A deep learning algorithm for radiographic measurements of the hip versus human CT measurements: An intermodality agreement study.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601251330554
Christian Greve Jensen, Benjamin Schnack Rasmussen, Søren Overgaard, Claus Varnum, Martin Haagen Haubro, Janni Jensen
{"title":"A deep learning algorithm for radiographic measurements of the hip versus human CT measurements: An intermodality agreement study.","authors":"Christian Greve Jensen, Benjamin Schnack Rasmussen, Søren Overgaard, Claus Varnum, Martin Haagen Haubro, Janni Jensen","doi":"10.1177/20584601251330554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip dysplasia (HD) is a prevalent cause of non-traumatic hip pain, which may result in osteoarthritis. Radiological measurements of HD exhibit variability based on reader and imaging modality, why it is important to know the agreement between different measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate agreement between measurements of lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular inclination angle (AIA) made, respectively, on Computed Tomography (CT) scans by humans and radiographs analyzed by an algorithm. To estimate impact of pelvic rotation on agreement between CT and radiographic measurements.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>CT measurements were retrospectively extracted from 172 radiology reports. Radiographs were analyzed using an algorithm. Bland-Altman analysis assessed agreement between CT and radiographic measurements. Regression analyses estimated impact of pelvic rotation on inter-modality agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean measured bias (95% confidence interval [CI]) between CT and radiographs for LCEA of right/left hip was 5.53° (95% CI: 4.81 to 6.24) and 5.13 (95% CI: 4.43 to 5.83), respectively. Corresponding values for right/left AIA were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.49 to 1.67) and -0.03 (95% CI: -0.60 to 0.05). Pelvic rotation affected right LCEA and AIA measurements, with a change in obturator foramen index of, respectively, 0.35 and 0.6 resulting in approximately 2° change in values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a significant difference in agreement of 5° between CT and radiographs for the LCEA bilaterally. The difference for the AIA was between 0 and 1°, probably of little clinical significance. Pelvic rotation slightly affected bias of the right LCEA, suggesting minimal clinical impact of a slightly rotated pelvis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":"14 4","pages":"20584601251330554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601251330554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hip dysplasia (HD) is a prevalent cause of non-traumatic hip pain, which may result in osteoarthritis. Radiological measurements of HD exhibit variability based on reader and imaging modality, why it is important to know the agreement between different measurement methods.

Purpose: To estimate agreement between measurements of lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular inclination angle (AIA) made, respectively, on Computed Tomography (CT) scans by humans and radiographs analyzed by an algorithm. To estimate impact of pelvic rotation on agreement between CT and radiographic measurements.

Material and methods: CT measurements were retrospectively extracted from 172 radiology reports. Radiographs were analyzed using an algorithm. Bland-Altman analysis assessed agreement between CT and radiographic measurements. Regression analyses estimated impact of pelvic rotation on inter-modality agreement.

Results: Mean measured bias (95% confidence interval [CI]) between CT and radiographs for LCEA of right/left hip was 5.53° (95% CI: 4.81 to 6.24) and 5.13 (95% CI: 4.43 to 5.83), respectively. Corresponding values for right/left AIA were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.49 to 1.67) and -0.03 (95% CI: -0.60 to 0.05). Pelvic rotation affected right LCEA and AIA measurements, with a change in obturator foramen index of, respectively, 0.35 and 0.6 resulting in approximately 2° change in values.

Conclusion: There was a significant difference in agreement of 5° between CT and radiographs for the LCEA bilaterally. The difference for the AIA was between 0 and 1°, probably of little clinical significance. Pelvic rotation slightly affected bias of the right LCEA, suggesting minimal clinical impact of a slightly rotated pelvis.

髋关节放射测量与人体CT测量的深度学习算法:一项多模式协议研究。
背景:髋关节发育不良(HD)是非外伤性髋关节疼痛的常见原因,可能导致骨关节炎。HD的放射测量表现出基于阅读器和成像方式的可变性,为什么了解不同测量方法之间的一致性很重要。目的:评估人工计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的侧中心边缘角(LCEA)和髋臼倾斜角(AIA)与用算法分析的x线片之间的一致性。评估骨盆旋转对CT和x线测量结果一致性的影响。材料和方法:回顾性提取172份影像学报告的CT测量数据。用一种算法分析x光片。Bland-Altman分析评估了CT和x线测量的一致性。回归分析估计骨盆旋转对多模态一致性的影响。结果:CT和x线片对左右髋关节LCEA的平均测量偏差(95%可信区间[CI])分别为5.53°(95% CI: 4.81至6.24)和5.13°(95% CI: 4.43至5.83)。右/左AIA对应值分别为1.08 (95% CI: 0.49 ~ 1.67)和-0.03 (95% CI: -0.60 ~ 0.05)。骨盆旋转影响右侧LCEA和AIA测量,闭孔指数变化分别为0.35和0.6,导致数值变化约2°。结论:双侧LCEA的CT与x线影像吻合度相差5°,差异有统计学意义。AIA的差异在0 ~ 1°之间,可能没有什么临床意义。骨盆旋转轻微影响右侧LCEA偏置,提示骨盆轻微旋转的临床影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信