour has considerable potential for clinical applications. In order to unlock the potential of generative models, reliable statistical inference is crucial. For this, Bayesian workflow has been suggested which, however, has rarely been applied in Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry (TN/CP) so far. Here, we present a worked example of Bayesian workflow in the context of a typical application scenario for TN/CP. This application example uses Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF) models, a family of computational models for hierarchical Bayesian belief updating. When equipped with a suitable response model, HGF models can be fit to behavioural data from cognitive tasks; these data frequently consist of binary responses and are typically univariate. This poses challenges for statistical inference due to the limited information contained in such data. We present a novel set of response models that allow for simultaneous inference from multivariate (here: two) behavioural data types. Using both simulations and empirical data from a speed-incentivised associative reward learning (SPIRL) task, we show that models harnessing information from two different data streams (binary responses and continuous response times) ensure robust inference (specifically, identifiability of parameters and models). Moreover, we find a linear relationship between log-transformed response times in the SPIRL task and participants' uncertainty about the outcome. Our analysis illustrates the benefits of Bayesian workflow for a typical use case in TN/CP. We argue that adopting Bayesian workflow for generative modelling helps increase the transparency and robustness of results, which in turn is of fundamental importance for the long-term success of TN/CP.

计算精神病学中生成建模的贝叶斯工作流。
行为的计算(生成)建模在临床应用中具有相当大的潜力。为了释放生成模型的潜力,可靠的统计推断是至关重要的。为此,贝叶斯工作流已经被提出,然而,迄今为止很少在转化神经建模和计算精神病学(TN/CP)中应用。在这里,我们在TN/CP的典型应用场景中提供了一个贝叶斯工作流的工作示例。本应用示例使用了分层高斯滤波(HGF)模型,这是一组用于分层贝叶斯信念更新的计算模型。当配备合适的反应模型时,HGF模型可以适应认知任务的行为数据;这些数据通常由二元响应组成,通常是单变量的。由于这些数据中包含的信息有限,这对统计推断提出了挑战。我们提出了一套新的反应模型,允许从多变量(这里:两种)行为数据类型中同时推断。利用速度激励联想奖励学习(SPIRL)任务的模拟和经验数据,我们表明利用来自两种不同数据流(二元响应和连续响应时间)的信息的模型确保了鲁棒性推断(特别是参数和模型的可识别性)。此外,我们发现对数变换后的spil任务的响应时间与参与者对结果的不确定性之间存在线性关系。我们的分析说明了贝叶斯工作流对TN/CP中的典型用例的好处。我们认为,采用贝叶斯工作流进行生成建模有助于提高结果的透明度和鲁棒性,这反过来对TN/CP的长期成功至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信