Work Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Among Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study on the Limited Moderating Effect of Podcast Listening.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-30 DOI:10.2196/70640
Lu Li Jung, Yu-Hua Wu
{"title":"Work Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Among Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study on the Limited Moderating Effect of Podcast Listening.","authors":"Lu Li Jung, Yu-Hua Wu","doi":"10.2196/70640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems worldwide, significantly impacting frontline healthcare workers, especially nurses. These professionals have faced considerable psychological stress from caring for COVID-19 patients and the fear of spreading the virus to their families. Studies report that over 132 out of 220 participants (60%) of nurses experience anxiety, depression, and emotional exhaustion, which adversely affects their mental health and the quality of care they provide.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between work-related stress and emotional exhaustion among nurses, and to assess whether listening to podcasts moderates this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between March 1 and March 31, 2023. A total of 271 clinical nurses, aged 20 to 65 years, were recruited for the study. Participants were divided into two groups: the experimental group, consisting of regular podcast listeners (n=173), and the control group, comprising non-listeners (n=98). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local ethics committee (IRB No. YGHIRB20230421B). Validated scales were used to measure work stress, emotional dissonance, and emotional exhaustion. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups in terms of overall work stress (mean difference = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.13, P=.42) or emotional exhaustion (mean difference = 0.07, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.29, P=.53). Emotional dissonance emerged as a significant predictor of emotional exhaustion in both the experimental (β = 0.476, P<.001) and control groups (β = 0.321, P=.010). Nurses reporting higher workloads had significantly higher emotional exhaustion levels (experimental group: β = 0.302, P<.001; control group: β = 0.327, P=.002). Podcast listening demonstrated only a slight, non-significant moderating effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While podcasts alone may not significantly reduce work stress or emotional exhaustion among nurses, indicating a potential, albeit limited, moderating effect of podcasts on emotional well-being. They could serve as a supplementary tool for emotional support. However, broader and more comprehensive interventions are required to address the underlying causes of stress and emotional exhaustion in this population. A more in-depth exploration and recommendations can be made by analyzing the content and patterns of listening. Further research is needed to examine the long-term benefits of integrating podcasts with other digital tools for holistic stress management in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems worldwide, significantly impacting frontline healthcare workers, especially nurses. These professionals have faced considerable psychological stress from caring for COVID-19 patients and the fear of spreading the virus to their families. Studies report that over 132 out of 220 participants (60%) of nurses experience anxiety, depression, and emotional exhaustion, which adversely affects their mental health and the quality of care they provide.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between work-related stress and emotional exhaustion among nurses, and to assess whether listening to podcasts moderates this association.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between March 1 and March 31, 2023. A total of 271 clinical nurses, aged 20 to 65 years, were recruited for the study. Participants were divided into two groups: the experimental group, consisting of regular podcast listeners (n=173), and the control group, comprising non-listeners (n=98). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local ethics committee (IRB No. YGHIRB20230421B). Validated scales were used to measure work stress, emotional dissonance, and emotional exhaustion. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships between variables.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups in terms of overall work stress (mean difference = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.13, P=.42) or emotional exhaustion (mean difference = 0.07, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.29, P=.53). Emotional dissonance emerged as a significant predictor of emotional exhaustion in both the experimental (β = 0.476, P<.001) and control groups (β = 0.321, P=.010). Nurses reporting higher workloads had significantly higher emotional exhaustion levels (experimental group: β = 0.302, P<.001; control group: β = 0.327, P=.002). Podcast listening demonstrated only a slight, non-significant moderating effect.

Conclusions: While podcasts alone may not significantly reduce work stress or emotional exhaustion among nurses, indicating a potential, albeit limited, moderating effect of podcasts on emotional well-being. They could serve as a supplementary tool for emotional support. However, broader and more comprehensive interventions are required to address the underlying causes of stress and emotional exhaustion in this population. A more in-depth exploration and recommendations can be made by analyzing the content and patterns of listening. Further research is needed to examine the long-term benefits of integrating podcasts with other digital tools for holistic stress management in healthcare settings.

Clinicaltrial:

COVID-19大流行期间护士的工作压力和情绪耗竭:播客收听有限调节作用的横断面研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球卫生保健系统带来了前所未有的压力,严重影响了一线卫生保健工作者,特别是护士。由于照顾COVID-19患者以及担心将病毒传播给家人,这些专业人员面临着相当大的心理压力。研究报告称,在220名参与者中,超过132名(60%)的护士经历过焦虑、抑郁和情绪衰竭,这对她们的心理健康和她们提供的护理质量产生了不利影响。目的:本研究旨在探讨护士工作压力与情绪耗竭之间的关系,并评估收听播客是否能调节这种关联。方法:于2023年3月1日至3月31日进行横断面在线调查。研究共招募了271名年龄在20至65岁之间的临床护士。参与者被分为两组:实验组,由经常收听播客的人组成(n=173),对照组,由不收听播客的人组成(n=98)。本研究的伦理批准已获得当地伦理委员会(IRB No. 5)的批准。YGHIRB20230421B)。采用有效量表测量工作压力、情绪失调和情绪耗竭。数据分析包括描述性统计、独立t检验和结构方程模型(SEM)来检验变量之间的关系。结果:实验组与对照组在整体工作压力(平均差异= -0.09,95% CI: -0.31 ~ 0.13, P= 0.42)和情绪耗竭(平均差异= 0.07,95% CI: -0.15 ~ 0.29, P= 0.53)方面无统计学差异。在两项实验中,情绪失调都是情绪耗竭的重要预测因子(β = 0.476, p)。结论:虽然播客本身可能不会显著减少护士的工作压力或情绪耗竭,但表明播客对情绪健康有潜在的调节作用,尽管有限。它们可以作为情感支持的补充工具。然而,需要更广泛和更全面的干预措施来解决这一人群中压力和情绪衰竭的潜在原因。通过分析听力的内容和模式,可以进行更深入的探索和提出建议。需要进一步的研究来检验将播客与其他数字工具集成在医疗保健环境中进行整体压力管理的长期效益。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信